Importance: Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended and involves up to 6 sequential tests. Somatic gene testing is performed on stage IV CRCs for treatment determination. The diagnostic workup for patients with CRC could be simplified and improved using a single up-front tumor next-generation sequencing test if it has higher sensitivity and specificity than the current screening protocol. Objective: To determine whether up-front tumor sequencing (TS) could replace the current multiple sequential test approach for universal tumor screening for LS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Tumor DNA from 419 consecutive CRC cases undergoing standard universal tumor screening and germline genetic testing when indicated as part of the multicenter, population-based Ohio Colorectal Cancer Prevention Initiative from October 2015 through February 2016 (the prospective cohort) and 46 patients with CRC known to have LS due to a germline mutation in a mismatch repair gene from January 2013 through September 2015 (the validation cohort) underwent blinded TS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity of TS compared with microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for the detection of LS. Results: In the 465 patients, mean age at diagnosis was 59.9 years (range, 20-96 years), and 241 (51.8%) were female. Tumor sequencing identified all 46 known LS cases from the validation cohort and an additional 12 LS cases from the 419-member prospective cohort. Testing with MSI or IHC, followed by BRAF p.V600E testing missed 5 and 6 cases of LS, respectively. Tumor sequencing alone had better sensitivity (100%; 95% CI, 93.8%-100%) than IHC plus BRAF (89.7%; 95% CI, 78.8%-96.1%; P = .04) and MSI plus BRAF (91.4%; 95% CI, 81.0%-97.1%; P = .07). Tumor sequencing had equal specificity (95.3%; 95% CI, 92.6%-97.2%) to IHC plus BRAF (94.6%; 95% CI, 91.9%-96.6%; P > .99) and MSI plus BRAF (94.8%; 95% CI, 92.2%-96.8%; P = .88). Tumor sequencing identified 284 cases with KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations that could affect therapy for stage IV CRC, avoiding another test. Finally, TS identified 8 patients with germline DPYD mutations that confer toxicity to fluorouracil chemotherapy, which could also be useful for treatment selection. Conclusions and Relevance: Up-front TS in CRC is simpler and has superior sensitivity to current multitest approaches to LS screening, while simultaneously providing critical information for treatment selection.
Importance: Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended and involves up to 6 sequential tests. Somatic gene testing is performed on stage IV CRCs for treatment determination. The diagnostic workup for patients with CRC could be simplified and improved using a single up-front tumor next-generation sequencing test if it has higher sensitivity and specificity than the current screening protocol. Objective: To determine whether up-front tumor sequencing (TS) could replace the current multiple sequential test approach for universal tumor screening for LS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Tumor DNA from 419 consecutive CRC cases undergoing standard universal tumor screening and germline genetic testing when indicated as part of the multicenter, population-based Ohio Colorectal Cancer Prevention Initiative from October 2015 through February 2016 (the prospective cohort) and 46 patients with CRC known to have LS due to a germline mutation in a mismatch repair gene from January 2013 through September 2015 (the validation cohort) underwent blinded TS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity of TS compared with microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for the detection of LS. Results: In the 465 patients, mean age at diagnosis was 59.9 years (range, 20-96 years), and 241 (51.8%) were female. Tumor sequencing identified all 46 known LS cases from the validation cohort and an additional 12 LS cases from the 419-member prospective cohort. Testing with MSI or IHC, followed by BRAFp.V600E testing missed 5 and 6 cases of LS, respectively. Tumor sequencing alone had better sensitivity (100%; 95% CI, 93.8%-100%) than IHC plus BRAF (89.7%; 95% CI, 78.8%-96.1%; P = .04) and MSI plus BRAF (91.4%; 95% CI, 81.0%-97.1%; P = .07). Tumor sequencing had equal specificity (95.3%; 95% CI, 92.6%-97.2%) to IHC plus BRAF (94.6%; 95% CI, 91.9%-96.6%; P > .99) and MSI plus BRAF (94.8%; 95% CI, 92.2%-96.8%; P = .88). Tumor sequencing identified 284 cases with KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations that could affect therapy for stage IV CRC, avoiding another test. Finally, TS identified 8 patients with germline DPYD mutations that confer toxicity to fluorouracil chemotherapy, which could also be useful for treatment selection. Conclusions and Relevance: Up-front TS in CRC is simpler and has superior sensitivity to current multitest approaches to LS screening, while simultaneously providing critical information for treatment selection.
