Literature DB >> 33452465

The sources of variation for individual prey-to-predator size ratios.

Sara Magalhães1, Jordi Moya-Laraño2, Jorge F Henriques3,4, Mariángeles Lacava5, Celeste Guzmán2, Maria Pilar Gavín-Centol2, Dolores Ruiz-Lupión2, Eva De Mas2.   

Abstract

The relative body size at which predators are willing to attack prey, a key trait for predator-prey interactions, is usually considered invariant. However, this ratio can vary widely among individuals or populations. Identifying the range and origin of such variation is key to understanding the strength and constraints on selection in both predators and prey. Still, these sources of variation remain largely unknown. We filled this gap by measuring the genetic, maternal and environmental variation of the maximum prey-to-predator size ratio (PPSRmax) in juveniles of the wolf spider Lycosa fasciiventris using a paternal half-sib split-brood design, in which each male was paired with two females and the offspring reared in two food environments: poor and rich. Each juvenile spider was then sequentially offered crickets of decreasing size and the maximum prey size killed was determined. We also measured body size and body condition of spiders upon emergence and just before the trial. We found low, but significant heritability (h2 = 0.069) and dominance and common environmental variance (d2 + 4c2 = 0.056). PPSRmax was also partially explained by body condition (during trial) but there was no effect of the rearing food environment. Finally, a maternal correlation between body size early in life and PPSRmax indicated that offspring born larger were less predisposed to feed on larger prey later in life. Therefore, PPSRmax, a central trait in ecosystems, can vary widely and this variation is due to different sources, with important consequences for changes in this trait in the short and long terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33452465      PMCID: PMC8115045          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-00395-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  38 in total

1.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs.

Authors:  Ulrich Brose; Tomas Jonsson; Eric L Berlow; Philip Warren; Carolin Banasek-Richter; Louis-Félix Bersier; Julia L Blanchard; Thomas Brey; Stephen R Carpenter; Marie-France Cattin Blandenier; Lara Cushing; Hassan Ali Dawah; Tony Dell; Francois Edwards; Sarah Harper-Smith; Ute Jacob; Mark E Ledger; Neo D Martinez; Jane Memmott; Katja Mintenbeck; John K Pinnegar; Björn C Rall; Thomas S Rayner; Daniel C Reuman; Liliane Ruess; Werner Ulrich; Richard J Williams; Guy Woodward; Joel E Cohen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes.

Authors:  U Brose; R B Ehnes; B C Rall; O Vucic-Pestic; E L Berlow; S Scheu
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  The ecological causes of individual specialisation.

Authors:  Márcio S Araújo; Daniel I Bolnick; Craig A Layman
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 5.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Priyanga Amarasekare; Márcio S Araújo; Reinhard Bürger; Jonathan M Levine; Mark Novak; Volker H W Rudolf; Sebastian J Schreiber; Mark C Urban; David A Vasseur
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Genetic constraints on adaptation to a changing environment.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Can dominance genetic variance be ignored in evolutionary quantitative genetic analyses of wild populations?

Authors:  Barbara Class; Jon E Brommer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Preference for different prey allows the coexistence of several land planarians in areas of the Atlantic Forest.

Authors:  Piter Kehoma Boll; Ana Maria Leal-Zanchet
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Influence of intra- and interspecific variation in predator-prey body size ratios on trophic interaction strengths.

Authors:  Ross N Cuthbert; Ryan J Wasserman; Tatenda Dalu; Horst Kaiser; Olaf L F Weyl; Jaimie T A Dick; Arnaud Sentis; Michael W McCoy; Mhairi E Alexander
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.