Literature DB >> 31773010

An Anthropomorphic Head and Neck Quality Assurance Phantom for Credentialing of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy.

Daniela Branco1, Paige Taylor1, Xiaodong Zhang1, Heng Li1, Michele Guindani2, David Followill1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To design and commission a head and neck (H&N) anthropomorphic phantom that the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC-H) can use to verify the quality of intensity-modulated proton therapy H&N treatments for institutions participating in National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The phantom design was based on a generalized oropharyngeal tumor, including critical H&N structures (parotid glands and spinal cord). Radiochromic film and thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD)-100 capsules were embedded in the phantom and used to evaluate dose delivery. A spot-scanning treatment plan with typical clinical constraints for H&N cancer was created by using the Eclipse analytic algorithm. The treatment plan was approved by a radiation oncologist and the phantom was irradiated 4 times. The measured dose distribution using a ±7%/4 mm gamma analysis (85% of pixels passing) and point doses were compared with the treatment planning system calculations. The prescribed target dose was 6 Gy (RBE) with 646.2 cGy (RBE) and 648.6 cGy (RBE) planned to the superior and inferior TLD, respectively.
RESULTS: For point dosimetry, the average measured-to-calculated dose ratios were 0.984 and 0.986 for the superior and inferior target TLD, respectively. Dose values for the superior and inferior target TLDs were 636.1 cGy and 639.6 cGy, respectively. For the relative dose comparison, the pixel passing rates for the axial and sagittal films, respectively, were 95.5% and 94.2% for trial 1, 97.3% and 93.2% for trial 2, 93.4% and 90.0% for trial 3, and 96.2% and 92.7% for trial 4.
CONCLUSION: The anthropomorphic H&N phantom was successfully designed so that TLD measured-to-calculated ratios were within IROC-H's 7% acceptance criteria, 1.6% and 1.4% lower than expected for the superior and inferior target TLDs, respectively. All trials passed the 85% pixel passing criteria established at IROC-H for the relative dose comparison performed when using a gamma index of ±7%/4 mm. © Copyright 2017 International Journal of Particle Therapy 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core; National Cancer Institute; anthropomorphic head & neck phantom; proton therapy; quality assurance

Year:  2018        PMID: 31773010      PMCID: PMC6871565          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-17-00005.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  8 in total

1.  Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies.

Authors:  Bijan Arjomandy; Ramesh Tailor; Aman Anand; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Karl Prado; Milos Vicic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Authors:  Andrea Molineu; David S Followill; Peter A Balter; William F Hanson; Michael T Gillin; M Saiful Huq; Avraham Eisbruch; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  9 quality assurance.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2007-12

4.  Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Tyler Keith; Carrie Lujano; Nadia Hernandez; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparison of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films for clinical photon and proton beams.

Authors:  S Reinhardt; M Hillbrand; J J Wilkens; W Assmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Jan Schuemann; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; Maryam Moteabbed; Chul Hee Min; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Relative stopping power measurements to aid in the design of anthropomorphic phantoms for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ryan L Grant; Paige A Summers; James L Neihart; Anthony P Blatnica; Narayan Sahoo; Michael T Gillin; David S Followill; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Under-response correction for EBT3 films in the presence of proton spread out Bragg peaks.

Authors:  F Fiorini; D Kirby; J Thompson; S Green; D J Parker; B Jones; M A Hill
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.685

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Value of On-Site Proton Audits.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Jessica Lowenstein; David Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evaluation of image quality of a novel computed tomography metal artifact management technique on an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Daniela Branco; Stephen Kry; Paige Taylor; John Rong; Xiaodong Zhang; Steven Frank; David Followill
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-21

3.  How can we consider variable RBE and LETd prediction during clinical practice? A pediatric case report at the Normandy Proton Therapy Centre using an independent dose engine.

Authors:  Stewart Mein; Benedikt Kopp; Anthony Vela; Pauline Dutheil; Paul Lesueur; Dinu Stefan; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Haberer; Amir Abdollahi; Andrea Mairani; Thomas Tessonnier
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.