| Literature DB >> 31766194 |
Arli Guadalupe Zárate-Ortiz1, Alida Melse-Boonstra1, Sonia Rodríguez-Ramírez2, Sonia Hernández-Cordero3, Edith J M Feskens1.
Abstract
Mexico is facing the double burden of malnutrition, and adolescents are not an exception. Diet plays an important role, both in causing overweight and undernutrition. This study aimed to describe the dietary patterns (DPs) of Mexican adolescents and to examine its association with nutritional status using data from adolescents aged 12-19 years (n = 7380) from the National Survey of Health and Nutrition (ENSANUT-2006). Principal component analysis was used to derivate the DPs. Associations between DP and nutritional status were determined by prevalence ratio (PR). Four DPs were identified: nontraditional and breakfast-type, Western, plant-based, and protein-rich. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was higher in adolescents who scored high on the Western pattern (PR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.08-1.21) or on the plant-based pattern (PR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17). The Western pattern was positively associated with anemia in girls (PR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.35), while the nontraditional and breakfast-type pattern was inversely associated with anemia in adolescents aged 12-15 years (PR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.76-0.99) and in girls (PR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97). The Western and plant-based patterns were simultaneously associated with overweight-obesity and at least one indicator of undernutrition. In the context of the double burden of malnutrition, dietary advice must consider malnutrition in all its forms.Entities:
Keywords: adolescence; anemia; dietary patterns; double burden; malnutrition; overweight and obesity; stunting
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766194 PMCID: PMC6893405 DOI: 10.3390/nu11112753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Selection process of study population. “N” represents the expanded sample. The sample of 7380 subjects represented 7,078,490 adolescents, while the subsample of 7080 subjects represented 6,868,671 adolescents. y = year; BMI = body mass index; EI:BMR = energy intake/basal metabolic rate ratio.
Sociodemographic characteristics and nutritional status of Mexican adolescents from ENSANUT-2006.
| Girls | Boys | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12–15 Years | 16–19 Years | 12–15 Years | 16–19 Years | |||
| Age Median (Range) | 13.5 | 17.5 | 13.5 | 17.5 | ||
| Socioeconomic level (%) | 0.38 | 0.08 | ||||
| Low | 48.9 | 48.1 | 48.5 | 43.2 | ||
| Medium | 32.9 | 31.2 | 31.0 | 31.8 | ||
| High | 18.2 | 20.8 | 20.5 | 25.0 | ||
| Area of living | 0.12 | 0.07 | ||||
| Urban | 56.5 | 59.9 | 57.1 | 61.8 | ||
| Region | 0.27 | 0.06 | ||||
| North | 13.1 | 11.9 | 11.3 | 15.2 | ||
| Centre | 45.5 | 48.7 | 48.6 | 46.3 | ||
| South | 48.6 | 39.4 | 40.1 | 38.6 | ||
| Weight status (%) | 0.86 | 0.015 | ||||
| Thinness | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.1 | ||
| Normal weight | 66.6 | 67.2 | 67.2 | 71.8 | ||
| Overweight/Obese | 31.9 | 31.1 | 30.3 | 26.2 | ||
| Stunting (%) | 13.8 | 21.1 | < 0.0001 | 14.3 | 19.2 | 0.012 |
| Stunted subjects with overweight–obesity (%) £ | 25.0 | 31.2 | 19.2 | 25.2 | ||
| Anemia (%) ₰ | 10.2 | 10.8 | 0.67 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 0.005 |
| Anemic subjects with overweight–obesity (%) ꜜ | 40.2 | 30.2 | 33.5 | 24.0 | ||
Sample size: 7380; expansion factor: 7,078,490; ₰ sample size: 7080; expansion factor: 6,868,671. Anemia was estimated with hemoglobin concentration adjusted for geographic altitude; £ proportion of overweight–obesity among stunted subjects; ꜜ proportion of overweight–obesity among subjects with anemia.
Factor loading matrix for the four dietary patterns and their food groups.
| Food Group | Average Intake (g/day) | Nontraditional and Breakfast-Type | Western | Plant-Based | Protein-Rich |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tortilla | 194.5 | −0.51 | |||
| Other cereals | 29.6 | 0.33 | |||
| Breakfast cereals | 5.0 | 0.63 | |||
| Maize-based food | 50.2 | 0.36 | |||
| Fast-food | 5.1 | 0.34 | |||
| Legumes | 74.3 | 0.58 | |||
| Fruit | 186.2 | 0.54 | |||
| Vegetables | 63.8 | 0.50 | |||
| Poultry and red meat | 47.1 | 0.31 | |||
| Fish and seafood | 8.3 | ||||
| Charcuterie | 8.3 | 0.49 | |||
| Milk * | 166.8 | 0.66 | |||
| Eggs | 31.4 | 0.51 | |||
| Fat | 1.9 | 0.40 | |||
| Sweets | 24.7 | 0.35 | |||
| Cookies | 202.7 | ||||
| Salty snacks | 9.0 | 0.55 | |||
| Industrialized sweet drinks * | 262.6 | 0.63 | |||
| Nonindustrialized sweet drinks * | 256.2 | 0.53 | |||
| Dairy | 33.5 | 0.37 | |||
| Sandwich | 21.6 | 0.30 | 0.36 | ||
| Fried vegetarian dishes | 6.6 | 0.36 | |||
| Sweet bakery | 27.3 | 0.31 | |||
| Soup | 66.3 | 0.50 | |||
| Pasta and rice | 23.7 | 0.57 | |||
| Nuts and avocado | 7.5 | 0.40 |
Values from −0.30 through to 0.30 were excluded for simplicity in the interpretation. Average intake was calculated for each food item as the mean in grams per day. * (mL/d).
