Literature DB >> 33403944

Current Models for Development of Disease-Modifying Osteoarthritis Drugs.

Meagan J Makarczyk1,2, Qi Gao3, Yuchen He1, Zhong Li1, Michael S Gold4, Mark C Hochberg5, Bruce A Bunnell6, Rocky S Tuan7, Stuart B Goodman3,8, Hang Lin1,2,9.   

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful and disabling disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Symptom-alleviating treatments exist, although none with long-term efficacy. Furthermore, there are currently no disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) with demonstrated efficacy in OA patients, which is, in part, attributed to a lack of full understanding of the pathogenesis of OA. The inability to translate findings from basic research to clinical applications also highlights the deficiencies in the available OA models at simulating the clinically relevant pathologies and responses to treatments in humans. In this review, the current status in the development of DMOADs will be first presented, with special attention to those in Phase II-IV clinical trials. Next, current in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo OA models are summarized and the respective advantages and disadvantages of each are highlighted. Of note, the development and application of microphysiological or tissue-on-a-chip systems for modeling OA in humans are presented and the issues that need to be addressed in the future are discussed. Microphysiological systems should be given serious consideration for their inclusion in the DMOAD development pipeline, both for their ability to predict drug safety and efficacy in human clinical trials at present, as well as for their potential to serve as a test platform for personalized medicine. Impact statement At present, no disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drugs (DMOADs) have been approved for widespread clinical use by regulatory bodies. The failure of developing effective DMOADs is likely owing to multiple factors, not the least of which are the intrinsic differences between the intact human knee joint and the preclinical models. This work summarizes the current OA models for the development of DMOADs, discusses the advantages/disadvantages of each, and then proposes future model development to aid in the discovery of effective and personalized DMOADs. The review also highlights the microphysiological systems, which are emerging as a new platform for drug development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs; microphysiological system; models; osteoarthritis; personalized medicine; tissue-on-a-chip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33403944      PMCID: PMC8098772          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2020.0309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  156 in total

Review 1.  Explant models for meniscus metabolism, injury, repair, and healing.

Authors:  Solaiman Tarafder; Gayoung Park; Chang H Lee
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.417

Review 2.  Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  S Glyn-Jones; A J R Palmer; R Agricola; A J Price; T L Vincent; H Weinans; A J Carr
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Molecular changes in human osteoarthritic cartilage after 3 weeks of oral administration of BAY 12-9566, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor.

Authors:  Richard L Leff; Ileana Elias; Mirela Ionescu; Agnes Reiner; A Robin Poole
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Cell death in human articular chondrocyte: a morpho-functional study in micromass model.

Authors:  M Battistelli; S Salucci; E Olivotto; A Facchini; M Minguzzi; S Guidotti; S Pagani; F Flamigni; R M Borzì; A Facchini; E Falcieri
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Meniscal tissue explants response depends on level of dynamic compressive strain.

Authors:  B Zielinska; M Killian; M Kadmiel; M Nelsen; T L Haut Donahue
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  A small-molecule inhibitor of the Wnt pathway (SM04690) as a potential disease modifying agent for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  V Deshmukh; H Hu; C Barroga; C Bossard; S Kc; L Dellamary; J Stewart; K Chiu; M Ibanez; M Pedraza; T Seo; L Do; S Cho; J Cahiwat; B Tam; J R S Tambiah; J Hood; N E Lane; Y Yazici
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Biological Effects of Phosphocitrate on Osteoarthritic Articular Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; Atiya M Franklin; David R Mauerhan; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2017-05-31

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain.

Authors:  Terence W O'Neill; David T Felson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Animal models of osteoarthritis: classification, update, and measurement of outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Ganesh Narayanan; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  The Role of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Senescence in Osteoarthritis Initiation and Progression.

Authors:  Yeri Alice Rim; Yoojun Nam; Ji Hyeon Ju
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  6 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Reconstruction: Design Criteria for a Humanized Microphysiological System.

Authors:  Trivia Frazier; Christopher Williams; Michael Henderson; Tamika Duplessis; Emma Rogers; Xiying Wu; Katie Hamel; Elizabeth C Martin; Omair Mohiuddin; Shahensha Shaik; Ram Devireddy; Brian G Rowan; Daniel J Hayes; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Advances in Use of Nanomaterials for Musculoskeletal Regeneration.

Authors:  Josef Jampilek; Daniela Placha
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 3.  Gender-Related Aspects in Osteoarthritis Development and Progression: A Review.

Authors:  Maria Peshkova; Alexey Lychagin; Marina Lipina; Berardo Di Matteo; Giuseppe Anzillotti; Flavio Ronzoni; Nastasia Kosheleva; Anastasia Shpichka; Valeriy Royuk; Victor Fomin; Eugene Kalinsky; Peter Timashev; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Miniature Joint System for Disease Modeling and Drug Testing.

Authors:  Zhong Li; Zixuan Lin; Silvia Liu; Haruyo Yagi; Xiurui Zhang; Lauren Yocum; Monica Romero-Lopez; Claire Rhee; Meagan J Makarcyzk; Ilhan Yu; Eileen N Li; Madalyn R Fritch; Qi Gao; Kek Boon Goh; Benjamen O'Donnell; Tingjun Hao; Peter G Alexander; Bhushan Mahadik; John P Fisher; Stuart B Goodman; Bruce A Bunnell; Rocky S Tuan; Hang Lin
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 17.521

5.  Modeling early changes associated with cartilage trauma using human-cell-laden hydrogel cartilage models.

Authors:  Chunrong He; Karen L Clark; Jian Tan; Hecheng Zhou; Rocky S Tuan; Hang Lin; Song Wu; Peter G Alexander
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 8.079

6.  Urolithin A Protects Chondrocytes From Mechanical Overloading-Induced Injuries.

Authors:  Yuchen He; Lauren Yocum; Peter G Alexander; Michael J Jurczak; Hang Lin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.