| Literature DB >> 31775187 |
Piotr Wilkołek1, Marcin Szczepanik2, Wiesław Sitkowski2, Beata Rodzik3, Michał Pluta4, Iwona Taszkun2, Marcin Gołyński5.
Abstract
Although intradermal testing (IDT) is commonly used in the etiological diagnosis of allergies, in vitro testing for specific IgE (sIgE) is an attractive alternative. Currently, new laboratory techniques in veterinary allergological practice, including multiple allergen simultaneous tests (MASTs), gradually supersede in vivo tests. Both, serological (sIgE) and IDTs in fourteen atopic Malopolski horses were performed. Correlation and agreement between test results were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that sIgE to Acarus siro had the best diagnostic performance (Area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.969), followed by Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (AUC = 0.844), Dermatophagoides farinae (AUC = 0.813) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae (AUC = 0.803). A significant positive correlation between IDT and MAST was found for A. siro (rS = 0.870; p = 0.00005), and D. farinae (rS = 0.657; p = 0.011). There was significant moderate agreement for 2 of 5 allergens, A. siro (κ = 0.569) and D. farinae (κ = 0.485) in semiquantitative assessment and significant fair to substantial agreement for 3 of 5 allergens, D. pteronyssinus (κ = 0.689), A. siro (κ = 0.569), D. farinae (κ = 0.432) in dichotomic assessment. Sensitivity ranged from 44% to 89%, depending on the allergen, while specificity was significantly higher for all allergens in MAST (60%-100%); the mean accuracy was 73% (manufacturer cut-off) and 77.4% (optimal cut-off) based on the Youden index. Compared with IDT, serological MAST showed good detection performance for 60% allergen sIgE in dichotomic assessment with substantial diagnostic capability, but careful clinical interpretation is needed for some allergens.Entities:
Keywords: Atopy; ROC curve; horses; intradermal testing; sIgE
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31775187 PMCID: PMC6883192 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Sci ISSN: 1229-845X Impact factor: 1.672
Analysis of IDT results (+, ++, and +++) and IgE concentrations in sera (kU/L) showing the number, percentage of positive reactions, mean values and ranges on the MAST in horses with AD
| Allergen | IDT (n = 14): No. (%) PR | MAST IgE: No. (%) PR, MV (R) (kU/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early (0.5 h) | Late (4 h) | ||
| 11 (79) | 8 (57) | 11 (79), 5.38 (0.2–15.9) | |
| 9 (64) | 6 (63) | 7 (50), 1.36 (0.2–4.8) | |
| 6 (43) | 5 (36) | 10 (71), 2.1 (0.2–6.8) | |
| 9 (64) | 7 (50) | 9 (64), 2.7 (0.2–16) | |
| 10 (71) | 9 (64) | 11 (79), 2.44 (0.3–7.4) | |
IDT, intradermal test; MAST, multiple allergen simultaneous test; N, number; PRs, positive reactions; MV, mean values; R, ranges; AD, atopic dermatitis.
Fig. 1ROC curves for intradermal test and allergen-specific IgE to mites based on multiple allergen simultaneous test analysis of sera in horses with atopic dermatitis.
ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Diagnostic performance of specific IgE measurement in response to mite allergens calculated from MAST compared to IDT data
| Allergen | Cut-off value (kU/L) | Se (%) | Sp (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Acc (%) | Youden index | AUC (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Man ≥ 1, 1.4 | 82 | 33 | 82 | 33 | 71 | 0.152 | 0.803* (0.572–1.0) | |
| Opt, 1.7 | 73 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 79 | 0.727 | ||
| Man ≥ 1, 1.3 | 44 | 60 | 67 | 38 | 50 | −0.156 | 0.467 (0.122–0.811) | |
| Opt, 1.3 | 44 | 60 | 67 | 38 | 50 | 0.200 | ||
| Man ≥ 1, 1.0 | 100 | 57 | 70 | 100 | 79 | 0.571 | 0.969*** (0.889–1.0) | |
| Opt, 2.4 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 93 | 0.857 | ||
| Man ≥ 1, 1.2 | 89 | 80 | 89 | 80 | 86 | 0.689 | 0.844** (0.622–1.0) | |
| Opt, 1.2 | 89 | 80 | 89 | 80 | 86 | 0.689 | ||
| Man ≥ 1, 1.0 | 90 | 50 | 82 | 67 | 79 | 0.400 | 0.813* (0.565–1.0) | |
| Opt, 1.1 | 80 | 75 | 89 | 60 | 79 | 0.550 |
Manufacturer and optimal cut-off points were determined using the Youden index.
Man, manufacturer; Opt, optimal; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; Acc, accuracy; AUC, area under the curve.
Significant values are indicated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Correlation and agreement analysis between sIgE concentrations (kU/L) and IDT results
| Allergen | Spearman's rank correlation | Cohen's kappa coefficient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rS | κ | |||||
| GIR | DP | GIR | DP | |||
| 0.152 | 0.11 | 0.059 | 0.152 | 0.379 | 0.285 | |
| 0.185 | 0.527 | 0.089 | −0.043 | 0.318 | 0.564 | |
| 0.870*** | 0.00005 | 0.569*** | 0.571** | 0.0008 | 0.009 | |
| 0.529 | 0.052 | 0.125 | 0.689** | 0.119 | 0.005 | |
| 0.657* | 0.011 | 0.485** | 0.432* | 0.002 | 0.0497 | |
sIgE, specific IgE; IDT, intradermal testing; GIR, grade of the intensity of the reaction; DP, dichotomic parameter.
Significant values are indicated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.