Literature DB >> 31728879

A quarter century of decline of autopsies in the Netherlands.

Bartholomeus G H Latten1, Lucy I H Overbeek2, Bela Kubat3, Axel Zur Hausen3, Leo J Schouten4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Autopsy rates have been declining worldwide. The present study reports the outcome of a retrospective analysis of all non-forensic autopsies in the Netherlands over a course of 25 years, and compares these with the most recent Dutch study.
METHOD: Retrospectively, 25 years of data on clinical autopsies from the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA) was paired with the mortality registry (Statistics Netherlands).
RESULTS: The crude prevalence of autopsies declined from 7.07% in 1991 to 2.73% in 2015. After adjusting for age at death, there was no difference in autopsy rate between males and females. An increasing age significantly decreased the autopsy rate.
CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, clinical autopsies have been declining over the last quarter century. Age at death, but not sex, was associated with the autopsy rate. These different results stress the importance of correct collection and analysis methods of data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autopsy; Autopsy rate; Quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728879     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00572-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  14 in total

1.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates.

Authors:  H J Kim; M P Fay; E J Feuer; D N Midthune
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Elizabeth C Burton; Kathryn M McDonald; Lee Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study.

Authors:  Stefanie Schwanda-Burger; Holger Moch; Jörg Muntwyler; Franco Salomon
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  The slow death of autopsies: a retrospective analysis of the autopsy prevalence rate in Austria from 1990 to 2009.

Authors:  Sabrina Gaensbacher; Thomas Waldhoer; Andrea Berzlanovich
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy.

Authors:  Julian L Burton; James Underwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Aging in the Netherlands: state of the art and science.

Authors:  Carolien H M Smits; Hugo K van den Beld; Marja J Aartsen; Johannes J F Schroots
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2013-09-02

7.  The death of the hospital autopsy in Australia? The hospital autopsy rate is declining dramatically.

Authors:  Aditi Raut; Juliana Andrici; Aldo Severino; Anthony J Gill
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 5.306

8.  The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist.

Authors:  Chantal C H J Kuijpers; Judith Fronczek; Frank R W van de Goot; Hans W M Niessen; Paul J van Diest; Mehdi Jiwa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  [Autopsy rates in Germany].

Authors:  M Grassow-Narlik; M Wessolly; J Friemann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities.

Authors:  Jan G van den Tweel; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical diagnoses vs. autopsy findings in early deceased septic patients in the intensive care: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rob G H Driessen; Bartholomeus G H Latten; Dennis C J J Bergmans; Riquette P M G Hulsewe; Johanna W M Holtkamp; Iwan C C van der Horst; Bela Kubat; Ronny M Schnabel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  M Arfan Ikram; Guy Brusselle; Mohsen Ghanbari; André Goedegebure; M Kamran Ikram; Maryam Kavousi; Brenda C T Kieboom; Caroline C W Klaver; Robert J de Knegt; Annemarie I Luik; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Frank J A van Rooij; Bruno H Stricker; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Trudy Voortman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.