Literature DB >> 31733588

Ligand binding characteristics of the Ku80 von Willebrand domain.

Kyungmin Kim1, Jungki Min1, Thomas W Kirby1, Scott A Gabel1, Lars C Pedersen1, Robert E London2.   

Abstract

The N-terminal von Willebrand domain of Ku80 supports interactions with a Ku binding motif (KBM) that has been identified in at least three other DNA repair proteins: the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) scaffold APLF, the modulator of retrovirus infection, MRI, and the Werner syndrome protein (WRN). A second, more recently identified Ku binding motif present in XLF and several other proteins (KBMX) has also been reported to interact with this domain. The isolated Ku80 von Willebrand antigen domain (vWA) from Xenopus laevis has a sequence that is 60% identical with the human domain, is readily expressed and has been used to investigate these interactions. Structural characterization of the complexes formed with the KBM motifs in human APLF, MRI, and WRN identify a conserved binding site that is consistent with previously-reported mutational studies. In contrast with the KBM binding site, structural studies indicate that the KBMX site is occluded by a distorted helix. Fluorescence polarization and 19F NMR studies of a fluorinated XLF C-terminal peptide failed to indicate any interaction with the frog vWA. It was hypothesized that availability of this binding site is conditional, i.e., dependent on specific experimental conditions or other repair factors to make the site available for binding. Modulating the fraction of KBMX-accessible binding site mutationally demonstrated that the more open site is capable of binding the KBMXXLF motif peptide. It is suggested that the conditional nature of KBMX binding limits formation of non-productive complexes so that activation-dependent site availability can more optimally support advancing the synapsis process. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditional binding site; Fluorine-19 NMR; Ku binding motif; Ku80 von Willebrand factor A domain; X-ray crystallography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31733588      PMCID: PMC7495496          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  41 in total

1.  Non-homologous end-joining partners in a helical dance: structural studies of XLF-XRCC4 interactions.

Authors:  Qian Wu; Takashi Ochi; Dijana Matak-Vinkovic; Carol V Robinson; Dimitri Y Chirgadze; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  Isolation, characterization, and genetic complementation of a cellular mutant resistant to retroviral infection.

Authors:  Sumit Agarwal; Josephine Harada; Jeffrey Schreifels; Patrycja Lech; Bryan Nikolai; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Sumit K Chanda; Nikunj V Somia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The Ku heterodimer: function in DNA repair and beyond.

Authors:  Victoria L Fell; Caroline Schild-Poulter
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.657

4.  Sequence-specific determination of protein and peptide concentrations by absorbance at 205 nm.

Authors:  Nicholas J Anthis; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  A human short open reading frame (sORF)-encoded polypeptide that stimulates DNA end joining.

Authors:  Sarah A Slavoff; Jinho Heo; Bogdan A Budnik; Leslyn A Hanakahi; Alan Saghatelian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system.

Authors:  L Aravind; E V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The neurodegenerative disease protein aprataxin resolves abortive DNA ligation intermediates.

Authors:  Ivan Ahel; Ulrich Rass; Sherif F El-Khamisy; Sachin Katyal; Paula M Clements; Peter J McKinnon; Keith W Caldecott; Stephen C West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  One ring to bring them all--the role of Ku in mammalian non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Gabrielle J Grundy; Hayley A Moulding; Keith W Caldecott; Stuart L Rulten
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-26

9.  C-NHEJ without indels is robust and requires synergistic function of distinct XLF domains.

Authors:  Ragini Bhargava; Manbir Sandhu; Sanychen Muk; Gabriella Lee; Nagarajan Vaidehi; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The essential elements for the noncovalent association of two DNA ends during NHEJ synapsis.

Authors:  Bailin Zhao; Go Watanabe; Michael J Morten; Dylan A Reid; Eli Rothenberg; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  RecQ Helicase Somatic Alterations in Cancer.

Authors:  Megha K Thakkar; Jamie Lee; Stefan Meyer; Vivian Y Chang
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Species variations in XRCC1 recruitment strategies for FHA domain-containing proteins.

Authors:  Robert E London
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-12-24

Review 3.  Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway.

Authors:  Benjamin M Stinson; Joseph J Loparo
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 27.258

4.  Identification of Ku70 Domain-Specific Interactors Using BioID2.

Authors:  Sanna Abbasi; Caroline Schild-Poulter
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  RecQ helicases in DNA repair and cancer targets.

Authors:  Joseph A Newman; Opher Gileadi
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 8.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.