| Literature DB >> 31731767 |
Reihane Ziadlou1,2,3, Andrea Barbero2, Martin J Stoddart1, Michael Wirth1, Zhen Li1, Ivan Martin2,3, Xin-Luan Wang4, Ling Qin4,5, Mauro Alini1, Sibylle Grad1,6.
Abstract
In this study, 34 Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) compounds were screened for potential anabolic and anti-inflammatory properties on human osteoarthritic (OA) chondrocytes. The anabolic effects were assessed by measuring the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) relative to the DNA content using a 3D pellet culture model. The most chondrogenic compounds were tested in an inflammatory model consisting of 3 days of treatment with cytokines (IL-1β/TNF-α) with or without supplementation of TCM compounds. The anti-inflammatory effects were assessed transcriptionally, biochemically and histologically. From the 34 compounds, Vanilic acid (VA), Epimedin A (Epi A) and C (Epi C), 2''-O-rhamnosylicariside II (2-O-rhs II), Icariin, Psoralidin (PS), Protocatechuicaldehyde (PCA), 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA) and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) showed the most profound anabolic effects. After induction of inflammation, pro-inflammatory and catabolic genes were upregulated, and GAG/DNA was decreased. VA, Epi C, PS, PCA, 4-HBA and 5-HMF exhibited anti-catabolic and anti-inflammatory effects and prevented the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory markers including metalloproteinases and cyclooxygenase 2. After two weeks of treatment with TCM compounds, the GAG/DNA ratio was restored compared with the negative control group. Immunohistochemistry and Safranin-O staining confirmed superior amounts of cartilaginous matrix in treated pellets. In conclusion, VA, Epi C, PS, PCA, 4-HBA and 5-HMF showed promising anabolic and anti-inflammatory effects.Entities:
Keywords: anabolic; anti-inflammatory effects; catabolic; osteoarthritic chondrocytes; osteoarthritis; traditional Chinese medicine compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31731767 PMCID: PMC6888688 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Relative viable cell count after treatment with the 34 compounds measured by WST-1 assay.
| Compound | % Cell Numbers (Normalized to Control Vehicle) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc.[µM] | 1 | 10 | 25 | 50 | |
| 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural | 111.4 ± 6.6 | 107.0 ± 11.2 | 110.2 ± 9.4 | 107.9 ± 3.3 | |
| Protocatechuicaldehyde | 100.1 ± 4.2 | 96.0 ± 9.3 | 94.8 ± 6.4 | 81.2 ± 5.4 | |
| Vanilic acid | 102.1 ± 2.4 | 96.8 ± 3.7 | 115.7 ± 3.2 | 112.6 ± 2.1 | |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 103.4 ± 2.5 | 102 ± 9.6 | 105 ± 3.4 | 78.6 ± 6.9 | |
| Chlorogenic acid | 77.8 ± 3.2 | 78.6 ± 4.8 | 77.8 ± 5.2 | 79.8 ± 5.6 | |
| Cryptochlorogenic acid | 86.2 ± 8.5 | 86 ± 7.9 | 93.8 ± 5.2 | 78.3 ± 8.4 | |
| Loganic acid | 85.6 ± 3.6 | 94.7 ± 3 | 91.5 ± 1.7 | 93.6 ± 4.9 | |
| Loganin | 107 ± 5.6 | 109.2 ± 5.1 | 110.6 ± 9.8 | 102.8 ± 3.6 | |
| Isobavachalcone | 102.1 ± 6.6 | 108.7 ± 5.7 | 105.7 ± 0.6 | 88.4 ± 8.8 | |
| Sweroside | 110.2 ± 2.3 | 106.7 ± 4.1 | 112.5 ± 1.8 | 107.7 ± 9.8 | |
| (+)-Cycloolivil | 101.5 ± 1.5 | 98. ± 2.1 | 105.6 ± 4.9 | 103.2 ± 8.2 | |
| Baohuoside I | 82.8 ± 6.3 | 76.3 ± 1.8 | 77.5 ± 0.4 | 79.8 ± 5.8 | |
| 2’-O-rhamnosylicariside II | 102.1 ± 6.6 | 105.5 ± 4.7 | 91.8 ± 3.2 | 102.9 ± 2.1 | |
| Epimedin A | 83.9 ± 5.6 | 84.8 ± 8.1 | 97.1 ± 6.9 | 111.3 ± 5.1 | |
| Epimedin B | 82.7 ± 9.2 | 88 ± 9.9 | 87.8 ± 9.1 | 94. ± 7.9 | |
| Epimedin C | 87.5 ± 0.6 | 89.5 ± 6.5 | 88.1 ± 3.7 | 89.8 ± 6.4 | |
| Isobavachin | 87.3 ± 1.3 | 91.5 ± 8.2 | 89.2 ± 0.8 | 85.7 ± 0.1 | |
| Bavachin | 109.1 ± 2.1 | 102 ± 8.4 | 89.2 ± 9.5 | 91.7 ± 2.1 | |
| Bavachinin | 96.4 ± 1.1 | 78.1 ± 6.6 | 79.9 ± 5.1 | 79.7 ± 3 | |
| Neobavaisoflavone | 84.4 ± 8.6 | 89.6 ± 1.9 | 99 ± 2.5 | 76.1 ± 2.2 | |
| Corylin | 89.6 ± 2.4 | 94 ± 3.7 | 87.8 ± 1.6 | 79.3 ± 3.1 | |
| Epimedin A1 | 95.48 ± 4.3 | 85.49 ± 0.5 | 88.21 ± 3.1 | 95.46 ± 2.4 | |
| Psoralen | 83.6 ± 5.1 | 80.3 ± 5.3 | 85.1 ± 6.4 | 84.8 ± 8.3 | |
