| Literature DB >> 31766547 |
Lingzhan Miao1, Song Guo1, Zhilin Liu1, Songqi Liu1, Guoxiang You1, Hao Qu1, Jun Hou1.
Abstract
Nanoplastic (NP) contamination is becoming a pervasive issue as NPs, originating from microplastic particles, pose potentially harmful environmental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. The environmental hazards of NPs on microorganisms have been well documented in recent studies; however, little is known about their ecotoxicity effects on freshwater biofilms, which serve as important primary producers and decomposers and are highly connected with other ecosystem components. We investigated the effects of NPs on the microbial metabolic functions of freshwater biofilms in terms of carbon source utilization ability. Biofilm samples were collected, cultivated in a hydrodynamic flume for six weeks, and then exposed in polystyrene (PS) beads (100 nm in size) with different NP concentrations (1, 5, and 10 mg/L). BIOLOG ECO microplates were used to quantify carbon source utilization characteristics. The data were analyzed using average well-color development (AWCD), functional diversity indices, and principle component analysis (PCA). Results showed that the total carbon metabolic functions (represented by AWCD) remained constant (p > 0.05) with elevated NP concentrations, but some specific carbon sources (e.g., esters) changed in their utilization ability (p < 0.05). The microbial functional diversity (Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Simpson diversity index, and Shannon evenness index) was significantly reduced under 10 mg/L NPs (p < 0.05), indicating an inhibiting effect of NPs on biofilm metabolic diversity. This study examined NP ecotoxicity effects on microbial metabolic activities at the community level, but further studies are required to fully understand the mechanisms driving this change.Entities:
Keywords: AWCD; BIOLOG ECO microplate; biofilms; carbon source utilization; metabolic functions; nanoplastics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766547 PMCID: PMC6926673 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Particle size distribution and zeta potential of polystyrene beads.
| Primary Particle Size | Particle Size Distribution (nm) | Zeta Potential (mV) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milli-Q Water | Experimental Solution a | Milli-Q Water | Experimental Solution | |
| 100 nm | 129 ± 34 | 569 ± 124 * | −39.4 ± 3.9 | −19.4 ± 3.5 * |
a The experimental solution used here was filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane. * An asterisk indicates a significant difference in average diameter and zeta potential for the polystyrene (PS) beads in the experimental solution compared with those in Milli-Q water (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Average well-color development (AWCD) of all carbon sources. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between the PS-introduced groups and the control.
Figure 2The AWCD by biochemical categories. Only the AWCD of esters reported significant differences (p < 0.05) between the experimental and control groups. The letters of each column represent a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Nanoplastic (NP)-introduced aquatic PCA ordination showing the microbial community carbon source utilization patterns (CSUPs). CG represents the control group. The cos2 values are used to estimate the quality of the representation. The closer a variable is to the circle of correlations, the better its representation on the factor map and the more important it is for interpreting these components.
Figure 4The carbon utilization pattern of 31 specific carbon sources by the freshwater biofilm microbial community exposed to an NP-introduced environment. Light blue indicates low carbon source usage by the microbial community and darker shades of blue indicate higher usage.
The metabolic functional diversity indices indicating that significant differences only occurred in the 10 mg/L NP group compared to the control in terms of H’, D, E and D. H’ stands for Shannon–Wiener diversity index, D stands for Simpson diversity index, E stands for Shannon evenness index, D stands for McIntosh index. Data in the table are the mean ± variance, n = 3. Using Duncan’s multiple range test of diversity indices separately, different letters (a/b) in each index represent the significant difference at p < 0.05.
| PS Concentration | H′ | D | E | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mg/L | 3.36 ± 0.012a | 0.964 ± 0.001a | 2.275 ± 0.008a | 0.838 ± 0.028a |
| 1 mg/L | 3.347 ± 0.017a | 0.963 ± 0.001a | 2.281 ± 0.01a | 0.82 ± 0.012a |
| 5 mg/L | 3.376 ± 0.009a | 0.964 ± 0a | 2.271 ± 0.01a | 0.815 ± 0.003a |
| 10 mg/L | 3.318 ± 0.041b | 0.961 ± 0.002b | 2.239 ± 0.021b | 0.832 ± 0.01a |