Literature DB >> 23171572

Wild Boars as Hosts of Human-Pathogenic Anaplasma phagocytophilum Variants.

José de la Fuente, Christian Gortazar.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23171572      PMCID: PMC3557900          DOI: 10.3201/eid1812.120778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Michalik et al. () reported a 12% prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis and tick-borne fever of ruminants, in wild boars in Poland. A. phagocytophilum has been reported with low prevalence among wild boar in the Czech Republic, Slovenia (), and Japan (). In Spain and Mississippi, United States, A. phagocytophilum in wild boars or feral pigs, respectively, has not been reported (,). Furthermore, in Slovenia and Poland, the A. phagocytophilum gene sequences found in samples from wild boars were identical to those found in samples from humans and the tick vector Ixodes ricinus (). These results suggested, as pointed out by Michalik et al. (), that wild boar might play a role in the epizootiology of A. phagocytophilum by serving as a natural reservoir host, at least in some regions. To test this hypothesis, we conducted transcriptomics studies to characterize host response to A. phagocytophilum infection in naturally and experimentally infected boars (,). The results suggested that boars are susceptible to A. phagocytophilum, but are able to control infection, mainly through activation of innate immune responses and cytoskeleton rearrangement to promote phagocytosis and autophagy. Control of A. phagocytophilum infection in boars might result in infection levels below PCR detection or infection clearance, contributing to the low percentage of infection prevalence detected for this species in most regions. The low detection levels suggest that boars have a low or no impact as a reservoir host for A. phagocytophilum. Even if boars remain persistently infected with A. phagocytophilum at low levels by downregulating some adaptive immune genes and delaying the apoptotic death of neutrophils through activation of the Jak-STAT pathway, among other mechanisms (), their role as a source of infection for ticks remains to be demonstrated.
  6 in total

1.  Diversity of groESL sequences of Anaplasma phagocytophilum among dogs in Slovenia.

Authors:  K Strasek Smrdel; N Tozon; D Duh; M Petrovec; T Avsic Zupanc
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Anaplasma spp. in wild mammals and Ixodes ricinus from the north of Spain.

Authors:  Aránzazu Portillo; Laura Pérez-Martínez; Sonia Santibáñez; Paula Santibáñez; Ana M Palomar; José A Oteo
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.133

3.  Tick-borne disease agents in various wildlife from Mississippi.

Authors:  Ashley H Castellaw; Erle F Chenney; Andrea S Varela-Stokes
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.133

4.  Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum from Wild Boars and Deer in Japan.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Masuzawa; Yoshiyuki Uchishima; Takashi Fukui; Yoshihiro Okamoto; Maki Muto; Nobuo Koizumi; Akio Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.362

5.  Gene expression profile suggests that pigs (Sus scrofa) are susceptible to Anaplasma phagocytophilum but control infection.

Authors:  Ruth C Galindo; Nieves Ayllón; Katja Strašek Smrdel; Mariana Boadella; Beatriz Beltrán-Beck; María Mazariegos; Nerea García; José M Pérez de la Lastra; Tatjana Avsic-Zupanc; Katherine M Kocan; Christian Gortazar; José de la Fuente
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Wild boars as hosts of human-pathogenic Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants.

Authors:  Jerzy Michalik; Joanna Stańczak; Stella Cieniuch; Maria Racewicz; Bożena Sikora; Mirosława Dabert
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.883

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Molecular investigation for bacterial and protozoan tick-borne pathogens in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from southern Germany.

Authors:  Cornelia Silaghi; Kurt Pfister; Evelyn Overzier
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.133

2.  Molecular detection of tick-borne bacteria and protozoa in cervids and wild boars from Portugal.

Authors:  André Pereira; Ricardo Parreira; Mónica Nunes; Afonso Casadinho; Maria Luísa Vieira; Lenea Campino; Carla Maia
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in European wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from Transylvania, Romania.

Authors:  T Kiss; D Cadar; F A Krupaci; A D Bordeanu; M Spînu
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 4.  Anaplasma phagocytophilum Manipulates Host Cell Apoptosis by Different Mechanisms to Establish Infection.

Authors:  Pilar Alberdi; Pedro J Espinosa; Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; José de la Fuente
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2016-07-15

5.  Tick- and fly-borne bacteria in ungulates: the prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, haemoplasmas and rickettsiae in water buffalo and deer species in Central Europe, Hungary.

Authors:  Sándor Hornok; László Sugár; Isabel G Fernández de Mera; José de la Fuente; Gábor Horváth; Tibor Kovács; Attila Micsutka; Enikő Gönczi; Barbara Flaisz; Nóra Takács; Róbert Farkas; Marina L Meli; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Molecular Detection of Zoonotic and Non-Zoonotic Pathogens from Wild Boars and Their Ticks in the Corsican Wetlands.

Authors:  Baptiste Defaye; Sara Moutailler; Christian Pietri; Clemence Galon; Sébastien Grech-Angelini; Vanina Pasqualini; Yann Quilichini
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.