| Isopsoralen | 86.2 ± 8.6 | 80.2 ± 1.9 | 83 ± 2.7 | 85.4 ± 3.2 | |
| (S)-Bukuchiol | 89.1 ± 4.4 | 94.4 ± 3.5 | 104.7 ± 4.2 | 88.4 ± 4.2 | |
| Psoralidin | 106.5 ± 6.3 | 84.7 ± 1.4 | 86.4 ± 5.9 | 85.1 ± 4.8 | |
| Asperosaponin VI | 93.9 ± 2.8 | 99 ± 9.2 | 103.8 ± 4.5 | 93.9 ± 4.8 | |
| Baohuoside II | 103.6 ± 5.9 | 96.4 ± 7.6 | 95 ± 5.2 | 79.7 ± 2.9 | |
| Epimedoside A | 89 ± 4.7 | 87.9 ± 3.1 | 90.6 ± 4.4 | 85.6 ± 3.7 | |
| Baohuoside V | 98.6 ± 8.7 | 100 ± 6.5 | 100.9 ± 7.8 | 78.5 ± 3.8 | |
| Corylifol A | 86.1 ± 3.3 | 85.3 ± 1.8 | 94.6 ± 0.9 | 103.8 ± 2.6 | |
| 4’-O-Methyl-broussochalcone | 81.4 ± 2.9 | 85.4 ± 2.4 | 95.4 ± 3.6 | 97.5 ± 2.3 | |
| Anhydroicaritin | 85.2 ± 2.2 | 83.4 ± 6.6 | 86.2 ± 1.5 | 81.8 ± 2.4 | |
| Icariin | 95.7 ± 3.6 | 101.4 ± 3.7 | 95.5 ± 3.2 | 101.5 ± 5.7 | |
The compounds were tested in different concentrations (1 µM, 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM) for 48 h. Data is normalized to the control vehicle group (cells with medium and DMSO).
Figure 1Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) production of 3D human osteoarthritic chondrocyte pellet cultures after two weeks in chondro-permissive medium supplemented with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) compounds. Glycosaminoglycan content was normalized to the amount of DNA. The most effective doses of compounds which could promote GAG production versus control vehicle (C vehicle) group in 3/3 donors are shown; for each donor three experimental replicates were analyzed. For statistical analysis using Graphpad Prism, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test (multiple comparison) was applied. ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0005, **** p < 0.0001 versus control vehicle. Vanilic acid (VA), Epimedin A (Epi A) and C (Epi C), 2′′-O-rhamnosylicariside II (2-O-rhs II), Icariin, Psoralidin (PS), Protocatechuicaldehyde (PCA), 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF).
Figure 2Transcriptional level of catabolic genes matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) a) MMP1 b) MMP3 c) MMP13, pro-inflammatory gene d) cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and anabolic marker genes e) collagen type II (COL-II) and f) aggrecan (ACAN) in Phase II (short term pellets) simultaneously treated with TCM compounds and IL-1β/TNF-α versus control vehicle (C vehicle) group in human OA chondrocytes. n = 3; n indicates the number of human OA donors; for each donor three experimental replicates were analyzed. Data are normalized to the levels of control groups. For statistical analysis using Graphpad Prism, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test (multiple comparisons) was applied. * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0005, **** p < 0.0001, ns (non-significant).
Figure 3Biochemical analysis of the osteoarthritic chondrocyte pellets (long term) in the inflammatory model. a) GAG production per DNA in three different phases of the inflammatory model. b) The effect of TCM compounds on GAG/DNA ratio in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes in phase III after induction of inflammation normalized to control vehicle group (C vehicle). n = 3; n indicates the number of human OA chondrocytes donors; for each donor three experimental replicates were analyzed. For statistical analysis using Graphpad Prism, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (multiple comparisons) for Figure 3a and Dunnett’s post hoc test (multiple comparisons) for Figure 3b were applied. * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0005, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Histological and immunohistochemical characterization of pellets from OA chondrocytes in the inflammatory model (long term). a) Saf-O staining, COL-II and ACAN immunostaining of pellets in three different phases as the control groups (Phase I, Phase II, Phase III). b) and after 14 days of treatment with the TCM compounds in phase III (VA, Epi C, PS, PCA, 4-HBA, 5-HMF). Scale bars = 100 μm.
