Mollie Rose Canzona1,2,3, Carla L Fisher4, Kevin B Wright5, Christy J W Ledford6. 1. Department of Communication, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. canzonmr@wfu.edu. 2. Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. canzonmr@wfu.edu. 3. Comprehensive Cancer Center of WFU, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. canzonmr@wfu.edu. 4. Department of Advertising, UF Health Cancer Center, UF Health Center for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. 6. Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer survivor (BCS)-provider communication about sexual health (SH) is often absent or inadequate. Patients report wanting providers to broach the topic, but providers cite barriers to initiating discussions. While the health care community works to address barriers, it is unrealistic to rely solely on provider initiation of SH conversations. This research investigates willingness to communicate about sexual health (WTCSH) to better understand what may interfere with survivors' ability to self-advocate and receive care for these concerns. METHODS: (N = 305) BCSs completed online surveys. Hierarchical multiple regression determined the relationship between Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F), which measures psychological and social dimensions of SH and WTCSH. Interviews were then conducted with forty BCSs. The constant comparative method was used to thematically analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: The mean SQOL score was 53.4 out of 100. No statistically significant differences in SQOL or WTCSH were found by age or survivorship length. The positive relationship between WTCSH and SQOL was significant, F (6,266) = 4.92, p < .000, adj. R2 = .080). Five themes illustrated factors that shape WTCSH: (1) comfort discussing SH; (2) perception of demographic similarity/discordance; (3) patient-centered communication; (4) belief that SH is (un)treatable, and (5) ability to access timely/coordinated care. CONCLUSIONS: Findings establish the significance of SH concerns and provide an in-depth understanding of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational issues informing WTCSH. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Age and gender dynamics, perceptions of provider SQOL messaging, and futility influence survivor openness. Addressing these areas may encourage disclosure among women who would otherwise continue to suffer in silence.
PURPOSE:Breast cancer survivor (BCS)-provider communication about sexual health (SH) is often absent or inadequate. Patients report wanting providers to broach the topic, but providers cite barriers to initiating discussions. While the health care community works to address barriers, it is unrealistic to rely solely on provider initiation of SH conversations. This research investigates willingness to communicate about sexual health (WTCSH) to better understand what may interfere with survivors' ability to self-advocate and receive care for these concerns. METHODS: (N = 305) BCSs completed online surveys. Hierarchical multiple regression determined the relationship between Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F), which measures psychological and social dimensions of SH and WTCSH. Interviews were then conducted with forty BCSs. The constant comparative method was used to thematically analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: The mean SQOL score was 53.4 out of 100. No statistically significant differences in SQOL or WTCSH were found by age or survivorship length. The positive relationship between WTCSH and SQOL was significant, F (6,266) = 4.92, p < .000, adj. R2 = .080). Five themes illustrated factors that shape WTCSH: (1) comfort discussing SH; (2) perception of demographic similarity/discordance; (3) patient-centered communication; (4) belief that SH is (un)treatable, and (5) ability to access timely/coordinated care. CONCLUSIONS: Findings establish the significance of SH concerns and provide an in-depth understanding of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational issues informing WTCSH. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Age and gender dynamics, perceptions of provider SQOL messaging, and futility influence survivor openness. Addressing these areas may encourage disclosure among women who would otherwise continue to suffer in silence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Oncology; Patient-provider communication; Sexual health; Survivorship
Authors: Lari Wenzel; Aysun Dogan-Ates; Rana Habbal; Ross Berkowitz; Donald P Goldstein; Marilyn Bernstein; Brenda Coffey Kluhsman; Kathryn Osann; Edward Newlands; Michael J Seckl; Barry Hancock; David Cella Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2005
Authors: Stacy Tessler Lindau; L Philip Schumm; Edward O Laumann; Wendy Levinson; Colm A O'Muircheartaigh; Linda J Waite Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melinda Kantsiper; Erin L McDonald; Gail Geller; Lillie Shockney; Claire Snyder; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Mollie Rose Canzona; David Garcia; Carla L Fisher; Meghan Raleigh; Virginia Kalish; Christy J W Ledford Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-06-17