Literature DB >> 3175760

New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.

L L Wiltse1, C W Spencer.   

Abstract

The paraspinal approach was described by our group in 1968. It differs from the approach described by Melvin Watkins in 1953 in that it is a longitudinal separation of the sacrospinalis group between the multifidus and longissimus, and not between the lateral border of the entire sacrospinalis group and quadratus lumborum. Also, Watkins removed a flake of the iliac crest with muscles attached, which he swung cranially and medially. This article also describes several refinements not mentioned in the original article and gives several new uses for the approach. Specifically, its use for removing a far lateral disc, decompressing a far out syndrome, inserting pedicle screws, and for decompressing the opposite side from inside the vertebral canal is described.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3175760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  69 in total

1.  [SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation].

Authors:  B Rieger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Transverse process osteotomy for surgical drainage of primary iliopsoas abscess and secondary cases combined with spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Fady Michael Fahmy Ibrahim; Abd El-Rady Mahmoud Abd El-Rady
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Anatomical study of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Raphaël Vialle; C Court; N Khouri; E Olivier; L Miladi; J L Tassin; T Defives; J Dubousset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Eric Olivier; Julien Beldame; Mourad Ould Slimane; Thomas Defives; Fabrice Duparc
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years.

Authors:  Dietrich Schlenzka; Ville Remes; Ilkka Helenius; Tommi Lamberg; Pekka Tervahartiala; Timo Yrjönen; Kaj Tallroth; Kalevi Osterman; Seppo Seitsalo; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Operative treatment of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and mild isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: direct repair of the defect or segmental spinal fusion?

Authors:  D Schlenzka; S Seitsalo; M Poussa; K Osterman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Laminectomy combined with posterolateral stabilisation: a muscle-sparing approach to the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  R D Fraser; D J Hall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A modification of the standard midline posterior approach to the intertransverse area of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Christopher Roy Weatherley; Ihab Mohammad Emran; Richard Leonard Martyn Newell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  A novel technique for treatment of progressive scoliosis in young children using a 3-hook and 2-screw construct (H3S2) on a single sub-muscular growing rod: surgical technique.

Authors:  Lotfi Miladi; Maryline Mousny
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Direct Tubular Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Far Lateral Disc Herniation: A Modified Approach.

Authors:  Timothy L T Siu; Kainu Lin
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.