Camilo Bermudez1, Samuel W Remedios2, Karthik Ramadass3, Maureen McHugo4, Stephan Heckers4, Yuankai Huo5, Bennett A Landman1,3,4. 1. Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 2. Henry Jackson Foundation, Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States. 3. Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 4. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 5. Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Generalizability is an important problem in deep neural networks, especially with variability of data acquisition in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently, the spatially localized atlas network tiles (SLANT) can effectively segment whole brain, non-contrast T1w MRI with 132 volumetric labels. Transfer learning (TL) is a commonly used domain adaptation tool to update the neural network weights for local factors, yet risks degradation of performance on the original validation/test cohorts. Approach: We explore TL using unlabeled clinical data to address these concerns in the context of adapting SLANT to scanning protocol variations. We optimize whole-brain segmentation on heterogeneous clinical data by leveraging 480 unlabeled pairs of clinically acquired T1w MRI with and without intravenous contrast. We use labels generated on the pre-contrast image to train on the post-contrast image in a five-fold cross-validation framework. We further validated on a withheld test set of 29 paired scans over a different acquisition domain. Results: Using TL, we improve reproducibility across imaging pairs measured by the reproducibility Dice coefficient (rDSC) between the pre- and post-contrast image. We showed an increase over the original SLANT algorithm (rDSC 0.82 versus 0.72) and the FreeSurfer v6.0.1 segmentation pipeline ( rDSC = 0.53 ). We demonstrate the impact of this work decreasing the root-mean-squared error of volumetric estimates of the hippocampus between paired images of the same subject by 67%. Conclusion: This work demonstrates a pipeline for unlabeled clinical data to translate algorithms optimized for research data to generalize toward heterogeneous clinical acquisitions.
Purpose: Generalizability is an important problem in deep neural networks, especially with variability of data acquisition in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently, the spatially localized atlas network tiles (SLANT) can effectively segment whole brain, non-contrast T1w MRI with 132 volumetric labels. Transfer learning (TL) is a commonly used domain adaptation tool to update the neural network weights for local factors, yet risks degradation of performance on the original validation/test cohorts. Approach: We explore TL using unlabeled clinical data to address these concerns in the context of adapting SLANT to scanning protocol variations. We optimize whole-brain segmentation on heterogeneous clinical data by leveraging 480 unlabeled pairs of clinically acquired T1w MRI with and without intravenous contrast. We use labels generated on the pre-contrast image to train on the post-contrast image in a five-fold cross-validation framework. We further validated on a withheld test set of 29 paired scans over a different acquisition domain. Results: Using TL, we improve reproducibility across imaging pairs measured by the reproducibility Dice coefficient (rDSC) between the pre- and post-contrast image. We showed an increase over the original SLANT algorithm (rDSC 0.82 versus 0.72) and the FreeSurfer v6.0.1 segmentation pipeline ( rDSC = 0.53 ). We demonstrate the impact of this work decreasing the root-mean-squared error of volumetric estimates of the hippocampus between paired images of the same subject by 67%. Conclusion: This work demonstrates a pipeline for unlabeled clinical data to translate algorithms optimized for research data to generalize toward heterogeneous clinical acquisitions.
Authors: Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Jean C Augustinack; Khoa Nguyen; Christopher M Player; Allison Player; Michelle Wright; Nicole Roy; Matthew P Frosch; Ann C McKee; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce Fischl; Koen Van Leemput Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jean-Philippe Fortin; Drew Parker; Birkan Tunç; Takanori Watanabe; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; David R Roalf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Robert T Schultz; Ragini Verma; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hengameh Mirzaalian; Lipeng Ning; Peter Savadjiev; Ofer Pasternak; Sylvain Bouix; Oleg Michailovich; Sarina Karmacharya; Gerald Grant; Christine E Marx; Rajendra A Morey; Laura A Flashman; Mark S George; Thomas W McAllister; Norberto Andaluz; Lori Shutter; Raul Coimbra; Ross D Zafonte; Mike J Coleman; Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Murray B Stein; Martha E Shenton; Yogesh Rathi Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: R T Shinohara; J Oh; G Nair; P A Calabresi; C Davatzikos; J Doshi; R G Henry; G Kim; K A Linn; N Papinutto; D Pelletier; D L Pham; D S Reich; W Rooney; S Roy; W Stern; S Tummala; F Yousuf; A Zhu; N L Sicotte; R Bakshi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Velakoulis; C Pantelis; P D McGorry; P Dudgeon; W Brewer; M Cook; P Desmond; N Bridle; P Tierney; V Murrie; B Singh; D Copolov Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1999-02
Authors: Susanne G Mueller; Paul A Yushkevich; Sandhitsu Das; Lei Wang; Koen Van Leemput; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Kate Alpert; Adam Mezher; Peter Ng; Katrina Paz; Michael W Weiner Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.881