Authors: Sapna Syngal; Randall E Brand; James M Church; Francis M Giardiello; Heather L Hampel; Randall W Burt Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Stacey A Cohen; Emily H Turner; Mallory B Beightol; Angela Jacobson; Ted A Gooley; Stephen J Salipante; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Christina Smith; Sheena Scroggins; Jonathan F Tait; William M Grady; Edward H Lin; David E Cohn; Paul J Goodfellow; Mark W Arnold; Albert de la Chapelle; Rachel Pearlman; Heather Hampel; Colin C Pritchard Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Kathleen M Schmeler; Henry T Lynch; Lee-may Chen; Mark F Munsell; Pamela T Soliman; Mary Beth Clark; Molly S Daniels; Kristin G White; Stephanie G Boyd-Rogers; Peggy G Conrad; Kathleen Y Yang; Mary M Rubin; Charlotte C Sun; Brian M Slomovitz; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonathan A Nowak; Matthew B Yurgelun; Jacqueline L Bruce; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Dimity L Hall; Priyanka Shivdasani; Elizabeth P Garcia; Agoston T Agoston; Amitabh Srivastava; Shuji Ogino; Frank C Kuo; Neal I Lindeman; Fei Dong Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Renée C Niessen; Robert M W Hofstra; Helga Westers; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Krista Kooi; Paul O J Jager; Marloes L de Groote; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Maran J W Olderode-Berends; Harry Hollema; Jan H Kleibeuker; Rolf H Sijmons Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Heather Hampel; Jerneja Tomsic; Wendy L Frankel; Rachel Pearlman; Albert de la Chapelle; Colin C Pritchard Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Francis M Giardiello; John I Allen; Jennifer E Axilbund; C Richard Boland; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; James M Church; Jason A Dominitz; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David A Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Rachel Pearlman; Wendy L Frankel; Benjamin Swanson; Weiqiang Zhao; Ahmet Yilmaz; Kristin Miller; Jason Bacher; Christopher Bigley; Lori Nelsen; Paul J Goodfellow; Richard M Goldberg; Electra Paskett; Peter G Shields; Jo L Freudenheim; Peter P Stanich; Ilene Lattimer; Mark Arnold; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Matthew Kalady; Brandie Heald; Carla Greenwood; Ian Paquette; Marla Prues; David J Draper; Carolyn Lindeman; J Philip Kuebler; Kelly Reynolds; Joanna M Brell; Amy A Shaper; Sameer Mahesh; Nicole Buie; Kisa Weeman; Kristin Shine; Mitchell Haut; Joan Edwards; Shyamal Bastola; Karen Wickham; Karamjit S Khanduja; Rosemary Zacks; Colin C Pritchard; Brian H Shirts; Angela Jacobson; Brian Allen; Albert de la Chapelle; Heather Hampel Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Nicky D'Haene; Marie Le Mercier; Nancy De Nève; Oriane Blanchard; Mélanie Delaunoy; Hakim El Housni; Barbara Dessars; Pierre Heimann; Myriam Remmelink; Pieter Demetter; Sabine Tejpar; Isabelle Salmon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C Guillén-Ponce; E Lastra; I Lorenzo-Lorenzo; T Martín Gómez; R Morales Chamorro; A B Sánchez-Heras; R Serrano; M C Soriano Rodríguez; J L Soto; L Robles Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Brian H Shirts; Eric Q Konnick; Sarah Upham; Tom Walsh; John Michael O Ranola; Angela L Jacobson; Mary-Claire King; Rachel Pearlman; Heather Hampel; Colin C Pritchard Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Rachel Pearlman; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Albert de la Chapelle; Jon G Jonasson; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Wendy L Frankel; Thorunn Rafnar; Kari Stefansson; Colin C Pritchard; Heather Hampel Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: François Audenet; Sumit Isharwal; Eugene K Cha; Mark T A Donoghue; Esther N Drill; Irina Ostrovnaya; Eugene J Pietzak; John P Sfakianos; Aditya Bagrodia; Paari Murugan; Guido Dalbagni; Timothy F Donahue; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Dean F Bajorin; Maria E Arcila; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Michael F Berger; Barry S Taylor; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Gopa Iyer; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan A Coleman; David B Solit Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531