| Literature DB >> 31768889 |
Wojciech Michalski1, Grazyna Poniatowska1, Joanna Jonska-Gmyrek1, Jakub Kucharz2, Pawel Stelmasiak1, Karol Nietupski1, Katarzyna Ossolinska-Skurczynska1, Michal Sobieszczuk1, Tomasz Demkow1, Pawel Wiechno1.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major complication of cancer and its treatment, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. The appropriate choice of thromboprophylaxis method and duration is, therefore, of utmost importance. We conducted an extensive review of the literature concerning VTE in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancers. Special attention was paid to risk factors, different types of surgery (transurethral, pelvic, abdominal-open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted) and different medications used (heparins, vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants). Original papers, reviews and guidelines were identified in Medline database. The available data were then summarised for the purpose of this article. Venous thromboprophylaxis is obligatory in urological cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Unless individual contraindications are recognised, the available guidelines should be followed. The variety of clinical scenarios and patients' comorbidities necessitate cooperation with other specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, etc.) in choosing the optimal management. Thrombosis risk must be carefully weighed against bleeding risk.Entities:
Keywords: Deep venous thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; Thromboprophylaxis; Urological surgery; Venous thromboembolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31768889 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1331-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Oncol ISSN: 1357-0560 Impact factor: 3.064