Literature DB >> 31762535

Reproducibility Evaluation of SLANT Whole Brain Segmentation Across Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols.

Yunxi Xiong1, Yuankai Huo2, Jiachen Wang1, L Taylor Davis3, Maureen McHugo4, Bennett A Landman1,2,3.   

Abstract

Whole brain segmentation on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for understanding neuroanatomical-functional relationships. Traditionally, multi-atlas segmentation has been regarded as the standard method for whole brain segmentation. In past few years, deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) segmentation methods have demonstrated their advantages in both accuracy and computational efficiency. Recently, we proposed the spatially localized atlas network tiles (SLANT) method, which is able to segment a 3D MRI brain scan into 132 anatomical regions. Commonly, DCNN segmentation methods yield inferior performance under external validations, especially when the testing patterns were not presented in the training cohorts. Recently, we obtained a clinically acquired, multi-sequence MRI brain cohort with 1480 clinically acquired, de-identified brain MRI scans on 395 patients using seven different MRI protocols. Moreover, each subject has at least two scans from different MRI protocols. Herein, we assess the SLANT method's intra- and inter-protocol reproducibility. SLANT achieved less than 0.05 coefficient of variation (CV) for intra-protocol experiments and less than 0.15 CV for inter-protocol experiments. The results show that the SLANT method achieved high intra- and inter- protocol reproducibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; SLANT; coefficient of variation; whole brain segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31762535      PMCID: PMC6874229          DOI: 10.1117/12.2512561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  6 in total

1.  Mapping Lifetime Brain Volumetry with Covariate-Adjusted Restricted Cubic Spline Regression from Cross-sectional Multi-site MRI.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Katherine Aboud; Hakmook Kang; Laurie E Cutting; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2016-10-02

2.  BrainSegNet: a convolutional neural network architecture for automated segmentation of human brain structures.

Authors:  Raghav Mehta; Aabhas Majumdar; Jayanthi Sivaswamy
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Simultaneous total intracranial volume and posterior fossa volume estimation using multi-atlas label fusion.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Asman; Andrew J Plassard; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  DeepNAT: Deep convolutional neural network for segmenting neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Christian Wachinger; Martin Reuter; Tassilo Klein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Statistical label fusion with hierarchical performance models.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Alexander S Dagley; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

6.  Multi-atlas learner fusion: An efficient segmentation approach for large-scale data.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Plassard; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 8.545

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Generalizing deep whole-brain segmentation for post-contrast MRI with transfer learning.

Authors:  Camilo Bermudez; Samuel W Remedios; Karthik Ramadass; Maureen McHugo; Stephan Heckers; Yuankai Huo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-23

2.  Generalizing Deep Whole Brain Segmentation for Pediatric and Post- Contrast MRI with Augmented Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Camilo Bermudez; Justin Blaber; Samuel W Remedios; Jess E Reynolds; Catherine Lebel; Maureen McHugo; Stephan Heckers; Yuankai Huo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.