List of 34 tested Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) compounds extracted from XLGB with their chemical formula, molecular weight and component herb.
| No | Name of the Compound | Molecular Formula | Molecular Weight | Component Herb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 126 | H.E |
| 2 | Protocatechuicaldehyde | C7H6O3 | 138 | R.S |
| 3 | Vanilic acid | C8H8O4 | 168 | R.S |
| 4 | 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | C7H6O3 | 138 | R.S |
| 5 | Chlorogenic acid | C16H18O9 | 354 | H.E |
| 6 | Cryptochlorogenic acid | C16H18O9 | 354 | H.E |
| 7 | Loganic acid | C16H24O10 | 376 | R.D |
| 8 | Loganin | C17H26O10 | 390 | R.D |
| 9 | Isobavachalcone | C20H20O4 | 324 | F.P |
| 10 | Sweroside | C16H22O9 | 358 | R.D |
| 11 | (+)-Cycloolivil | C20H24O7 | 376 | H.E |
| 12 | Baohuside I | C27H30O10 | 514 | H.E |
| 13 | 2′′- | C33H40O14 | 660 | H.E |
| 14 | Epimedin A | C39H50O2 | 838 | H.E |
| 15 | Epimedin B | C38H48O19 | 808 | H.E |
| 16 | Epimedin C | C39H50O19 | 822 | H.E |
| 17 | Isobavachin | C20H20O4 | 324 | F.P |
| 18 | Bavachin | C20H20O4 | 324 | F.P |
| 19 | Bavachinin | C21H22O4 | 338 | F.P |
| 20 | Neobavaisoflavone | C20H18O4 | 322 | F.P |
| 21 | Corylin | C20H16O4 | 320 | F.P |
| 22 | Epimedin A1 | C39H50O20 | 838 | H.E |
| 23 | Psoralen | C11H6O3 | 186 | F.P |
| 24 | Isopsoralen | C11H6O3 | 186 | F.P |
| 25 | ( | C18H24O | 256 | F.P |
| 26 | Psoralidin | C20H16O5 | 336 | F.P |
| 27 | Asperosaponin VI | C47H76O18 | 390 | R.D |
| 28 | Baohuside II | C26H28O10 | 500 | H.E |
| 29 | Epimedoside A | C32H38O15 | 662 | H.E |
| 30 | Baohuside V | C39H50O19 | 822 | H.E |
| 31 | Corylifol A | C25H26O4 | 390 | F.P |
| 32 | 4′-Methylbavachalcone | C21H22O4 | 338 | F.P |
| 33 | Icaitin | C21H20O6 | 368 | H.E |
| 34 | Icariin | C33H40O15 | 676 | H.E |
H.E.: Herba Epimedi; R.S.: Radix ET Rhizoma Salviae; R.D.: Radix Dipsaci; F.P.: Fructus Psoraleae.
Description of experimental groups.
| Pellet Culture | Group | Culture Phase I | Culture Phase II | Culture Phase III | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Time | Compound | Time | Compound | ||
| Control (IL-1β/TNFα) | 1 week | 3 days | -- | n/a | ||
| Short term | Treatment group (IL-1β/TNFα + compound) | 1 week | 3 days | + | n/a | |
| Control (IL-1β/TNFα) | 2 weeks | 3 days | -- | 2 weeks | -- | |
| Long term | Treatment group (IL-1β/TNFα - compound) | 2 weeks | 3 days | + | 2 weeks | + |
a. Primers and probes (Applied Biosystems).
| Gene | Probe Type | Assay ID |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5′ FAM-3′ NFQ | Hs00899658_m1 |
|
| 5′ FAM-3′ NFQ | Hs00968305_m1 |
|
| 5′ FAM-3′ NFQ | Hs99999901_s1 |
MMP1: matrix metalloproteinase 1; MMP3: matrix metalloproteinase 3; FAM: Carboxyfluorescein; NFQ: nonfluorescent quencher a. Human Gene Expression Assays (ThemoFisher Scientific). b.
b. Custom Designed Primer/Probe (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland).
| Gene | Primer/Probe Type | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
|
| Primer forward (5′-3′) | CGGCCACTCCTTAGGTCTTG |
|
| Primer forward (5′-3′) | TTGTACCCGGACAGGATTCTATG |
|
| Primer forward (5′-3′) | GGCAATAGCAGGTTCACGTACA |
|
| Primer forward (5′-3′) | AGTCCTCAAGCCTCCTGTACTCA |
COL2A1: collagen type II; MMP13: matrix metalloproteinase 13; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; ACAN: aggrecan; FAM: Carboxyfluorescein; TAMRA: Tetramethylrhodamine.