Benjamin Stern1, Thomas McGarrity2, Maria Baker3. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 200 Campus Dr, Suite 2400|Entrance 4, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. bstern@pennstatehealth.psu.edu. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 200 Campus Dr, Suite 2400|Entrance 4, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. 3. Division of Hematology Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State Cancer Institute, 400 University Dr, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Decades have passed since the underlying molecular etiologies of the most common hereditary forms of colorectal cancer (CRC), Lynch syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were first described. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, the landscape of hereditary CRC testing has changed dramatically. We review available screening strategies, novel CRC predisposition genes, and challenges and opportunities in this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Improved sensitivity and availability of NGS panel testing have greatly expanded our understanding regarding the number of CRC syndromes and their phenotypic expression. A variety of screening strategies are available to identify heritable CRC syndromes, potentially decreasing morbidity and mortality in this population. However, these screening strategies remain imperfect and present challenges regarding their implementation in clinical practice. Screening strategies include universal screening of CRC tumors for Lynch syndrome, clinical prediction algorithms, and risk assessment questionnaires. Additionally, there remains a gap in our understanding of the clinical implications of novel gene mutations of variable penetrance and unexpected NGS panel test results. Incorporation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may help to further refine cancer risk assessment, and the clinical introduction of RNA analysis may allow us to clarify variants of unknown significance (VUSs) and identify deep intronic mutations that would otherwise be missed. Recognition of genetic predisposition to CRC is critical for the practicing gastroenterologist. The evolving field of cancer genetics offers great challenges and opportunities for improved CRC management.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Decades have passed since the underlying molecular etiologies of the most common hereditary forms of colorectal cancer (CRC), Lynch syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were first described. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, the landscape of hereditary CRC testing has changed dramatically. We review available screening strategies, novel CRC predisposition genes, and challenges and opportunities in this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Improved sensitivity and availability of NGS panel testing have greatly expanded our understanding regarding the number of CRC syndromes and their phenotypic expression. A variety of screening strategies are available to identify heritable CRC syndromes, potentially decreasing morbidity and mortality in this population. However, these screening strategies remain imperfect and present challenges regarding their implementation in clinical practice. Screening strategies include universal screening of CRC tumors for Lynch syndrome, clinical prediction algorithms, and risk assessment questionnaires. Additionally, there remains a gap in our understanding of the clinical implications of novel gene mutations of variable penetrance and unexpected NGS panel test results. Incorporation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may help to further refine cancer risk assessment, and the clinical introduction of RNA analysis may allow us to clarify variants of unknown significance (VUSs) and identify deep intronic mutations that would otherwise be missed. Recognition of genetic predisposition to CRC is critical for the practicing gastroenterologist. The evolving field of cancer genetics offers great challenges and opportunities for improved CRC management.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer genetic testing; Cancer risk assessment; Genetic counseling; Hereditary colorectal cancer; Next-generation sequencing panel; Polyposis
Authors: Isabel Quintana; Raquel Mejías-Luque; Mariona Terradas; Matilde Navarro; Virginia Piñol; Pilar Mur; Sami Belhadj; Elia Grau; Esther Darder; Ares Solanes; Joan Brunet; Gabriel Capellá; Markus Gerhard; Laura Valle Journal: Gut Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Heather Hampel; Rachel Pearlman; Mallory Beightol; Weiqiang Zhao; Daniel Jones; Wendy L Frankel; Paul J Goodfellow; Ahmet Yilmaz; Kristin Miller; Jason Bacher; Angela Jacobson; Electra Paskett; Peter G Shields; Richard M Goldberg; Albert de la Chapelle; Brian H Shirts; Colin C Pritchard Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Matthew B Yurgelun; Brian Allen; Rajesh R Kaldate; Karla R Bowles; Thaddeus Judkins; Praveen Kaushik; Benjamin B Roa; Richard J Wenstrup; Anne-Renee Hartman; Sapna Syngal Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Elena Stoffel; Bhramar Mukherjee; Victoria M Raymond; Nabihah Tayob; Fay Kastrinos; Jennifer Sparr; Fei Wang; Prathap Bandipalliam; Sapna Syngal; Stephen B Gruber Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-07-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ravi N Sharaf; Parvathi Myer; Christopher D Stave; Lisa C Diamond; Uri Ladabaum Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 11.382