| Literature DB >> 35646317 |
Ioannis Konstantinidis1,2, Georgios A Gkafas2, Vasillis Papathanasiou3, Sotiris Orfanidis3, Frithjof C Küpper4,5, Sophie Arnaud-Haond6, Athanasios Exadactylos2.
Abstract
We investigated the population dynamics of a highly clonal marine angiosperm, Cymodocea nodosa, in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, to identify the historical dynamics, demography, and connectivity of the species in the area. Eighteen microsatellite loci were used in conjunction with coalescent methods to investigate the genetic structure and demographic history of C. nodosa meadows. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) modeling was used to examine the pattern of divergence over time in the context of environmental change over the course of the Quaternary period. ABC analysis revealed an initial split of the C. nodosa populations between the north-western, northern, and north-eastern Aegean Sea during the Pleistocene epoch, followed by a more recent divergence of the north-western population and the central-western part of the Aegean Sea. According to the results, the most parsimonious historical scenario is that of a pervasive genetic signature of the effects of the drop in sea level during the Pleistocene epoch. This scenario supports the isolation of the north-western, north, and north-eastern area, and the subsequent recolonization after post-glaciation sea level rise that may explain the north-western differentiation as well present-day detected dispersion of C. nodosa.Entities:
Keywords: Cymodocea nodosa; Holocene; Mediterranean Sea; Pleistocene; migration; population structure; sea‐level rise
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646317 PMCID: PMC9131598 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 3.167
FIGURE 1Sampling sites of Cymodocea nodosa meadows; 1: Lemnos (8), 2: Imeros (32), 3: Fanari (34), 4: Vrasidas (34), 5: Nea Karvali (22). 6: Viamyl (23), 7: Ag. Triada (38), 8: Chalkidiki (9), 9: eastern Pagasitikos Gulf (47), 10: western Pagasitikos Gulf (36), 11: Maliakos Gulf (37), 12: Cyprus (11). Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of samples. The color pattern illustrates blue for north‐eastern; green for northern; red for north‐western; purple for central‐western. Pies indicate the genetic clusters (K = 2) as having been implemented in STRUCTURE software
(A) Contemporary migration rates through BayesAss software (SD are given in the parentheses). (B) Migrate results
| N_Aegean | NE_Aegean | NW_Aegean | CW_Aegean | Cyprus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | |||||
| N_Aegean | — | 0.015 (0.007) | 0.030 (0.011) | 0.010 (0.006) | 0.004 (0.004) |
| NE_Aegean | 0.008 (0.007) | — | 0.008 (0.007) | 0.007 (0.007) | 0.009 (0.008) |
| NW_Aegean | 0.005 (0.005) | 0.005 (0.005) | — | 0.114 (0.025) | 0.008 (0.008) |
| CW_Aegean | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.003 (0.003) | 0.0042 (0.004) | — | 0.053 (0.015) |
| Cyprus | 0.021 (0.02) | 0.021 (0.02) | 0.021 (0.02) | 0.021 (0.02) | — |
| B | |||||
| N_Aegean | 3.177 | 11.905 | 0.601 | ||
| NE_Aegean | 2.940 | — | 3.194 | 2.261 | |
| NW_Aegean | 0.750 | 0.703 | — | 4.595 | |
| CW_Aegean | 1.596 | 6.339 | 4.354 | — | |
(A) Values are given as m, the proportion of migrants per generation from each population on the left (row headings) to the populations on the right (column headings). (B) Historical migration rates (M) from each population on the left (row headings) into the populations on the right (column headings).
Summary population anthropogenic impact (AI), number of SUs (N), clonal (MLG, MLL), and genetic measures (HEXP: expected Heterozygosity; HOBS: observed Heterozygosity; Allelic richness, number of alleles, fixation index FIS) estimated for population samples of Cymodocea nodosa across the study area
| Populations | AI |
| MLG | MLL | HEXP | HOBS | Allelic richness | No_alleles | FIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEM | Small | 8 | 8 | 0.569 | 0.507 | 3.271 | 3.556 | 0.100 | |
| IME | High | 32 | 32 | 0.716 | 0.543 | 4.233 | 7.056 |
| |
| FAN | High | 34 | 34 | 0.749 | 0.637 | 4.796 | 8.333 |
| |
| VRA | Small | 34 | 33 | 1 | 0.703 | 0.575 | 4.395 | 7.556 |
|
| NKA | High | 22 | 22 | 0.690 | 0.651 | 4.236 | 6.500 | 0.091 | |
| VAI | High | 23 | 23 | 0.625 | 0.532 | 3.636 | 5.167 |
| |
| AGT | High | 38 | 38 | 0.695 | 0.566 | 3.946 | 7.056 |
| |
| CHA | High | 9 | 9 | 0.595 | 0.778 | 3.111 | 3.111 | −0.363 | |
| EPA | Mediate | 47 | 47 | 0.681 | 0.548 | 4.114 | 7.500 |
| |
| WPA | High | 36 | 36 | 0.662 | 0.600 | 3.920 | 6.111 |
| |
| MAG | High | 37 | 35 | 2 | 0.662 | 0.672 | 4.067 | 6.500 | 0.041 |
| CYP | Small | 11 | 11 | 0.602 | 0.582 | 3.378 | 3.833 | 0.000 |
Values in bold indicate significance for adjusted nominal level (5%) for multiple comparisons (p < .0023).
