M Grassow-Narlik1, M Wessolly2, J Friemann3. 1. Bundesverband Deutscher Pathologen e.V., Robert-Koch-Platz 9, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland. bv@pathologie.de. 2. Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Deutschland. michael.wessolly@uk-essen.de. 3. Institut für Pathologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Paulmannshöher Str. 14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland. johannes.friemann@klinikum-luedenscheid.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2015 the German professional Association of Pathologists conducted a survey to establish a baseline for an autopsy rate in Germany and to collect data from 2005-2014, as hospitals must meet a fixed autopsy quota to receive the supplementary payment for autopsies as stated in the law for hospital structure (KHSG 10.12.2015). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey comprised 12 questions and was sent to 450 institutes of pathology. The overall return rate was 38%. The data of the different institutional types was grouped and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of 86.416 reported autopsies on deceased adults in Germany from 2005-2014, 47% took place in university hospitals, 36% in local hospitals and 17% in privately run practices. Out of 4320 autopsies on deceased children and adolescents, the majority (83%) were performed at university hospitals, 8%, and 9%, respectively, at the other two entity types. Of the 14.047 fetal autopsies, 55% were done at university hospitals, 25% at other hospitals and 20% at private practices. From 2005 to 2014 the overall number of autopsies decreased by 30%, independently of the institute type. Within each group of institution types there was a wide range in numbers and rate of autopsies done per year: university hospitals total 0‑428, quota of 3,4-19,4%; local hospitals 0‑324, quota of 1,1-30,8%; private practices 0‑268, quota 0,4-5,2%. CONCLUSION: To this day, there is no universal system to document and register hospital autopsy rates in Germany. Due to the high range of yearly autopsy rates even within the different groups of institute types, the threshold for the autopsy rate that must be met to obtain the supplementary payment should be low in the beginning.
BACKGROUND: In 2015 the German professional Association of Pathologists conducted a survey to establish a baseline for an autopsy rate in Germany and to collect data from 2005-2014, as hospitals must meet a fixed autopsy quota to receive the supplementary payment for autopsies as stated in the law for hospital structure (KHSG 10.12.2015). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey comprised 12 questions and was sent to 450 institutes of pathology. The overall return rate was 38%. The data of the different institutional types was grouped and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of 86.416 reported autopsies on deceased adults in Germany from 2005-2014, 47% took place in university hospitals, 36% in local hospitals and 17% in privately run practices. Out of 4320 autopsies on deceased children and adolescents, the majority (83%) were performed at university hospitals, 8%, and 9%, respectively, at the other two entity types. Of the 14.047 fetal autopsies, 55% were done at university hospitals, 25% at other hospitals and 20% at private practices. From 2005 to 2014 the overall number of autopsies decreased by 30%, independently of the institute type. Within each group of institution types there was a wide range in numbers and rate of autopsies done per year: university hospitals total 0‑428, quota of 3,4-19,4%; local hospitals 0‑324, quota of 1,1-30,8%; private practices 0‑268, quota 0,4-5,2%. CONCLUSION: To this day, there is no universal system to document and register hospital autopsy rates in Germany. Due to the high range of yearly autopsy rates even within the different groups of institute types, the threshold for the autopsy rate that must be met to obtain the supplementary payment should be low in the beginning.
Authors: Bartholomeus G H Latten; Lucy I H Overbeek; Bela Kubat; Axel Zur Hausen; Leo J Schouten Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 8.082