Literature DB >> 31734722

Safety and efficacy of superior turbinate biopsies as a source of olfactory epithelium appropriate for morphological analysis.

Ellen Cristine Duarte Garcia1, Ana Carolina Rossaneis2, Alexandre Salvatore Pipino1, Gustavo Vasconcelos Gomes1, Fábio de Rezende Pinna3, Richard Louis Voegels3, Richard L Doty4, Waldiceu Aparecido Verri2, Marco Aurélio Fornazieri5,6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is no standardized approach for preserving olfactory function in the side of the nose where biopsy of the olfactory epithelium (OE) is performed. Moreover, a gold standard technique for obtaining human OE in vivo is still lacking. We determined the efficacy of obtaining good-quality OE specimens suitable for pathological analysis from the lower half of the superior turbinate and verified the safety of this procedure in maintaining bilateral and unilateral olfactory function.
METHODS: In 21 individuals without olfactory complaints and who had undergone septoplasty and inferior turbinectomy OE biopsy was made during septoplasty. Olfactory function, both unilateral and bilateral, was assessed using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) before and 1 month after the procedure. Specimens were marked with the olfactory marker protein for confirmation of OE presence.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of the samples contained OE, although clear histological characterization was possible from only 62%. There was no deterioration of UPSIT scores either bilaterally or unilaterally on the side of the biopsy. Patients also maintained the ability to identify individual odorants.
CONCLUSION: Biopsies of the lower half of the superior turbinate do not affect olfactory function and show strong efficacy in yielding OE tissue and moderate efficacy for yielding tissue appropriate for morphological analysis. Future studies are needed to assess the safety of this procedure in other OE regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunohistochemistry; Morphology; Nasal mucosa; Olfactory function; Smell; Smell tests

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31734722     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05728-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  44 in total

1.  Abnormalities of axon growth in human olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  Eric H Holbrook; Donald A Leopold; James E Schwob
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Visualizing an olfactory sensory map.

Authors:  P Mombaerts; F Wang; C Dulac; S K Chao; A Nemes; M Mendelsohn; J Edmondson; R Axel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Electron microscopy of human olfactory epithelium reveals a new cell type: the microvillar cell.

Authors:  D T Moran; J C Rowley; B W Jafek
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Culture of olfactory ensheathing cells for central nerve repair: the limitations and potential of endoscopic olfactory mucosal biopsy.

Authors:  Carolina Kachramanoglou; Stuart Law; Peter Andrews; Daqing Li; David Choi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Immunohistochemical characterization of human olfactory tissue.

Authors:  Eric H Holbrook; Enming Wu; William T Curry; Derrick T Lin; James E Schwob
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Chronic sinusitis and anosmia: pathologic changes in the olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  R C Kern
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Olfactory mucosal findings in patients with persistent anosmia after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  S H Lee; H H Lim; H M Lee; H J Park; J O Choi
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Examination and classification of human olfactory mucosa in patients with clinical olfactory disturbances.

Authors:  M Yamagishi; S Hasegawa; Y Nakano
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1988

9.  Biopsy of human olfactory mucosa. An instrument and a technique.

Authors:  M A Lovell; B W Jafek; D T Moran; J C Rowley
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1982-04

10.  Olfactory mucosal findings and clinical course in patients with olfactory disorders following upper respiratory viral infection.

Authors:  M Yamagishi; M Fujiwara; H Nakamura
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  4 in total

1.  Endoscopic endonasal transmaxillary-pterygoid approach for skull-base non-vestibular schwannomas in 10 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Yusuke Morinaga; Hiroyoshi Akutsu; Hiroyoshi Kino; Takuma Hara; Shuho Tanaka; Hidetaka Miyamoto; Masahide Matsuda; Eiichi Ishikawa
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  A Histochemical Analysis of Neurofibrillary Tangles in Olfactory Epithelium, a Study Based on an Autopsy Case of Juvenile Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Shino Shimizu; Ichiro Tojima; Keigo Nakamura; Hideaki Kouzaki; Takeshi Kanesaka; Norihiro Ogawa; Yoshio Hashizume; Hiroyasu Akatsu; Akira Hori; Ikuo Tooyama; Takeshi Shimizu
Journal:  Acta Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Potential Mechanisms for COVID-19 Induced Anosmia and Dysgeusia.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Mehdi Mirsaeidi; Camron Davies; Fred F Telischi; Nirupa Chaudhari; Rahul Mittal
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Biopsy of the olfactory epithelium from the superior nasal septum: is it possible to obtain neurons without damaging olfaction?

Authors:  Ellen Cristine Duarte Garcia; Lucas de Almeida Luz; Lucas Kanieski Anzolin; José Lucas Barbosa da Silva; Richard L Doty; Fábio de Rezende Pinna; Richard Louis Voegels; Marco Aurélio Fornazieri
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.