Correlation coefficients between dietary patterns and nutritional content.
| Nontraditional and Breakfast-Type | Western | Plant-Based | Protein-Rich | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EI:BMR ratio | −0.04 * | 0.29 * | 0.48 * | 0.29 * |
| Energy (kcal) | −0.04 * | 0.36 * | 0.47 * | 0.33 * |
| Protein (% energy) | 0.38 * | −0.05 * | −0.09 * | 0.27 * |
| Fat (% energy) | 0.32 * | 0.43 * | −0.03 * | 0.13 * |
| CHO’s (% energy) | −0.37 * | −0.36 * | 0.05 * | −0.18 * |
| Fiber (g) | −0.30 * | −0.02 * | 0.41 * | 0.37 * |
| Sugar (g) | 0.15 * | 0.38 * | 0.23 * | −0.01 |
| Ca (mg) | 0.15 * | 0.06 * | 0.38 * | 0.20 * |
| Fe (mg) | −0.06 * | 0.26 * | 0.37 * | 0.35 * |
| Zn (mg) | 0.11 * | 0.31 * | 0.38 * | 0.39 * |
| Vit C (mg) | 0.18 * | −0.03 * | 0.51 * | 0.16 * |
| Vit A (IU) | 0.25 * | −0.04 * | 0.49 * | 0.23 * |
| Vit B12 (mg) | 0.40 * | 0.33 * | 0.26 * | 0.23 * |
* Significant at p-value 0.01.
Adjusted prevalence ratios of overweight and obesity for dietary patterns among Mexican adolescents.
| Dietary Pattern | Total * | 12–15 years ₰ | 16–19 years ₰ | Boys ¥ | Girls ¥ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nontraditional and breakfast-type | 1.03 (0.97–1.10) | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) | 0.91 (0.83–1.00) | 1.01 (0.93–1.11) | 1.05 (0.97–1.14) |
| Western | 1.15 (1.08–1.21) | 1.14 (1.06–1.22) | 1.05 (0.95–1.16) | 1.23 (1.12–1.34) | 1.08 (0.99–1.18) |
| Plant-based | 1.10 (1.03–1.17) | 1.20 (1.11–1.30) | 1.04 (0.92–1.17) | 1.07 (0.97–1.18) | 1.12 (1.04–1.22) |
| Protein-rich | 1.02 (0.95–1.09) | 0.97 (0.96–1.03) | 1.05 (0.95–1.16) | 1.06 (0.98–1.15) | 0.98 (0.91–1.05) |
All prevalence ratios were calculated per quartile of dietary pattern scores. * Model adjusted for sex, living area, socioeconomic status, region, age, and EI:BMR ratio. ₰ Model adjusted for sex, living area, socioeconomic status, region, and EI:BMR ratio. ¥ Model adjusted for living area, socioeconomic status, region, age, and EI:BMR ratio.
Prevalence ratios of anemia among Mexican adolescents across dietary patterns.
| Dietary Pattern | Total * | 12–15 years ₰ | 16–19 years ₰ | Boys ¥ | Girls ¥ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nontraditional and breakfast-type | 0.91 (0.81–1.01) | 0.87 (0.76–0.99) | 0.96 (0.80–1.16) | 0.87 (0.76–0.99) | 0.83 (0.73–0.96) |
| Western | 1.11 (0.98–1.26) | 1.11 (0.94–1.30) | 1.13 (0.92–1.38) | 1.11 (0.94–1.30) | 1.24 (1.06–1.45) |
| Plant-based | 0.99 (0.88–1.11) | 1.04 (0.89–1.22) | 0.87 (0.76–1.01) | 1.04 (0.89–1.22) | 0.96 (0.84–1.09) |
| Protein-rich | 1.02 (0.92–1.12) | 1.09 (0.95–1.25) | 0.92 (0.79–1.06) | 1.09 (0.95–1.25) | 0.93 (0.83–1.05) |
A subsample of 7080 subjects counted with hemoglobin data. Hemoglobin concentrations were adjusted for geographic altitude. All prevalence ratios were calculated per quartile of dietary pattern scores. * Model adjusted for sex, living area, socioeconomic status, region, age, and BMI-for-age Z-score (BAZ). ₰ Model adjusted for sex, living area, socioeconomic status, region, and BAZ. ¥ Model adjusted for living area, socioeconomic status, region, age, and BAZ.
Adjusted prevalence ratios of stunting among Mexican adolescents across dietary patterns.
| Dietary Pattern | Total * | 12–15 years ₰ | 16–19 years ₰ | Boys ¥ | Girls ¥ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nontraditional and breakfast-type | 0.88 (0.81–0.95) | 0.90 (0.80–1.00) | 0.85 (0.77–0.95) | 0.89 (0.81–0.97) | 0.86 (0.77–1.03) |
| Western | 0.86 (0.80–0.92) | 0.88 (0.80–0.97) | 0.85 (0.76–0.96) | 0.81 (0.74–0.89) | 0.93 (0.83–1.03) |
| Plant-based | 0.85 (0.79–0.92) | 0.80 (0.71–0.90) | 0.90 (0.80–1.02) | 0.80 (0.71–0.90) | 0.80 (0.72–0.89) |
| Protein-rich | 0.96 (0.90–1.02) | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 1.00 (0.91–1.10) | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | 0.98 (0.90–1.07) |
All prevalence ratios were calculated per quartile of dietary pattern scores. * Model adjusted for sex, living area, socioeconomic status, region, age, and EI:BMR ratio. ₰ Model adjusted for sex, living area, socioeconomic status, region, and EI:BMR ratio. ¥ Model adjusted for living area, socioeconomic status, region, age, and EI:BMR ratio.