Literature DB >> 31749382

Resource Utilization in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer From Hospice Decision to Discharge and Provider-Type Differences.

Ruchi J Shah1, Deborah Korenstein2,3, Jessica R Flynn4, Douglas J Koo2,3.   

Abstract

Aggressive resource utilization for patients with cancer at the end of life has been associated with poor outcomes for patients and their families. To our knowledge, no previous studies have characterized resource utilization as a proxy for quality end-of-life care in hospitalized patients awaiting discharge to hospice by physician and advanced practice providers (APPs). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine resource utilization and the quality metrics for end-of-life care in patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from the date of hospice decision to discharge. Patients under the care of APP teams were less likely to receive laboratory testing (50% vs 59%, P = .046) and received fewer tests than those with house staff teams, though performance on end-of-life quality metrics was similar. Our findings suggest APPs may improve quality of end-of-life care by avoiding unnecessary or aggressive measures compared to house staff.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced cancer; advanced practice providers; hospice; inpatient palliative care; quality of care at end of life; resource utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31749382      PMCID: PMC8170791          DOI: 10.1177/1049909119889289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Authors:  Francis X Campion; Leanne R Larson; Pamela J Kadlubek; Craig C Earle; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  D Spiegel; J R Bloom; H C Kraemer; E Gottheil
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Quality measures for palliative care in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Margaret Gradison; Jennifer M Maguire; Donald Taylor; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents' communication with patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Stewart C Alexander; Sheri A Keitz; Richard Sloane; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Laura D Kubzansky; Eva S Schernhammer; Michelle D Holmes; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A comparison of diagnostic imaging ordering patterns between advanced practice clinicians and primary care physicians following office-based evaluation and management visits.

Authors:  Danny R Hughes; Miao Jiang; Richard Duszak
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; Lois Downey; Sarah E Shannon; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Erin K Kross; Lynn F Reinke; Laura C Feemster; Barbara Edlund; Richard W Arnold; Kim O'Connor; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparing hospice and nonhospice patient survival among patients who die within a three-year window.

Authors:  Stephen R Connor; Bruce Pyenson; Kathryn Fitch; Carol Spence; Kosuke Iwasaki
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.612

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.