Abbreviations: AGT, Ag. Triada; CHA, Chalkidiki; CYP, Cyprus; EPA, eastern Pagasitikos; FAN, Fanari; IME, Imeros; LEM, Lemnos; MAG, Maliakos Gulf; NKA, Nea Karvali; VIA, Viamyl; VRA, Vrasidas; WPA, western Pagasitikos.
FST pairwise values between the twelve meadows in the eastern Mediterranean Sea
| LEM | IME | FAN | VRA | NKA | VIA | AGT | CHA | EPA | WPA | MAG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IME | 0.072 | 0 | |||||||||
| FAN |
|
| 0 | ||||||||
| VRA |
|
|
| 0 | |||||||
| NKA |
|
|
|
| 0 | ||||||
| VIA |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | |||||
| AGT |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | ||||
| CHA | 0.255 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | |||
| EPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | ||
| WPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | |
| MAG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| CYP | 0.294 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.293 |
|
|
|
Values in bold indicate significance for adjusted nominal level (5%) for multiple comparisons (p < .000758).
Abbreviations: AGT, Ag. Triada; CHA, Chalkidiki; CYP, Cyprus; EPA, eastern Pagasitikos; FAN, Fanari; IME, Imeros; LEM, Lemnos; MAG, Maliakos Gulf; NKA, Nea Karvali; VIA, Viamyl; VRA, Vrasidas; WPA, western Pagasitikos.
FIGURE 2Factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) of Cymodocea nodosa meadows multilocus scores computed using GENETIX. Multilocus scores are computed in the bivariate space defined by the first two factorial components. Dotted lines pinpoint nominal distinctions across the east–west and north–south axes (south‐eastern: Cyprus; north‐eastern: Lemnos, Imeros; North: Nea Karvali, Vrasidas, Fanari; north‐western: Agia Triada, Viamyl, Chalkidiki; central‐western: eastern Pagasitikos, western Pagasitikos, Maliakos Gulf)
FIGURE 3Circos plots of source‐sink migration dynamics as implemented in the R platform (v.3.2.3). Plot A corresponds to contemporary migration directionality (through BayesAss software) and B to historical migration (through Migrate software). The width of migration curves reflects the relative amount of migration. NW: north‐western; CW: central‐western; N: northern; NE: north‐eastern
FIGURE 4The most supported demographic scenario (scenario 13) using approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). NW: north‐western; CW: central‐western; N: northern; NE: north‐eastern. t2 is the divergent time in the Holocene epoch and t3 is the divergent time in the Pleistocene epoch (axis is not on scale)
DIYABC prior distribution settings and parameter estimate using 13 × 106 data sets simulated under scenario 13
| Parameter | Prior range | Mode | Median | 95% CI low | 95% CI high |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ne1 (N Aegean) | 10–107 | 2.67 × 104 | 4.93 × 104 | 1.37 × 104 | 4.90 × 105 |
| Ne1 (NE Aegean) | 10–107 | 1.27 × 104 | 2.30 × 104 | 6.41 × 103 | 2.58 × 105 |
| Ne3 (NW Aegean) | 10–107 | 9.15 × 103 | 1.49 × 104 | 4.30 × 103 | 1.48 × 105 |
| Ne4 (CW Aegean) | 10–107 | 1.53 × 105 | 2.44 × 105 | 3.97 × 104 | 2.82 × 106 |
| Na (Ancestral) | 10–105 | 10 | 223 | 17.5 | 2.42 × 103 |
| t0 (generations) | 10–104 | 13.1 | 324 | 16.6 | 4.84 × 103 |
| t2 (generations) | 10–106 | 1.53 × 103 | 2.93 × 103 | 476 | 1.73 × 104 |
| t3 (generations) | 10–2 × 106 | 9.27 × 103 | 1.33 × 104 | 3.74 × 103 | 6.85 × 104 |
1. (Ne: contemporary effective population size) 2. a: Ancestral, N: northern, NE: north‐eastern, NW: north‐western, CW: central‐western.