Literature DB >> 16799751

Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.

Eric Olivier1, Julien Beldame, Mourad Ould Slimane, Thomas Defives, Fabrice Duparc.   

Abstract

Wiltse has described in 1968 an intermuscular lumbar approach with two vertical incisions made at 30 mm each on both sides of the midline. Since 1988, Wiltse recommends to practice a single median incision because of aesthetic arguments and because it avoids potential difficulties in case of iterative surgery. In this paper, the goal of authors was to determine the advantages of two lateral incisions, particularly in term of cutaneous vascularization. This cadaveric study concerned ten specimens. Colored latex was injected into the lumbar segmentary arteries before taking a cutaneous flap. We calculated the mean of the number of vessels injected and cut on the midline, then all the 10 mm on both sides. The goal was to establish a cutaneous cartography, and to determine a zone of less vascular sacrifice. The lumbar skin was vascularized by an arteriolar network which spreads out from the midline. At 30 mm from the midline, the number of cut vessels is statistically less than in the others areas (P < 0.05). At this distance, the small arteries are superficial, fine, and the subcutaneous tissue appears poorly vascularized. The two lateral incisions have the advantage compared to a single median incision of being short, and of allowing a direct access to the muscular plan of cleavage without subcutaneous detachment, with a less pressure retraction. We think that an incision at 30 mm from spinous processes is less noxious for the skin because it is located at the border of two vascular territories, which depend of a median network for one, and a lateral network for the other. These incisions generate technical difficulties, however, when the approach is prolonged with the top of L2/L3, when a lateral and/or central canalar decompression is considered, and finally, in the event of iterative surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16799751     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-006-0123-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  3 in total

1.  The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports.

Authors:  H Kato; M Hasegawa; T Takada; S Torii
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1999-10

2.  New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; C W Spencer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; J G Bateman; R H Hutchinson; W E Nelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.284

  3 in total
  14 in total

1.  Pre-operative planning when using the Wiltse approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Andrew Warren; Vishal Prasad; Mark Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the cross-sectional area of the muscle contractile and non-contractile components.

Authors:  Olivier Gille; Mathieu-Panchoa de Sèze; Patrick Guérin; Erwan Jolivet; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Minimally invasive double approach (anterior and posterior) to the lumbar spine in revision surgery.

Authors:  Roberto Bassani; Aldo Sinigaglia; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical study of the multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Haijun Li; Lei Yang; Jinhua Chen; Hao Xie; Weizhong Tian; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Two different surgery approaches for treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.

Authors:  Zhonghao Liu; Zhiqiang Li; Deguo Xing; Hongwei Gao; Chuanliang Peng; Mingzhi Gong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

6.  Surgical outcomes of mini-open Wiltse approach and conventional open approach in patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury.

Authors:  Haijun Li; Lei Yang; Hao Xie; Lipeng Yu; Haifeng Wei; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2015-01-16

7.  Minimally invasive one-level lumbar decompression and fusion surgery with posterior instrumentation using a combination of pedicle screw fixation and transpedicular facet screw construct.

Authors:  John Hsiang; Keyi Yu; Yongxiong He
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-09-26

8.  Early clinical effects of the Dynesys system plus transfacet decompression through the Wiltse approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Lei Wang; Ji-Wei Tian
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-24

9.  Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fractures.

Authors:  Xi-Yan Xu; Zheng-Jian Yan; Qing Ma; Liang Chen; Zhen-Yong Ke; Fu Chen; Yun Chen; Lei Chu; Zhong-Liang Deng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.

Authors:  Xuefei Deng; Youzhi Zhu; Shidong Wang; Yu Zhang; Hui Han; Dengquan Zheng; Zihai Ding; Kelvin K L Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.