PURPOSE: To detect plexus-specific peripapillary retinal perfusion defects in glaucoma, using projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography (PR-OCTA). DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: One eye each of 45 perimetric glaucoma participants and 37 age-matched normal participants were scanned using 4.5-mm OCTA scans centered on the disc. The PR-OCTA algorithm removed flow projection artifacts in OCT angiograms. Five en face OCTA slabs were analyzed: nerve fiber layer plexus (NFLP), ganglion cell layer plexus (GCLP), superficial vascular complex (SVC [NFLP + GCLP]), deep vascular complex (DVC), and all plexi combined. Peripapillary retinal capillary density (CD) and vessel density (VD) were calculated using a reflectance-compensated algorithm. RESULTS: Focal capillary dropout could be visualized more clearly in the NFLP than in the other slabs. The NFLP, SVC, and all-plexus CD in the glaucoma group were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than in the normal group, but no significant differences in GCLP-CD and DVC-CD appeared between the 2 groups. Both NFLP-CD and SVC-CD had excellent diagnostic accuracy, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC = 0.981 and 0.976), correlation with visual field mean deviation (Pearson r = 0.819 and 0.831), and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.947 and 0.942). Performances of NFLP-VD and SVC-VD were similar to the corresponding CD parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In this glaucoma group, reduction in perfusion was more pronounced in superficial layers of the peripapillary retina (NFLP and SVC) than in the deeper layers. Reflectance-compensated CD and VD parameters for both NFLP and SVC could be useful in the clinical management of glaucoma.
PURPOSE: To detect plexus-specific peripapillary retinal perfusion defects in glaucoma, using projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography (PR-OCTA). DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: One eye each of 45 perimetric glaucomaparticipants and 37 age-matched normal participants were scanned using 4.5-mm OCTA scans centered on the disc. The PR-OCTA algorithm removed flow projection artifacts in OCT angiograms. Five en face OCTA slabs were analyzed: nerve fiber layer plexus (NFLP), ganglion cell layer plexus (GCLP), superficial vascular complex (SVC [NFLP + GCLP]), deep vascular complex (DVC), and all plexi combined. Peripapillary retinal capillary density (CD) and vessel density (VD) were calculated using a reflectance-compensated algorithm. RESULTS: Focal capillary dropout could be visualized more clearly in the NFLP than in the other slabs. The NFLP, SVC, and all-plexus CD in the glaucoma group were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than in the normal group, but no significant differences in GCLP-CD and DVC-CD appeared between the 2 groups. Both NFLP-CD and SVC-CD had excellent diagnostic accuracy, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC = 0.981 and 0.976), correlation with visual field mean deviation (Pearson r = 0.819 and 0.831), and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.947 and 0.942). Performances of NFLP-VD and SVC-VD were similar to the corresponding CD parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In this glaucoma group, reduction in perfusion was more pronounced in superficial layers of the peripapillary retina (NFLP and SVC) than in the deeper layers. Reflectance-compensated CD and VD parameters for both NFLP and SVC could be useful in the clinical management of glaucoma.
Authors: Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Linda M Zangwill; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Nathanael J Fuller; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Luke J Saunders; Min Hee Suh; Kyle Hasenstab; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: J S Schuman; M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; T Pedut-Kloizman; C P Lin; E Hertzmark; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1995-05
Authors: Liang Liu; Yali Jia; Hana L Takusagawa; Alex D Pechauer; Beth Edmunds; Lorinna Lombardi; Ellen Davis; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros; Akram Belghith Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Hana L Takusagawa; Liang Liu; Kelly N Ma; Yali Jia; Simon S Gao; Miao Zhang; Beth Edmunds; Mansi Parikh; Shandiz Tehrani; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yali Jia; Ou Tan; Jason Tokayer; Benjamin Potsaid; Yimin Wang; Jonathan J Liu; Martin F Kraus; Hrebesh Subhash; James G Fujimoto; Joachim Hornegger; David Huang Journal: Opt Express Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Yali Jia; John C Morrison; Jason Tokayer; Ou Tan; Lorinna Lombardi; Bernhard Baumann; Chen D Lu; Woojhon Choi; James G Fujimoto; David Huang Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Simon S Gao; Yali Jia; Liang Liu; Miao Zhang; Hana L Takusagawa; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rachel Patel; Jie Wang; J Peter Campbell; Lee Kiang; Andreas Lauer; Christina Flaxel; Thomas Hwang; Brandon Lujan; David Huang; Steven T Bailey; Yali Jia Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Liang Liu; Ou Tan; Eliesa Ing; John C Morrison; Beth Edmunds; Ellen Davis; Seema Gupta; Lorinna H Lombardi; Yali Jia; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-11-23 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Weiye Song; Sipei Fu; Shangshang Song; Sui Zhang; Lei Zhang; Steven Ness; Manishi Desai; Ji Yi Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.593
Authors: Ou Tan; Liang Liu; Qisheng You; Jie Wang; Aiyin Chen; Eliesa Ing; John C Morrison; Yali Jia; David Huang Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Tristan T Hormel; Yali Jia; Yifan Jian; Thomas S Hwang; Steven T Bailey; Mark E Pennesi; David J Wilson; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 21.198