OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of post-discharge venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in UK pelvic cancer centres consistent with national guidelines. METHODS: Data was collected from healthcare professionals from 64 UK pelvic cancer centres. RESULTS: After radical cystectomy (RC), all cancer centres routinely use low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the perioperative period. After RC 67% of cancer centres use post-discharge LMWH routinely. After radical prostatectomy (RP), 98% of units use perioperative LMWH VTE prophylaxis routinely. After RP, 61% of hospitals always use post-discharge LMWH. In all, 27% of all UK cancer centres reported deaths or serious VTE complications from urological pelvic cancer surgery in the last 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued explicit guidance of VTE prophylaxis after pelvic and abdominal cancer surgery. Conversion of national guidance into local policy is ≈60% for UK pelvic cancer centres. A lack of good quality evidence is cited as a reason for not adhering to NICE guidance.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of post-discharge venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in UK pelvic cancer centres consistent with national guidelines. METHODS: Data was collected from healthcare professionals from 64 UK pelvic cancer centres. RESULTS: After radical cystectomy (RC), all cancer centres routinely use low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the perioperative period. After RC 67% of cancer centres use post-discharge LMWH routinely. After radical prostatectomy (RP), 98% of units use perioperative LMWHVTE prophylaxis routinely. After RP, 61% of hospitals always use post-discharge LMWH. In all, 27% of all UK cancer centres reported deaths or serious VTE complications from urological pelvic cancer surgery in the last 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued explicit guidance of VTE prophylaxis after pelvic and abdominal cancer surgery. Conversion of national guidance into local policy is ≈60% for UK pelvic cancer centres. A lack of good quality evidence is cited as a reason for not adhering to NICE guidance.
Authors: Wojciech Michalski; Grazyna Poniatowska; Joanna Jonska-Gmyrek; Jakub Kucharz; Pawel Stelmasiak; Karol Nietupski; Katarzyna Ossolinska-Skurczynska; Michal Sobieszczuk; Tomasz Demkow; Pawel Wiechno Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Lars Lund; Harry Nisen; Petrus Järvinen; Magnus Fovaeus; Eirikur Gudmundsson; Bjarne Kromann-Andersen; Börje Ljungberg; Frode Nilsen; Pernilla Sundqvist; Peter E Clark; Christian Beisland Journal: Res Rep Urol Date: 2018-10-25