Literature DB >> 16505430

Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Candyce H Kroenke1, Laura D Kubzansky, Eva S Schernhammer, Michelle D Holmes, Ichiro Kawachi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively examined social ties and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants included 2,835 women from the Nurses' Health Study who were diagnosed with stages 1 to 4 breast cancer between 1992 and 2002. Of these women, 224 deaths (107 of these related to breast cancer) accrued to the year 2004. Social networks were assessed in 1992, 1996, and 2000 with the Berkman-Syme Social Networks Index. Social support was assessed in 1992 and 2000 as the presence and availability of a confidant. Cox proportional hazards models were used in prospective analyses of social networks and support, both before and following diagnosis, and subsequent survival.
RESULTS: In multivariate-adjusted analyses, women who were socially isolated before diagnosis had a subsequent 66% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.65) and a two-fold increased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.12) compared with women who were socially integrated. Women without close relatives (HR = 2.65; 95% CI, 1.03 to 6.82), friends (HR = 4.06; 95% CI, 1.40 to 11.75), or living children (HR = 5.62; 95% CI, 1.20 to 26.46) had elevated risks of breast cancer mortality and of all-cause mortality compared with those with the most social ties. Neither participation in religious or community activities nor having a confidant was related to outcomes. Effect estimates were similar in analyses of postdiagnosis networks.
CONCLUSION: Socially isolated women had an elevated risk of mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer, likely because of a lack of access to care, specifically beneficial caregiving from friends, relatives, and adult children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16505430     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  220 in total

1.  Benefits of marriage on relative and conditional relative cancer survival differ between males and females in the USA.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill; Erin Johnson
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Biobehavioral factors and cancer progression: physiological pathways and mechanisms.

Authors:  Susan K Lutgendorf; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Senior adult oncology.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Cancer survivors' responses to daily stressors: implications for quality of life.

Authors:  Erin S Costanzo; Robert S Stawski; Carol D Ryff; Christopher L Coe; David M Almeida
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Antecedents and mediators of community connection in African American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Sue P Heiney; Linda J Hazlett; Sally P Weinrich; Linda M Wells; Swann Arp Adams; Sandra Millon Underwood; Rudolph S Parrish
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Testing the effects of social anxiety disorder on friendship quality across gender and ethnicity.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Katya C Fernandez; Cheri A Levinson
Journal:  Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2012-03-19

7.  Factors influencing chemotherapy knowledge in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Pearman D Parker; Sue P Heiney; Swann Arp Adams; Daniela B Friedman; Robin M Dawson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.257

8.  Social enrichment attenuates chemotherapy induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and affective behavior via oxytocin signaling.

Authors:  William H Walker; O Hecmarie Meléndez-Fernández; Jordan L Pascoe; Ning Zhang; A Courtney DeVries
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.217

9.  Neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive function in non-CNS cancer and its treatment: current status and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Andrew J Saykin; Michiel B de Ruiter; Brenna C McDonald; Sabine Deprez; Daniel H S Silverman
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Links between inflammation, amygdala reactivity, and social support in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Keely A Muscatell; Naomi I Eisenberger; Janine M Dutcher; Steven W Cole; Julienne E Bower
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 7.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.