| Literature DB >> 31768194 |
Miaoyin Dong1,2, Shuyang Wang1,3,2, Fuqiang Xu1,2, Junkai Wang4, Ning Yang5, Qiaoqiao Li1,2, Jihong Chen1,2, Wenjian Li1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficient utilization of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production has received increasing attention. Previous studies have investigated the pretreatment process of biomass, but the detailed enzymatic hydrolysis process of pretreated biomass remains largely unclear. Thus, this study investigated the pretreatment efficiency of dilute alkali, acid, hydrogen peroxide and its ultimate effects on enzymatic hydrolysis. Furthermore, to better understand the enzymatic digestion process of alkali-pretreated sweet sorghum straw (SSS), multimodal microscopy techniques were used to visualize the enzymatic hydrolysis process. RESULT: After pretreatment with alkali, an enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of 86.44% was obtained, which increased by 99.54% compared to the untreated straw (43.23%). The FTIR, XRD and SEM characterization revealed a sequence of microstructural changes occurring in plant cell walls after pretreatment, including the destruction of lignin-polysaccharide interactions, the increase of porosity and crystallinity, and reduction of recalcitrance. During the course of hydrolysis, the cellulase dissolved the cell walls in the same manner and the digestion firstly occurred from the middle of cell walls and then toward the cell wall corners. The CLSM coupled with fluorescent labeling demonstrated that the sclerenchyma cells and vascular bundles in natural SSS were highly lignified, which caused the nonproductive bindings of cellulase on lignin. However, the efficient delignification significantly increased the accessibility and digestibility of cellulase to biomass, thereby improving the saccharification efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Enzymatic hydrolysis process; Pretreatment; Structural characterization; Sweet sorghum straw; Visualization
Year: 2019 PMID: 31768194 PMCID: PMC6874820 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1613-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Chemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of sweet sorghum straw before and after pretreatment
| Samples | Chemical composition (%)a | Enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose | Hemicellulose | Lignin | ||
| Untreated [ | 37.74 ± 1.61 | 28.07 ± 1.12 | 21.48 ± 0.63 | 43.23 ± 0.9 |
| 2% NaOH [ | 71.36 ± 3.2 | 16.15 ± 0.84 | 6.29 ± 0.07 | 86.44 ± 3.42 |
| 2% H2SO4 | 57.80 ± 0.95 | 11.76 ± 0.27 | 17.83 ± 0.8 | 75.07 ± 1.08 |
| 10% H2O2 | 54.60 ± 2.46 | 24.53 ± 0.3 | 11.57 ± 0.19 | 66.60 ± 1.37 |
aBased on dry weight of samples
Fig. 1FTIR spectroscopy of SSS after pretreatment (a) and enzymatic hydrolysis (b)
Fig. 2XRD images of SSS after pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis
Crystallinity indices of SSS undergoing pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis
| Samples | Crystallinity index (CrI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | Enzymatic hydrolysis | |
| Untreated | 45.50 | 53.90 |
| 2% NaOH | 69.30 | 77.47 |
| 2% H2SO4 | 66.45 | 71.68 |
| 10% H2O2 | 53.06 | 64.95 |
Fig. 3SEM images (×1000 magnification) of sweet sorghum straw. a Untreated. b–d NaOH, H2SO4 and H2O2 pretreated, respectively. e Untreated and enzyme hydrolyzed. f–h NaOH, H2SO4 and H2O2 pretreated and enzyme hydrolyzed, respectively. Scale bars: 100 µm
Fig. 5CLSM images of transverse section (10 µm in thickness). a The autofluorescence and dye-labeled fluorescence of cell walls (vascular bundle area) with or without alkali pretreatment. b The relative fluorescence intensities of dye-labeled cellulase and autofluorescence of samples at the same conditions, which were expressed as percentages compared with the intensities of fluorescence in untreated samples that were designated as 100%, respectively. c The changes in intensity of dye-labeled fluorescence between the corner (red arrows) and middle (white arrows) of alkali-pretreated parenchyma cell wall after hydrolysis of 1 h. Scale bars: 50 µm
Fig. 4Alkali-pretreated sweet sorghum straw (transverse section, 20 µm in thickness) imaged in real time during enzymatic hydrolysis at room temperature (enzyme loading: 9 IU/g substrate). Image a–f were recorded with time intervals of 60 min using bright-field light microscopy. Pc parenchyma cells, VB vascular bundles, Sc sclerenchyma cells, St sieve tube. Scale bars: 50 µm