Literature DB >> 31742221

Comparison between Patellar Resurfacing and Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty Regarding the Postoperative Satisfaction of Patients and Patellar Crepitus.

Mohammad H Kaseb1,2,3, Javad Mortazavi1,2,3, Mohammad Ayati Firoozabadi1,2,3, Hesam Toofan1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not uncommon. The choice between patellar resurfacing or retention in TKA has remained controversial. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of patellar resurfacing on the incidence of patellar crepitus. In addition, we compared the clinical outcomes and satisfaction between the patients who underwent patellar retention or resurfacing.
METHODS: A total of 63 patients randomly received patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing TKA by one surgeon at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran during May 2014-February 2017. Finally, 29 patients in the resurfaced group and 44 subjects with retained patella were evaluated pre-op and in an average follow-up period of 8.68 months using the clinical Knee Society Score (KSS), functional KSS, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).
RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups regarding the satisfaction of patients, KSS, and KOOS. It was shown that the latter scores improved in both groups in the follow-up period. Nonetheless, patellar crepitus was not statistically different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: According to the results of the present study, patellar resurfacing did not lead to decreased patellar crepitus or enhanced clinical outcomes of TKA. © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee crepitus; Patellar resurfacing; Patient satisfaction; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742221      PMCID: PMC6802549     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  35 in total

1.  Patellofemoral complications with the Insall-Burstein II posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C M Larson; P F Lachiewicz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Total knee arthroplasty in a group of patients less than 45 years of age.

Authors:  D F Dalury; F C Ewald; M J Christie; R D Scott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shuzhen Li; Yueping Chen; Wei Su; Jinmin Zhao; Shunqing He; Xiangping Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The consequences of not resurfacing the patella.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; R Stephen J Burnett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence.

Authors:  Vittorio Calvisi; Gianluca Camillieri; Stefano Lupparelli
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Femoral Implant Design Modification Decreases the Incidence of Patellar Crepitus in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Ryan Martin; Jason M Jennings; Tyler S Watters; Daniel L Levy; David Clinton McNabb; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years' followup.

Authors:  R Stephen Burnett; Christopher M Haydon; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Patellar crepitation in the P.F.C. sigma total knee system.

Authors:  Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat; John E Slamin; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement.

Authors:  H U Cameron; Y B Jung
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1988-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence.

Authors:  Michal Grela; Matthew Barrett; Setor K Kunutsor; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse; Gulraj S Matharu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 2.  Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiaoyu Dai; Lidong Li; Zhigang Chen; Haidong Cui; Shujun Lv
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  To Resurface or Not to Resurface the Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty, That Is the Question: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Alberto Delgado-González; Juan José Morales-Viaji; Jose Gregorio Arteaga-Hernández; Ángela Larrosa-Arranz; Guillerno Criado-Albillos; Adoración Del Pilar Martin-Rodríguez; Maha Jahouh; Josefa González-Santos; Leticia Mendieta Díaz; Carla Collazo Riobo; Sara Calvo Simal; Jerónimo Javier González-Bernal
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.