| Literature DB >> 35658919 |
Miaoyin Dong1,2, Shuyang Wang3,4,5, Fuqiang Xu1,2, Guoqing Xiao6,7, Jin Bai1,2, Junkai Wang8, Xisi Sun1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The major challenge of facing the efficient utilization of biomass is the high cost of cellulolytic enzyme, while the Trichoderma longibrachiatum plays an essential role in the production of industrial enzymes and biomass recycling.Entities:
Keywords: Cellulase; Hyper-producing mutants; Proteomics; Transcriptomics; Trichoderma longibrachiatum
Year: 2022 PMID: 35658919 PMCID: PMC9166314 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02161-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod ISSN: 2731-3654
Fig.1Growth of T. longibrachiatum LC and its cellulase hyper-producing mutants (LC-M4 and LC-M16) on agar plates after 3 days of incubation. A Comparison of colony diameters between T. longibrachiatum LC, LC-M4 and LC-M16; B photographs of T. longibrachiatum colonies on avicel and CMC-Na plates. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Error bar standard deviation of three replicates
Fig.2Enzyme activities of FPase, CMCase, β-glucosidase, pNPCase, Xylanase and soluble protein concentration in supernatant after 192 h of fermentation by the wild-type strains of T. longibrachiatum LC and its mutants of LC-M4 and LC-M16. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Error bar standard deviation of three replicates
Summary of genes and proteins identified from the RNA-Seq and MS data
| Terms | Transcriptome | Proteome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC-M4_ LC | LC-M16_ LC | LC-M4_ LC | LC-M16_ LC | |
| Total genes/proteins | 11616 | 11616 | 1374 | 1374 |
| DEGs/DEPs | 2620 | 2709 | 330 | 338 |
| Up-regulated | 1133 | 1370 | 202 | 188 |
| Down-regulated | 1487 | 1339 | 128 | 150 |
| Co-expressed genes/proteins | 1100 | 1159 | 1100 | 1159 |
| Co-expressed DEGs-DEPs | 127 | 140 | 127 | 140 |
Fig.3Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes using GO and KEGG pathways in the T. longibrachiatum wild type and mutant strains. A, B The analysis results of GO of LC-M4_LC and LC-M16_LC, respectively; C, D the analysis results of KEGG of LC-M4_LC and LC-M16_LC, respectively
Summary of transcription factors up/down-regulated in T. longibrachiatum mutants of LC-M4 and LC-M16 vs LC
| Gene_ID | log2FC | Padj | Gene description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LC-M4 vs LC | |||
| M440DRAFT_1394263 | 0.9418 | 1.36E–16 | Xylanase regulator 1 |
| M440DRAFT_1389588 | − 1.1014 | 5.09E–12 | Fungal-specific transcription factor domain-containing protein |
| M440DRAFT_1389710 | − 1.8322 | 0.022146 | Basic leucine zipper transcription factor domain-containing protein |
| M440DRAFT_1427075 | − 2.5259 | 2.26E–89 | Dolichol phosphate-mannose biosynthesis regulatory |
| M440DRAFT_1441016 | 3.7983 | 1.10E–77 | N-terminal fungal transcription regulatory domain-containing protein |
| M440DRAFT_69088 | − 1.1739 | 4.88E–24 | Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory B subunit |
| M440DRAFT_1327308 | − 1.0717 | 1.36E–12 | G-protein signaling regulator protein |
| LC-M16 vs LC | |||
| M440DRAFT_1394263 | 1.4284 | 5.68E–23 | Xylanase regulator 1 |
| M440DRAFT_1441016 | 2.9991 | 2.46E–63 | N-terminal fungal transcription regulatory domain-containing protein |
| M440DRAFT_1327308 | − 1.1587 | 5.54E–16 | G-protein signaling regulator protein |
| M440DRAFT_1427075 | − 1.9314 | 3.61E–36 | Dolichol phosphate-mannose biosynthesis regulatory |
| M440DRAFT_1199307 | 1.0783 | 1.05E–11 | Transcription factor-like protein |
| M440DRAFT_1441655 | − 1.2298 | 9.63E–10 | Basic-leucine zipper transcription factor |
Fig.4Functional annotations of differentially expressed proteins using GO and KEGG pathways in the T. longibrachiatum wild type and mutant strains. A, B The analysis results of GO of LC-M4_LC and LC-M16_LC, respectively; C, D the analysis results of KEGG of LC-M4_LC and LC-M16_LC, respectively
Fig. 5The correlations analysis of RNA-Seq and proteins in T. longibrachiatum strains. Venn diagram of all detected mRNA and proteins in LC-M4_LC (A) and LC-M16_LC (B), respectively. KEGG pathway annotation analysis of co-regulated DEGs/DEPs in LC-M4_LC (C) and LC-M16_LC (D), respectively
Fig. 6The hypothetical secretory model of cellulase protein in filamentous fungi