| Literature DB >> 35544293 |
Lijuan Chen1, Danyang Zhang2, Mutian Hou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the rise of online health care service, there is growing discussion on the relationship between physicians and patients online, yet few researchers have paid attention to patients' perception of social presence, especially its influence on their willingness to communicate (WTC).Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; mobile medical consultation; mobile medical service; perceived social presence; willingness to communicate about health
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35544293 PMCID: PMC9133978 DOI: 10.2196/31797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 7.076
Figure 1Research model.
Participant demographics.
| Characteristics | Value, n (%) | ||
|
| |||
|
| Female | 84 (40.8) | |
|
| Male | 122 (59.2) | |
|
| |||
|
| <18 | 11 (5.3) | |
|
| 18-24 | 79 (38.4) | |
|
| 25-34 | 69 (33.5) | |
|
| 35-44 | 35 (17.0) | |
|
| >44 | 12 (5.8) | |
|
| |||
|
| Primary school | 1 (0.5) | |
|
| Junior high school | 25 (12.1) | |
|
| High school | 38 (18.5) | |
|
| Junior college | 58 (28.2) | |
|
| Bachelor | 75 (36.4) | |
|
| Master | 9 (4.4) | |
|
| Doctor | 0 (0) | |
|
| |||
|
| <1000 (154) | 15 (7.3) | |
|
| 1000-2000 (154-308) | 7 (3.4) | |
|
| 2000-5000 (308-772) | 61 (29.6) | |
|
| 5000-10,000 (772-1544) | 102 (49.5) | |
|
| 10,000-100,000 (1544-15,440) | 20 (9.7) | |
|
| >100,000 (>15,440) | 1 (0.5) | |
aRMB: renminbi.
Figure 2Interface for group 1 with a low level of social presence.
Figure 3Interface for group 2 with a high level of social presence.
Results of confirmatory factor analysis.
| Factor and item | Stda loading | Convergent validity | |||||
|
|
| CRb | AVEc | ||||
|
| —e | 0.87 | 0.57 | ||||
|
| PSP1 | 0.74 | — | — | |||
|
| PSP2 | 0.72 | — | — | |||
|
| PSP3 | 0.76 | — | — | |||
|
| PSP4 | 0.82 | — | — | |||
|
| PSP5 | 0.74 | — | — | |||
|
| — | 0.81 | 0.52 | ||||
|
| CA1 | 0.79 | — | — | |||
|
| CA2 | 0.84 | — | — | |||
|
| CA3 | 0.58 | — | — | |||
|
| CA4 | 0.63 | — | — | |||
|
| — | 0.89 | 0.68 | ||||
|
| SPCC1 | 0.86 | — | — | |||
|
| SPCC2 | 0.94 | — | — | |||
|
| SPCC3 | 0.70 | — | — | |||
|
| SPCC4 | 0.77 | — | — | |||
|
| — | 0.76 | 0.62 | ||||
|
| SPCC5 | 0.81 | — | — | |||
|
| SPCC6 | 0.76 | — | — | |||
|
| — | 0.84 | 0.52 | ||||
|
| WTCH1 | 0.69 | — | — | |||
|
| WTCH2 | 0.69 | — | — | |||
|
| WTCH3 | 0.80 | — | — | |||
|
| WTCH4 | 0.66 | — | — | |||
|
| WTCH5 | 0.74 | — | — | |||
|
| — | 0.80 | 0.51 | ||||
|
| WTC1 | 0.81 | — | — | |||
|
| WTC2 | 0.58 | — | — | |||
|
| WTC3 | 0.54 | — | — | |||
|
| WTC4 | 0.87 | — | — | |||
aStd: standardized.
bCR: construct reliability.
cAVE: average variance extracted.
dPSP: perceived social presence.
eNot applicable.
fCA: communication apprehension.
gSPCC: self-perceived communication competence dimension 1.
hSPCC (5-6): self-perceived communication competence dimension 2.
iWTCH: willingness to communicate about health.
jWTC: willingness to communicate.
Results of independent samples t test.
| Group | Social presence level | Mean (SD) | |||
| 1 | Low | 3.85 (0.77) | 0.01 | –2.12 | .04 |
| 2 | High | 4.07 (0.75) | —a | — | — |
aNot applicable.
Partial correlation analysis controlling age, gender, education level, income level, and willingness to communicate.
|
| PSPa | CAb | SPCCc | WTCHd |
| PSP | —e | — | — | — |
| CA | –.23 | — | — | — |
| SPCC | 0.37 | –.40 | — | — |
| WTCH | 0.64 | –.35 | 0.6 | — |
aPSP: perceived social presence.
bCA: communication apprehension.
cSPCC: self-perceived communication competence.
dWTCH: willingness to communicate about health.
eNot applicable.
Summary of the coefficients and the models controlling age, gender, education level, income level, and willingness to communicate.
|
| CA (M1)a | SPCC (M2)b | WTCH (Y)c | ||||||||
|
| Coeff. |
| Coeff. |
| Coeff. |
| |||||
| PSP (X)d | –.26 | –3.38 | <.001 | 0.21 | 4.54 | <.001 | 0.41 | 9.3 | <.001 | ||
| CA (M1) | — | — | — | –.24 | –5.14 | <.001 | –.08 | –1.75 | .082 | ||
| SPCC (M2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.47 | 7.2 | <.001 | ||
aCA (M1): communication apprehension as mediator 1.
bSPCC (M2): self-perceived communication competence as mediator 2.
cWTCH (Y): willingness to communicate about health as Y.
dPSP (X): perceived social presence as X.
Model summary of communication apprehension, self-perceived communication competence, and willingness to communicate about health as outcome variables.
|
| CA (M1)a | SPCC (M2)b | WTCH (Y)c |
|
| 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.57 |
| 3.92 | 11.48 | 33.05 | |
| .001 | <.001 | <.001 |
aCA (M1): communication apprehension as mediator 1.
bSPCC (M2): self-perceived communication competence as mediator 2.
cWTCH (Y): willingness to communicate about health as Y.
Summary of the mediation pathways.
| Mediation pathways | Effect | BootLLCIa | BootULCIb |
| Total | 0.14 | 0.087 | 0.208 |
| PSP→CA→WTCH | 0.02 | –0.001 | 0.048 |
| PSP→SPCC→WTCH | 0.10 | 0.054 | 0.150 |
| PSP→CA→SPCC→WTCH | 0.03 | 0.009 | 0.052 |
aBootLLCI: bootstrap lower limit confidence interval.
bBootULCI: bootstrap upper limit confidence interval.
Figure 4Final mediation model. ***P<.001.