Literature DB >> 33680330

Indications of the extraction of symptomatic impacted third molars. A systematic review.

María Peñarrocha-Diago1, Octavi Camps-Font2, Alba Sánchez-Torres2, Rui Figueiredo3, María-Angeles Sánchez-Garcés4, Cosme Gay-Escoda5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A literature review was made to determine when third molar (3M) extraction is recommended in symptomatic patients and when it is not recommended.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Medline (PubMed) and EMBASE search was made for articles related to indications for the extraction of 3Ms, published in the last 10 years and up until September 2018.
RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 175 articles. After eliminating duplicates, a total of 173 articles were subjected to review of the title and abstract. Only 19 studies were finally included in the systematic review. There was a well documented increase in morbidity associated to impacted 3Ms (non-restorable caries, fracture, infection, periodontal disease, repeated pericoronitis, cysts and tumors), and in the presence of disease, extraction was considered to be indicated. The extraction of 3Ms with signs and/or symptoms of periodontal disease improved periodontal health at the distal surface of the second molar. Postoperative quality of life of patients with symptomatic 3Ms and with disease improved after surgical extraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Extraction is indicated in the presence of disease associated to an impacted 3M, whether symptomatic or not. In contrast, extraction is not indicated in the absence of infection or other associated disease conditions. Key words:Third molar, periodontal disease, periodontitis, pericoronitis, dental caries, occlusal caries, mandibular cysts, osteomyelitis, odontogenic tumor. Copyright:
© 2021 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680330      PMCID: PMC7920557          DOI: 10.4317/jced.56887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  30 in total

1.  Third molar infections.

Authors:  José Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Third molar removal: an overview of indications, imaging, evaluation, and assessment of risk.

Authors:  Robert D Marciani
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Quality of life following lower third molar removal.

Authors:  M Colorado-Bonnin; E Valmaseda-Castellón; L Berini-Aytés; C Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 5.  Interventions for treating asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  T G Mettes; M E L Nienhuijs; W J M van der Sanden; E H Verdonschot; A J M Plasschaert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

Review 6.  Is there pathology associated with asymptomatic third molars?

Authors:  Robert D Marciani
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Prevalence of Distal Caries in Mandibular Second Molar Due to Impacted Third Molar.

Authors:  Kamran Bokhari Syed; Fatima Saeed Alshahrani; Wejdan Saad Alabsi; Zainab Ali Alqahtani; Mohammad Shahul Hameed; Abdel Bagi Mustafa; Tanveer Alam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Removal of symptomatic third molars may improve periodontal status of remaining dentition.

Authors:  Carolyn Dicus-Brookes; Maura Partrick; George H Blakey; Jan Faulk-Eggleston; Steven Offenbacher; Ceib Phillips; Raymond P White
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Effect of quality of life measures on the decision to remove third molars in subjects with mild pericoronitis symptoms.

Authors:  Dana T Tang; Ceib Phillips; William R Proffit; Lorne D Koroluk; Raymond P White
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Indications for removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a single institutional experience in Libya.

Authors:  B Krishnan; Mohammad Hossni El Sheikh; El-Gehani Rafa; H Orafi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-11-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® silk sutures for mucosal closure following surgical removal of mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar.

Authors:  Ramdas Balakrishna; Dharnappa Poojary; Arvind R; Shrikanth Sali; Ashok Kumar Moharana; Deepak Ts
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2022-06-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.