Literature DB >> 31767436

Cost-Utility Analysis of Glaucoma Medication Adherence.

Paula Anne Newman-Casey1, Mariam Salman2, Paul P Lee2, Justin D Gatwood3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The majority of patients with glaucoma do not take their medications as prescribed. Estimates of the cost-utility value of adherence to prescribed glaucoma medication are vital to implement potentially effective interventions.
DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis using Monte Carlo microsimulations incorporating a series of Markov cycles (10 000 iterations per strategy). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with glaucoma aged ≥40 years with a full lifetime horizon (up to 60 years).
METHODS: The analysis estimated glaucomatous progression on the basis of data from the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study. Participants with glaucoma entered the model at age 40 years with a mean deviation in the better-seeing eye of -1.4±-1.9 decibels (dB) and -4.3±-3.4 dB in the worse-seeing eye. Participants whose glaucoma worsened each year accumulate -0.8 dB loss compared with -0.1 dB loss for those who remained stable. Data from the Glaucoma Laser Trial and the Tube versus Trabeculectomy Studies were used to assign probabilities of worsening disease among treated patients. Claims data estimating rates of glaucoma medication adherence over 4 years were used to assign probability of adherence. Those with poor adherence were modeled as having outcomes similar to the placebo arm of the clinical trials. As patients' mean deviation deteriorated, they transitioned between health states from mild (≥-6 dB), to moderate (<-6 to ≥-12 dB), to severe glaucoma (<-12 to ≥23 dB), to unilateral (<-20 dB) and bilateral blindness. At each health state, patients incurred the costs of treatment and established health utilities; ultimately, societal costs of low vision and blindness were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of glaucoma medication adherence.
RESULTS: Beginning at an initial glaucoma diagnosis at age 40 years, patients proceeded to single-eye blindness as early as 19 years among those who were nonadherent and 23 years for those remaining adherent. Total healthcare costs for adherent patients averaged $62 782 (standard deviation [SD], 34 107), and those for nonadherent patients averaged $52 722 (SD, 38 868). Nonadherent patients had a mean loss of 0.34 QALYs, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $29 600 per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION: At a conservative willingness to pay of $50 000/QALY, there is room to expand services to improve patient adherence.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31767436      PMCID: PMC7145750          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  43 in total

Review 1.  What is the price of life and why doesn't it increase at the rate of inflation?

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Richard A Hirth; Michael E Chernew; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-07-28

2.  Patterns of Glaucoma Medication Adherence over Four Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Taylor Blachley; Paul P Lee; Michele Heisler; Karen B Farris; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of brimonidine and latanoprost in adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a three-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group trial.

Authors:  H B DuBiner; M Mroz; A M Shapiro; M S Dirks
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study.

Authors:  David C Musch; Brenda W Gillespie; Leslie M Niziol; Paul R Lichter; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb; Catey Bunce; Gerassimos Lascaratos; Francesca Amalfitano; Nitin Anand; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Rupert R Bourne; David C Broadway; Ian A Cunliffe; Jeremy P Diamond; Scott G Fraser; Tuan A Ho; Keith R Martin; Andrew I McNaught; Anil Negi; Krishna Patel; Richard A Russell; Ameet Shah; Paul G Spry; Katsuyoshi Suzuki; Edward T White; Richard P Wormald; Wen Xing; Thierry G Zeyen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma .

Authors:  K Nouri-Mahdavi; L Brigatti; M Weitzman; J Caprioli
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Benita O'Colmain; Caroline C W Klaver; Ronald Klein; Beatriz Muñoz; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

8.  Evaluation of Glaucoma Progression in Large-Scale Clinical Data: The Japanese Archive of Multicentral Databases in Glaucoma (JAMDIG).

Authors:  Yuri Fujino; Ryo Asaoka; Hiroshi Murata; Atsuya Miki; Masaki Tanito; Shiro Mizoue; Kazuhiko Mori; Katsuyoshi Suzuki; Takehiro Yamashita; Kenji Kashiwagi; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Self-reported visual impairment in elderly Canadians and its impact on healthy living.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Jin; David T Wong
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.882

10.  Long-term trends in glaucoma-related blindness in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  Mehrdad Malihi; Edney R Moura Filho; David O Hodge; Arthur J Sit
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  6 in total

1.  A novel EyePhone© App for improving adherence to glaucoma therapy.

Authors:  Ari Leshno; Dan Gaton; Reut Singer; Elior Eliasi; Ofri Vorobichik-Berar; Shiran Madgar; Ori Stern; Wasim Jaber; Noa Kapelushnik; Alon Skaat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  CRISPR-Cas9 Disruption of Aquaporin 1: An Alternative to Glaucoma Eye Drop Therapy?

Authors:  András M Komáromy
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  The Effect of Market Competition on the Price of Topical Eye Drops.

Authors:  Arjun Watane; Meghana Kalavar; Joshua Reyes; Nicolas A Yannuzzi; Jayanth Sridhar
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.975

Review 4.  Adherence to Therapy in Glaucoma Treatment-A Review.

Authors:  Alexandra-Cătălina Zaharia; Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu; Mădălina Radu; Roxana-Elena Rogoz
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Automated Direct Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: First Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mordechai Goldenfeld; Michael Belkin; Masha Dobkin-Bekman; Zachary Sacks; Sharon Blum Meirovitch; Noa Geffen; Ari Leshno; Alon Skaat
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  An Initiative to Improve Follow-up of Patients with Glaucoma.

Authors:  Calvin C Robbins; Sidrah Anjum; Amer Mosa Alwreikat; Michael Lee Cooper; Paul R Cotran; Shiyoung Roh; David J Ramsey
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.