Literature DB >> 28012722

Femoral Implant Design Modification Decreases the Incidence of Patellar Crepitus in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

J Ryan Martin1, Jason M Jennings1, Tyler S Watters1, Daniel L Levy1, David Clinton McNabb2, Douglas A Dennis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellar crepitus is a complication most commonly seen in patients implanted with a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recently, design changes in the patellofemoral geometry and the intercondylar box ratio have been optimized in newer TKA designs. A comparative study was performed to analyze the incidence of patellar crepitus between a historical vs modern TKA design.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients at our institution that underwent a primary TKA with either a PFC Sigma or Attune posterior-stabilized TKA (DePuy, Inc, Warsaw, IN), with a minimum of 1-year follow-up duration was performed. A total of 1165 participants implanted with the PFC Sigma and 728 with the Attune design were analyzed. Patellar crepitus incidence, functional scores, and range of motion were recorded at each follow-up appointment. Statistical analyses were performed between the 2 groups to determine if there were differences in clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The incidence of crepitus in participants implanted with the Attune was 0.55% vs 6.26% in the PFC Sigma cohort (P < .001) at 1 year vs. 0.83% vs 9.4%, respectively at 2 years post operatively (P < .001). There were small differences in extension, flexion, and Knee Society Scores between the 2 groups that were not clinically meaningful.
CONCLUSION: The Attune posterior-stabilized TKA demonstrated substantially less patellofemoral crepitus incidence than the historical control. We hypothesize that these findings are related to femoral component changes including a thinner and narrower anterior flange and a reduced femoral intercondylar box ratio.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crepitus; femoral component design; patellar clunk; posterior-stabilized; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28012722     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Short term patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: Does the implant matter?

Authors:  Ilda B Molloy; Benjamin J Keeney; Michael B Sparks; Nicholas G Paddock; Karl M Koenig; Wayne E Moschetti; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparison between Patellar Resurfacing and Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty Regarding the Postoperative Satisfaction of Patients and Patellar Crepitus.

Authors:  Mohammad H Kaseb; Javad Mortazavi; Mohammad Ayati Firoozabadi; Hesam Toofan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-09

3.  Clinico-Radiological and Functional Results of the Navigated Gradius (Gradually Reducing Radius) Knee Prosthesis at Short to Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Mrinal Sharma; Bharat Dhanjani; Jibran Bashir; Anshu Kumar Anshu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Does Knee Prosthesis Survivorship Improve When Implant Designs Change? Findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves; Richard N de Steiger; David G Campbell; Yi Peng; Alesha Hatton; Michelle Lorimer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  Noise around the Knee.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Cheol Hee Park; Hu Liang; Sang Jun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-02-27

6.  Fracture of the insert cone of a polyethylene liner in a failed posterior-stabilized, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marc R Angerame; Jason M Jennings; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-11-07

7.  Comparison of Patellofemoral-Specific Clinical and Radiographic Results after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Patellofemoral Design-Modified Prosthesis and Its Predecessor.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Uk Suh; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  No reduced patellar loading with latest-generation cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty-a comparative study of Attune and Press-Fit Condylar®.

Authors:  Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Puja Ahmadi; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system.

Authors:  Rachid Rassir; Inger N Sierevelt; Marjolein Schager; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Influence of femoral implant design modification on anterior knee pain and patellar crepitus in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Huang; Yu-Hang Gao; Lu Ding; Bo Liu; Jian-Guo Liu; Xin Qi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.