Literature DB >> 26547281

Landscape genetics in a changing world: disentangling historical and contemporary influences and inferring change.

Clinton W Epps1, Nusha Keyghobadi2.   

Abstract

Landscape genetics seeks to determine the effect of landscape features on gene flow and genetic structure. Often, such analyses are intended to inform conservation and management. However, depending on the many factors that influence the time to reach equilibrium, genetic structure may more strongly represent past rather than contemporary landscapes. This well-known lag between current demographic processes and population genetic structure often makes it challenging to interpret how contemporary landscapes and anthropogenic activity shape gene flow. Here, we review the theoretical framework for factors that influence time lags, summarize approaches to address this temporal disconnect in landscape genetic studies, and evaluate ways to make inferences about landscape change and its effects on species using genetic data alone or in combination with other data. Those approaches include comparing correlation of genetic structure with historical versus contemporary landscapes, using molecular markers with different rates of evolution, contrasting metrics of genetic structure and gene flow that reflect population genetic processes operating at different temporal scales, comparing historical and contemporary samples, combining genetic data with contemporary estimates of species distribution or movement, and controlling for phylogeographic history. We recommend using simulated data sets to explore time lags in genetic structure, and argue that time lags should be explicitly considered both when designing and interpreting landscape genetic studies. We conclude that the time lag problem can be exploited to strengthen inferences about recent landscape changes and to establish conservation baselines, particularly when genetic data are combined with other data.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  SNP; equilibrium; microsatellite; mitochondrial DNA; phylogeography; scale; temporal; time lag

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547281     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  41 in total

1.  Union of phylogeography and landscape genetics.

Authors:  Leslie J Rissler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Strong fluctuations in aboveground population size do not limit genetic diversity in populations of an endangered biennial species.

Authors:  Zuzana Münzbergová; Maria Šurinová; Iveta Husáková; Jiří Brabec
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Expansion history and environmental suitability shape effective population size in a plant invasion.

Authors:  Joseph Braasch; Brittany S Barker; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Nucleotide Evolution, Domestication Selection, and Genetic Relationships of Chloroplast Genomes in the Economically Important Crop Genus Gossypium.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Ning Wang; Yuan Wang; Xian-Liang Zhang; Bao-Guo Li; Wei Li; Jun-Ji Su; Cai-Xiang Wang; Ai Zhang; Xiong-Feng Ma; Zhong-Hu Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Morphotype divergence and genetic diversity of Hedeoma piperita Benth. in western Mexico.

Authors:  María Luisa Herrera-Arroyo; Yessica Rico; Brenda Y Bedolla-García
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Genetic homogeneity in the face of morphological heterogeneity in the harbor porpoise from the Black Sea and adjacent waters (Phocoena phocoena relicta).

Authors:  Yacine Ben Chehida; Julie Thumloup; Karina Vishnyakova; Pavel Gol'din; Michael C Fontaine
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Physical and ecological isolation contribute to maintain genetic differentiation between fire salamander subspecies.

Authors:  B Antunes; G Velo-Antón; D Buckley; R J Pereira; I Martínez-Solano
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Defaunation leads to microevolutionary changes in a tropical palm.

Authors:  Carolina S Carvalho; Mauro Galetti; Rosane G Colevatti; Pedro Jordano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Spatial population genetics in heavily managed species: Separating patterns of historical translocation from contemporary gene flow in white-tailed deer.

Authors:  Tyler K Chafin; Zachery D Zbinden; Marlis R Douglas; Bradley T Martin; Christopher R Middaugh; M Cory Gray; Jennifer R Ballard; Michael E Douglas
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 10.  Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation.

Authors:  Evan P Kelemen; Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.