| Literature DB >> 31728339 |
Georgios A Gkafas1, Marianthi Hatziioannou1, Emmanouil E Malandrakis1, Costas S Tsigenopoulos2, Ioannis T Karapanagiotidis1, Elena Mente1, Dimitrios Vafidis1, Athanasios Exadactylos1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comprehensively detailed information on population dynamics for benthic species is crucial since potential admixture of individuals could shift the genetic subdivision and age structure during a full breeding period. The apparent genetic impact of the potential recruitment strategy of Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus is still under research. For this reason the present study was focused on genetic variation of the species over a given continuous year period in a semi-enclosed gulf of the Aegean Sea.Entities:
Keywords: Carapace length; Generation interval; Heterozygosity fitness correlation; Inbreeding; Microsatellites; Nephrops norvegicus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31728339 PMCID: PMC6842237 DOI: 10.1186/s40709-019-0103-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Res (Thessalon) ISSN: 1790-045X Impact factor: 1.889
Fig. 1Study area of Pagasitikos gulf and sampling site (black dot) of the experimental trawling (after [2])
Gene diversity (G), number of alleles (No), allelic richness (R), inbreeding coefficient index (FIS) per locus and sex for N. norvegicus
| Loci | Females | Males | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | No | R | FIS | G | No | R | FIS | |
| 0.898 | 15 | 14.158 | 0.898 | 10 | 9.976 | − 0.054 | ||
| 0.955 | 23 | 22.168 | 0.941 | 21 | 20.232 | 0.024 | ||
| 0.830 | 8 | 7.834 | 0.825 | 10 | 9.644 | |||
| 0.716 | 9 | 8.129 | − 0.084 | 0.676 | 7 | 6.765 | − 0.438 | |
| 0.958 | 24 | 23.068 | 0.941 | 23 | 21.845 | − 0.033 | ||
| 0.797 | 11 | 10.620 | 0.783 | 11 | 10.485 | 0.034 | ||
| 0.859 | 15 | 12.559 | 0.844 | 13.66 | 13.157 | − 0.041 | ||
Mean values of MLH, IR and HL for both sexes along with confidence intervals (CI) values of t test; significances are in italics
Estimates of generation effective size (Ne) and generation interval (GI) for N. norvegicus sampled individuals
| Ne | GI paternal | GI maternal | Overall GI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 1902 | 5.89 | 6.28 | 5.41 |
| CI 95% low | 1749 | 5.89 | 6.08 | 5.25 |
| CI 95% upper | 2444 | 5.97 | 6.69 | 5.71 |
Fig. 2Frequencies of Carapace Length (CL) distribution in each size class per month, separately for female (white bars) and male (black bars) individuals
Fig. 3Plot of mean Carapace Length per month for each sex. Asterisks denote females and diamond-shape males, respectively
Fig. 4Regression plots of the three different measures of heterozygosity against the carapace length in male individuals (a MLH; b IR; c HL), and female individuals (d MLH; e IR; f HL). Dashed lines represent confidence intervals (95%)
Regression analysis of variance of carapace length against MLH, IR and HL for female and male N. norvegicus sampled individuals; significances are in italics
| MLH | IR | HL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Females | |||
| Equation | y = 33.30 + 4.053x | y = 37.34 − 4.042x | y = 37.39 − 4.188x |
| | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.052 |
| | 4.870 | 4.870 | 5.36 |
| | |||
| Males | |||
| Equation | y = 54.01 − 24.89x | y = 29.18 + 24.83x | y = 30.42 + 22.22x |
| | 0.352 | 0.352 | 0.306 |
| | 17.95 | 17.95 | 14.55 |
| | |||