| Literature DB >> 31768685 |
Elżbieta Żbikowska1, Anna Marszewska2, Anna Cichy1, Julita Templin1, Anna Smorąg1, Tomasz Strzała3.
Abstract
Parasite diagnostics were carried out on 11 Polish populations of Cepaea spp. In three of them, coming from the roadside ditches of a village (Rytel, northern Poland), very high (up to 60%) prevalence of Brachylaima mesostoma was observed. This study provides the first molecular evidence of the presence of B. mesostoma inside Cepaea spp. in Europe. In a few snails from a population found in a private garden in a small town (Chełmża, northern Poland), larvae of Brachylecithum sp. were present. Cercariae and/or metacercariae of B. mesostoma were observed in both species of Cepaea: C. hortensis and C. nemoralis, whereas larvae of Brachylecithum sp. were found only in C. nemoralis. Both species of parasites inhabited snail hepatopancreas whose structure was significantly damaged by larvae. There was no significant connection between parasite invasion and snail host morphotype. The research did not allow the reasons for the high prevalence of B. mesostoma in Cepaea spp. to be explained, and also did not explicitly indicate how the parasite invaded Cepaea spp. individuals making them, at the same time a second intermediate host. However, it poses important questions about the life cycle of the parasite that may threaten extensively kept small-size farms of poultry.Entities:
Keywords: Brachylaima mesostoma; Brachylecithum sp.; Cepaea hortensis; Cepaea nemoralis; Prevalence; Shell morph
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31768685 PMCID: PMC6941998 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-019-06516-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Fig. 1Study sites: 1—Bytoń, 2—Chełmża, 3—Rytel, 4—Toruń
Number of collected Cepaea spp. and their infection [%]
| Sampling area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of collected | % of infected | No. of collected | % of infected | |
| Bytoń I | 64 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Chełmża I | 75 | 2.67a | 0 | – |
| Chełmża II | 132 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Rytel I | 49 | 44.9b | 15 | 33.33b |
| Rytel II | 41 | 53.66b | 20 | 60b |
| Rytel III | 93 | 47.31b | 49 | 26.53b |
| Toruń I | 67 | 0 | 32 | 0 |
| Toruń II | 77 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Toruń III | 51 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Toruń IV | 50 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
| Toruń V | 60 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
| Sum | 759 | 11.86 | 175 | 17.14 |
aBrachylecitum sp.
bBrachylaima mesostoma
Fig. 2Recorded Digenea: a cercariae and sporocysts of Brachylaima mesostoma, b metacercariae of Brachylaima mesostoma, c metacercariae of Brachylecithum sp., d cercariae of Brachylecithum sp.
Fig. 3Bayesian phylogenetic tree presenting systematic position of analysed DNA sample (sample is indicated with a star). Sequences of Alaria mustelae were used as outgroup for rooting. Numbers along node are posterior probability values and bootstrap value for nodes significance
Fig. 4Photomicrographs of hepatopancreas of Cepaea sp. a naturally infected with metacercariae of Brachylaima mesostoma (H—hepatopancreatic tubules separated by connective tissues; Tep—tubule epithelial cells bound the lesion; N—cell nucleus; S—separation of cells), b with magnified metacercariae (M—metacercariae of B. mesostoma)
Morphotypes of collected Cepaea spp. from study areas
| Morphotypes | % of collected | % of collected | % of collected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Y 00000 | 2.50 | 5.14 | 3 |
| Y 00300 | 30.96 | 34.86 | 31.69 |
| Y 00345 | 1.84 | 1.14 | 1.71 |
| Y 12345 | 11.33 | 19.43 | 12.85 |
| Y 123 (45) | 6.19 | 4.57 | 5.89 |
| Y (12)345 | 0.13 | 0 | 0.11 |
| Y (12)3(45) | 2.24 | 1.14 | 2.03 |
| Y (123)(45) | 0.13 | 0 | 0.11 |
| Y (12345) | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.64 |
| P 00000 | 3.16 | 10.29 | 4.5 |
| P 00300 | 17.13 | 13.71 | 16.49 |
| P 00345 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 1.07 |
| P 12345 | 2.63 | 2.86 | 2.68 |
| P 12(345) | 1.05 | 0 | 0.86 |
| P 123(45) | 1.98 | 0 | 1.61 |
| P (12)345 | 0.13 | 0 | 0.11 |
| P (12)3(45) | 3.43 | 0 | 2.78 |
| P (123)(45) | 0.26 | 0 | 0.21 |
| P (12345) | 1.71 | 0 | 1.39 |
| B 00000 | 3.56 | 4 | 3.64 |
| B 00300 | 6.46 | 1.14 | 5.46 |
| B 12345 | 0.26 | 0 | 0.21 |
| B 123(45) | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.32 |
| B (12)3(45) | 0.26 | 0 | 0.21 |
| B (123)(45) | 0.13 | 0 | 0.11 |
| B (12345) | 0.39 | 0 | 0.32 |
Number of morphotypes of collected Cepaea spp. and their infection [%] from Rytel
| % of infected | % of infected colour of morphotypes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morphotypes | No. of collected | % of infected | No. of collected | % of infected | ||
| Y 00000 | 4 | 50 | 0 | – | 50 | 40.78 |
| Y 00300 | 66 | 43.94 | 31 | 41.93 | 43.3 | |
| Y 00456 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | |
| Y 12345 | 33 | 45.45 | 23 | 17.39 | 33.93 | |
| Y 123(45) | 9 | 77.78 | 5 | 0 | 50 | |
| Y (12)3(45) | 3 | 66.67 | 2 | 50 | 60 | |
| Y (12345) | 0 | – | 1 | – | 0 | |
| P 00000 | 10 | 60 | 8 | 75 | 66.67 | 51.32 |
| P 00300 | 27 | 44.44 | 8 | 37.5 | 42.86 | |
| P 12345 | 13 | 61.54 | 1 | 0 | 57.14 | |
| P 12(345) | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | |
| P 123(45) | 3 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | |
| P (12)3(45) | 3 | 100 | 0 | – | 100 | |
| P (123)(45) | 1 | 100 | 0 | – | 100 | |
| P (12345) | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | |
| B 00000 | 2 | 50 | 3 | 33.33 | 40 | 50 |
| B 00300 | 5 | 40 | 1 | 100 | 50 | |
| B 123(45) | 0 | – | 1 | 100 | 100 | |