| Literature DB >> 31780770 |
Daisuke Koshiyama1, Masaki Fukunaga2, Naohiro Okada1,3, Kentaro Morita1, Kiyotaka Nemoto4, Kaori Usui1, Hidenaga Yamamori5, Yuka Yasuda6,7, Michiko Fujimoto5, Noriko Kudo7, Hirotsugu Azechi8, Yoshiyuki Watanabe9, Naoki Hashimoto10, Hisashi Narita10, Ichiro Kusumi10, Kazutaka Ohi11,12, Takamitsu Shimada11, Yuzuru Kataoka11, Maeri Yamamoto13, Norio Ozaki13, Go Okada14, Yasumasa Okamoto14, Kenichiro Harada15, Koji Matsuo16, Hidenori Yamasue17, Osamu Abe18, Ryuichiro Hashimoto19, Tsutomu Takahashi20, Tomoki Hori21, Masahito Nakataki22, Toshiaki Onitsuka23, Laurena Holleran24, Neda Jahanshad25, Theo G M van Erp26, Jessica Turner27, Gary Donohoe24, Paul M Thompson25, Kiyoto Kasai1,3, Ryota Hashimoto28,29,30.
Abstract
Identifying both the commonalities and differences in brain structures among psychiatric disorders is important for understanding the pathophysiology. Recently, the ENIGMA-Schizophrenia DTI Working Group performed a large-scale meta-analysis and reported widespread white matter microstructural alterations in schizophrenia; however, no similar cross-disorder study has been carried out to date. Here, we conducted mega-analyses comparing white matter microstructural differences between healthy comparison subjects (HCS; N = 1506) and patients with schizophrenia (N = 696), bipolar disorder (N = 211), autism spectrum disorder (N = 126), or major depressive disorder (N = 398; total N = 2937 from 12 sites). In comparison with HCS, we found that schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism spectrum disorder share similar white matter microstructural differences in the body of the corpus callosum; schizophrenia and bipolar disorder featured comparable changes in the limbic system, such as the fornix and cingulum. By comparison, alterations in tracts connecting neocortical areas, such as the uncinate fasciculus, were observed only in schizophrenia. No significant difference was found in major depressive disorder. In a direct comparison between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, there were no significant differences. Significant differences between schizophrenia/bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder were found in the limbic system, which were similar to the differences in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder relative to HCS. While schizophrenia and bipolar disorder may have similar pathological characteristics, the biological characteristics of major depressive disorder may be close to those of HCS. Our findings provide insights into nosology and encourage further investigations of shared and unique pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31780770 PMCID: PMC7156346 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0553-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Psychiatry ISSN: 1359-4184 Impact factor: 15.992
Basic characteristics of the included protocols
| Protocol name | Healthy comparison subjects | Individuals with schizophrenia | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Age | |||||||||
| Male | Female | Mean | s.d. | Male | Female | Mean | s.d. | |||
| 01. Osaka B | 347 | 194 | 153 | 30.6 | 13.2 | 87 | 40 | 47 | 34.0 | 12.9 |
| 02. Osaka A | 238 | 131 | 107 | 31.3 | 13.2 | 69 | 35 | 34 | 34.6 | 12.4 |
| 03. Kanazawa | 113 | 72 | 41 | 33.9 | 9.9 | 111 | 44 | 67 | 39.9 | 12.5 |
| 04. Nagoya | 124 | 77 | 47 | 36.5 | 9.8 | 53 | 29 | 24 | 43.0 | 9.9 |
| 05. Kyoto | 75 | 46 | 29 | 28.6 | 9.4 | 52 | 24 | 28 | 36.4 | 9.0 |
| 06. Tokyo A | 76 | 45 | 31 | 28.2 | 5.5 | 44 | 26 | 18 | 29.7 | 8.4 |
| 07. Toyama A | 48 | 29 | 19 | 25.6 | 3.4 | 61 | 31 | 30 | 28.6 | 8.5 |
| 08. Hokkaido A | 14 | 8 | 6 | 44.4 | 13.4 | 92 | 36 | 56 | 36.0 | 13.6 |
| 09. Hokkaido B | 39 | 22 | 17 | 33.7 | 7.5 | 42 | 14 | 28 | 38.7 | 10.0 |
| 10. Tokyo D | 51 | 17 | 34 | 39.2 | 7.9 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 29.4 | 9.1 |
| 11. Tokyo B | 50 | 30 | 20 | 28.6 | 6.8 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 30.6 | 12.4 |
| 12. Tokushima | 21 | 11 | 10 | 42.7 | 10.8 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 42.7 | 10.3 |
| 13. Tokyo C | 27 | 10 | 17 | 38.0 | 9.5 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 37.9 | 4.2 |
| 14. Toyama B | 11 | 4 | 7 | 26.8 | 3.6 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 28.6 | 9.1 |
| 15. Kyushu | 6 | 4 | 2 | 35.8 | 11.8 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 54.6 | 9.7 |
| Total | 1240 | 700 | 540 | 32.0 | 11.6 | 696 | 330 | 366 | 36.0 | 12.2 |
Brain region specificity of white matter microstructural alterations in psychiatric disorders
| Limbic system–limbic system | Limbic system/spine/brain stem–cortex | Right cortex–left cortex | Cortex–cortex (ipsilateral side) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cingulum (cingulate gyrus; FA, RD) | Anterior corona radiata (FA, MD, RD) | Body of the corpus callosum (FA, MD, RD) | Superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (FA, MD, RD) |
| External capsule (FA, RD) | Anterior limb of the internal capsule (FA, RD) | Corpus callosum (FA, MD, RD) | Superior longitudinal fasciculus (FA, MD, RD) |
