PURPOSE: To simulate 24-2 visual field (VF) using optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) for glaucoma evaluation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: One eye each of 39 glaucoma and 31 age-matched normal participants was scanned using 4.5-mm OCTA scans centered on the disc. The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP-CD, %area) was measured. The NFLP-CD and 24-2 VF maps were divided into 8 corresponding sectors using an extension of Garway-Heath scheme. RESULTS: Sector NFLP-CD was transformed to a logarithmic dB scale and converted to sector simulated VF deviation maps. Comparing simulated and actual 24-2 VF maps, the worst sector was in the same or adjacent location in the same hemisphere 97% of the time. VF mean deviation (VF-MD) was simulated by NFLP mean deviation (NFLP-MD). The differences between NFLP-MD and VF-MD in early, moderate, and severe glaucoma stages were -0.9 ± 2.0, 0.9 ± 2.9, and 5.8 ± 3.2 dB. NFLP-MD had better (P = .015) between-visit reproducibility (0.63 dB pooled standard deviation) than VF-MD (1.03 dB). NFLP-MD had a significantly higher sensitivity than VF-MD (P < .001) and overall NFL thickness (P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: OCTA-based simulated VF agreed well with actual 24-2 VF in terms of both the location and severity of glaucoma damage, with the exception of severe glaucoma in which the simulation tended to underestimate severity. The NFLP-MD had better reproducibility than actual VF-MD and holds promise for improving glaucoma monitoring. The NFLP-MD had better diagnostic accuracy than both VF-MD and overall NFL thickness and may be useful for early glaucoma diagnosis.
PURPOSE: To simulate 24-2 visual field (VF) using optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) for glaucoma evaluation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: One eye each of 39 glaucoma and 31 age-matched normal participants was scanned using 4.5-mm OCTA scans centered on the disc. The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP-CD, %area) was measured. The NFLP-CD and 24-2 VF maps were divided into 8 corresponding sectors using an extension of Garway-Heath scheme. RESULTS:Sector NFLP-CD was transformed to a logarithmic dB scale and converted to sector simulated VF deviation maps. Comparing simulated and actual 24-2 VF maps, the worst sector was in the same or adjacent location in the same hemisphere 97% of the time. VF mean deviation (VF-MD) was simulated by NFLP mean deviation (NFLP-MD). The differences between NFLP-MD and VF-MD in early, moderate, and severe glaucoma stages were -0.9 ± 2.0, 0.9 ± 2.9, and 5.8 ± 3.2 dB. NFLP-MD had better (P = .015) between-visit reproducibility (0.63 dB pooled standard deviation) than VF-MD (1.03 dB). NFLP-MD had a significantly higher sensitivity than VF-MD (P < .001) and overall NFL thickness (P = .031). CONCLUSIONS:OCTA-based simulated VF agreed well with actual 24-2 VF in terms of both the location and severity of glaucoma damage, with the exception of severe glaucoma in which the simulation tended to underestimate severity. The NFLP-MD had better reproducibility than actual VF-MD and holds promise for improving glaucoma monitoring. The NFLP-MD had better diagnostic accuracy than both VF-MD and overall NFL thickness and may be useful for early glaucoma diagnosis.
Authors: Miao Zhang; Jie Wang; Alex D Pechauer; Thomas S Hwang; Simon S Gao; Liang Liu; Li Liu; Steven T Bailey; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Phuc V Le; Ou Tan; Vikas Chopra; Brian A Francis; Omar Ragab; Rohit Varma; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Liang Liu; Beth Edmunds; Hana L Takusagawa; Shandiz Tehrani; Lorinna H Lombardi; John C Morrison; Yali Jia; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Gadi Wollstein; Larry Kagemann; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Lindsey S Folio; Michelle L Gabriele; Allison K Ungar; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Tarek A El Beltagi; Christopher Bowd; Catherine Boden; Payam Amini; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yih-Chung Tham; Xiang Li; Tien Y Wong; Harry A Quigley; Tin Aung; Ching-Yu Cheng Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yali Jia; Ou Tan; Jason Tokayer; Benjamin Potsaid; Yimin Wang; Jonathan J Liu; Martin F Kraus; Hrebesh Subhash; James G Fujimoto; Joachim Hornegger; David Huang Journal: Opt Express Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Simon S Gao; Yali Jia; Liang Liu; Miao Zhang; Hana L Takusagawa; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799