AIMS: To determine the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness at which visual field (VF) damage becomes detectable and associated with structural loss. METHODS: In a prospective cross-sectional study, 72 healthy and 40 glaucoma subjects (one eye per subject) recruited from an academic institution had VF examinations and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) optic disc cube scans (Humphrey field analyser and Cirrus HD-OCT, respectively). Comparison of global mean and sectoral RNFL thicknesses with VF threshold values showed a plateau of threshold values at high RNFL thicknesses and a sharp decrease at lower RNFL thicknesses. A 'broken stick' statistical model was fitted to global and sectoral data to estimate the RNFL thickness 'tipping point' where the VF threshold values become associated with the structural measurements. The slope for the association between structure and function was computed for data above and below the tipping point. RESULTS: The mean RNFL thickness threshold for VF loss was 75.3 μm (95% CI: 68.9 to 81.8), reflecting a 17.3% RNFL thickness loss from age-matched normative value. Above the tipping point, the slope for RNFL thickness and threshold value was 0.03 dB/μm (CI: -0.02 to 0.08) and below the tipping point, it was 0.28 dB/μm (CI: 0.18 to 0.38); the difference between the slopes was statistically significant (p<0.001). A similar pattern was observed for quadrant and clock-hour analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial structural loss (∼17%) appears to be necessary for functional loss to be detectable using the current testing methods.
AIMS: To determine the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness at which visual field (VF) damage becomes detectable and associated with structural loss. METHODS: In a prospective cross-sectional study, 72 healthy and 40 glaucoma subjects (one eye per subject) recruited from an academic institution had VF examinations and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) optic disc cube scans (Humphrey field analyser and Cirrus HD-OCT, respectively). Comparison of global mean and sectoral RNFL thicknesses with VF threshold values showed a plateau of threshold values at high RNFL thicknesses and a sharp decrease at lower RNFL thicknesses. A 'broken stick' statistical model was fitted to global and sectoral data to estimate the RNFL thickness 'tipping point' where the VF threshold values become associated with the structural measurements. The slope for the association between structure and function was computed for data above and below the tipping point. RESULTS: The mean RNFL thickness threshold for VF loss was 75.3 μm (95% CI: 68.9 to 81.8), reflecting a 17.3% RNFL thickness loss from age-matched normative value. Above the tipping point, the slope for RNFL thickness and threshold value was 0.03 dB/μm (CI: -0.02 to 0.08) and below the tipping point, it was 0.28 dB/μm (CI: 0.18 to 0.38); the difference between the slopes was statistically significant (p<0.001). A similar pattern was observed for quadrant and clock-hour analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial structural loss (∼17%) appears to be necessary for functional loss to be detectable using the current testing methods.
Authors: J S Schuman; M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; T Pedut-Kloizman; C P Lin; E Hertzmark; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1995-05
Authors: Patricio G Schlottmann; Stefano De Cilla; David S Greenfield; Joseph Caprioli; David F Garway-Heath Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Andrew J Feola; Jieming Fu; Rachael Allen; Victoria Yang; Ian C Campbell; Amy Ottensmeyer; C Ross Ethier; Machelle Pardue Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Robert A Avery; Avital Cnaan; Joel S Schuman; Chieh-Li Chen; Natalie C Glaug; Roger J Packer; Graham E Quinn; Hiroshi Ishikawa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Liang Liu; Beth Edmunds; Hana L Takusagawa; Shandiz Tehrani; Lorinna H Lombardi; John C Morrison; Yali Jia; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Robert A Avery; Avital Cnaan; Joel S Schuman; Chieh-Li Chen; Natalie C Glaug; Roger J Packer; Graham E Quinn; Hiroshi Ishikawa Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Scott D Walter; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Kristin M Galetta; Reiko E Sakai; Daniel J Feller; Sam B Henderson; James A Wilson; Maureen G Maguire; Steven L Galetta; Elliot Frohman; Peter A Calabresi; Joel S Schuman; Laura J Balcer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mitra Sehi; Iman Goharian; Ranjith Konduru; Ou Tan; Sowmya Srinivas; Srinivas R Sadda; Brian A Francis; David Huang; David S Greenfield Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 12.079