Literature DB >> 25533656

Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial.

David F Garway-Heath1, David P Crabb2, Catey Bunce3, Gerassimos Lascaratos3, Francesca Amalfitano3, Nitin Anand4, Augusto Azuara-Blanco5, Rupert R Bourne6, David C Broadway7, Ian A Cunliffe8, Jeremy P Diamond9, Scott G Fraser10, Tuan A Ho3, Keith R Martin11, Andrew I McNaught12, Anil Negi8, Krishna Patel3, Richard A Russell13, Ameet Shah3, Paul G Spry9, Katsuyoshi Suzuki3, Edward T White3, Richard P Wormald3, Wen Xing3, Thierry G Zeyen14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatments for open-angle glaucoma aim to prevent vision loss through lowering of intraocular pressure, but to our knowledge no placebo-controlled trials have assessed visual function preservation, and the observation periods of previous (unmasked) trials have typically been at least 5 years. We assessed vision preservation in patients given latanoprost compared with those given placebo.
METHODS: In this randomised, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma at ten UK centres (tertiary referral centres, teaching hospitals, and district general hospitals). Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) with a website-generated randomisation schedule, stratified by centre and with a permuted block design, to receive either latanoprost 0·005% (intervention group) or placebo (control group) eye drops. Drops were administered from identical bottles, once a day, to both eyes. The primary outcome was time to visual field deterioration within 24 months. Analyses were done in all individuals with follow-up data. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) recommended stopping the trial on Jan 6, 2011 (last patient visit July, 2011), after an interim analysis, and suggested a change in primary outcome from the difference in proportions of patients with incident progression between groups to time to visual field deterioration within 24 months. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN96423140.
FINDINGS: We enrolled 516 individuals between Dec 1, 2006, and March 16, 2010. Baseline mean intraocular pressure was 19·6 mm Hg (SD 4·6) in 258 patients in the latanoprost group and 20·1 mm Hg (4·8) in 258 controls. At 24 months, mean reduction in intraocular pressure was 3·8 mm Hg (4·0) in 231 patients assessed in the latanoprost group and 0·9 mm Hg (3·8) in 230 patients assessed in the placebo group. Visual field preservation was significantly longer in the latanoprost group than in the placebo group: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0·44 (95% CI 0·28-0·69; p=0·0003). We noted 18 serious adverse events, none attributable to the study drug.
INTERPRETATION: This is the first randomised placebo-controlled trial to show preservation of the visual field with an intraocular-pressure-lowering drug in patients with open-angle glaucoma. The study design enabled significant differences in vision to be assessed in a relatively short observation period. FUNDING: Pfizer, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.
Copyright © 2015 Garway-Heath et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25533656     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62111-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  160 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Jan Luebke; L Bryniok; M Neuburger; J F Jordan; D Boehringer; T Reinhard; T Wecker; A Anton
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Glaucoma Medication Adherence.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Mariam Salman; Paul P Lee; Justin D Gatwood
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

Authors:  T Boodhna; L J Saunders; D P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Evaluation of Visual Field and Imaging Outcomes for Glaucoma Clinical Trials (An American Ophthalomological Society Thesis).

Authors:  David F Garway-Heath; Ana Quartilho; Philip Prah; David P Crabb; Qian Cheng; Haogang Zhu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2017-08-22

5.  Increased bioavailability of cyclic guanylate monophosphate prevents retinal ganglion cell degeneration.

Authors:  Lauren K Wareham; Ana C Dordea; Grigorij Schleifer; Vincent Yao; Annabelle Batten; Fei Fei; Joseph Mertz; Meredith Gregory-Ksander; Louis R Pasquale; Emmanuel S Buys; Rebecca M Sappington
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.996

6.  From Machine to Machine: An OCT-Trained Deep Learning Algorithm for Objective Quantification of Glaucomatous Damage in Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Alessandro A Jammal; Atalie C Thompson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  A Glaucoma-Specific Brief Motivational Interviewing Training Program for Ophthalmology Para-professionals: Assessment of Feasibility and Initial Patient Impact.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Olivia Killeen; Sarah Miller; Chamisa MacKenzie; Leslie M Niziol; Ken Resnicow; John W Creswell; Paul Cook; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-12-20

8.  Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of travoprost and latanoprost for the management of open-angle glaucoma given as an evening dose.

Authors:  Jing Li; Xiaoyi Wang; Guihua Xu; Ruidong Deng; Laiwei Wu; Liqin Zhang; Zilin Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Ophthalmology research in the UK's National Health Service: the structure and performance of the NIHR's Ophthalmology research portfolio.

Authors:  Sarah R Dawson; Emma Linton; Kris Beicher; Richard Gale; Praveen Patel; Faruque Ghanchi; Michael W Beresford; Vanessa Poustie; Usha Chakravarthy; Rupert R A Bourne
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  A view on glaucoma--are we seeing it clearly?

Authors:  D P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.