| Fornix (column and body of the fornix; FA, MD, AD, RD) | Corona radiata (FA, MD, RD) | Genu of the corpus callosum (FA, MD, RD) | Uncinate fasciculus (MD, AD, RD) |
| Fornix (crus)/Stria terminalis (FA, RD) | Posterior corona radiata (MD, AD, RD) | ||
| Posterior thalamic radiation (FA, RD) | |||
| Superior corona radiata (MD, AD, RD) | |||
| Sagittal stratum (FA, RD) | |||
| Cingulum (cingulate gyrus; FA) | Posterior limb of the internal capsule (AD) | Body of the corpus callosum (MD, RD) | |
| Fornix (column and body of the fornix; MD, AD, RD) | |||
| Body of the corpus callosum (FA) | |||
ROIs, which showed significant differences between patients with psychiatric disorders and healthy comparison subjects after adjusting age, sex, age × sex, age2, and age2 × sex as covariates, were listed. The ROIs were classified according to the brain regions that they connect
FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, AD axial diffusivity, RD radial diffusivity, ROI region of interest
Fig. 1Differences in fractional anisotropy between the patients with schizophrenia (SZ) and healthy comparison subjects (HCS). a Fractional anisotropy (FA) differences between the patients with schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects (HCS) for 25 white matter regions representing major fasciculi. The gradient bar indicates Cohen’s d effect sizes after mega-analysis. b The figure on the right, representing our results from COCORO, shows Cohen’s d effect sizes after mega-analysis across 15 cohorts for FA differences in the patients with schizophrenia (N = 696) versus HCS (N = 1240), after including age, sex, age × sex, age2, and age2 × sex as covariates. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Regions with significant differences after adjusting for multiple regions tested [p < 0.002 (0.05/25)] are highlighted in orange. The figure on the left represents the results from the ENIGMA-Schizophrenia DTI consortium [29 cohorts for FA differences in patients with schizophrenia (N = 1963) versus HCS (N = 2359)]. The average FA represents the average FA of the full skeleton. We generally replicated the results of ENIGMA-Schizophrenia DTI. c Forest plot of effect sizes for 15 cohorts for average FA differences in the patients with schizophrenia versus HCS. COCORO Cognitive Genetics Collaborative Research Organization, ENIGMA-SZ-DTI Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis consortium-Schizophrenia diffusion tensor imaging, CC corpus callosum, GCC genu of the corpus callosum, BCC body of the corpus callosum, SCC splenium of the corpus callosum, CGC cingulum (cingulate gyrus), CGH cingulum (hippocampus), CR corona radiata, ACR anterior corona radiata, PCR posterior corona radiata, SCR superior corona radiata, CST corticospinal tract, EC external capsule, FX fornix, FX/ST fornix (crus)/stria terminalis, IC internal capsule, ALIC anterior limb of the internal capsule, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, IFO inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, RLIC retrolenticular part of the internal capsule, PTR posterior thalamic radiation, SFO superior fronto-occipital fasciculus, SLF superior longitudinal fasciculus, SS sagittal stratum, UNC uncinate fasciculus
Fig. 2Effect sizes of the differences in DTI indices between patients with psychiatric disorders and healthy comparison subjects in each white matter region for the main findings. Significant differences in regions after adjusting for multiple regions tested [p < 0.002 (0.05/25)] are highlighted in orange. DTI diffusion tensor imaging, HCS healthy comparison subjects, SZ schizophrenia, BPD bipolar disorder, ASD autism spectrum disorder, MDD major depressive disorder, FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, AD axial diffusivity, RD radial diffusivity
Fig. 3White matter microstructural alterations across psychiatric disorders. Color scales indicate the absolute value of Cohen’s d effect size of the DTI indices (FA, MD, AD, and RD) between each patient population (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and major depressive disorder) and healthy comparison subjects in each region of interest (UNC, BCC, CGC, and FX). Gray dots indicate statistical significance. The patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism spectrum disorder have common white matter alterations in the body of the corpus callosum; the patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have common white matter alterations in the limbic system, such as the fornix and the cingulum; microstructural alterations in white matter regions that connect neocortical areas, such as uncinate fasciculus, were specific to patients with schizophrenia. DTI diffusion tensor imaging, SZ schizophrenia, BPD bipolar disorder, MDD major depressive disorder, ASD autism spectrum disorder, FA fractional anisotropy, MD mean diffusivity, AD axial diffusivity, RD radial diffusivity, UNC uncinate fasciculus, BCC body of the corpus callosum, CGC cingulum (cingulate gyrus), FX fornix