Literature DB >> 14983018

Stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild fish population.

Bryan D Neff1.   

Abstract

Conservation programs use breeding protocols to increase genomic divergence (by mating genetically dissimilar individuals) in an attempt to circumvent population declines resulting from inbreeding depression. However, disruption of either beneficial gene complexes or local genetic adaptations can lead to outbreeding depression, and thus, there should be a reduction in fitness of individuals at either end of the genomic divergence continuum. Although such simultaneous inbreeding and outbreeding depression has been observed in plant populations, it rarely has been demonstrated in animal populations. Here, I use both genetic and phenotypic measures to show that there is stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild population of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). I also show that breeding individuals that exercise mate choice produce offspring that are closer to the optimal level of genomic divergence than random mating alone would predict.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14983018      PMCID: PMC356959          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307522100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Fluctuating Asymmetry as a Bioindicator of Stress: Comparing Efficacy of Analyses Involving Multiple Traits.

Authors:  Brian Leung; Mark R Forbes; David Houle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Parentage analysis with incomplete sampling of candidate parents and offspring.

Authors:  B D Neff; J Repka; M R Gross
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history.

Authors:  A Tsitrone; F Rousset; P David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D W Coltman; J Slate
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back.

Authors:  P Jarne; P J Lagoda
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Genetic paternity analysis and breeding success in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus).

Authors:  B D Neff
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Statistical confidence in parentage analysis with incomplete sampling: how many loci and offspring are needed?

Authors:  B D Neff; J Repka; M R Gross
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Dynamic adjustment of parental care in response to perceived paternity.

Authors:  B D Neff; M R Gross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Social pairing and female mating fidelity predicted by restriction fragment length polymorphism similarity at the major histocompatibility complex in a songbird.

Authors:  Corey R Freeman-Gallant; Michael Meguerdichian; Nathaniel T Wheelwright; Suzanne V Sollecito
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  15 in total

1.  Genomic compatibility occurs over a wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parasite-mediated heterozygote advantage in an outbred songbird population.

Authors:  Elizabeth A MacDougall-Shackleton; Elizabeth P Derryberry; Johannes Foufopoulos; Andrew P Dobson; Thomas P Hahn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Mate choice for major histocompatibility complex genetic divergence as a bet-hedging strategy in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  Melissa L Evans; Mélanie Dionne; Kristina M Miller; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Complex Mhc-based mate choice in a wild passerine.

Authors:  Camille Bonneaud; Olivier Chastel; Pierre Federici; Helena Westerdahl; Gabriele Sorci
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish.

Authors:  Rike B Stelkens; Corinne Schmid; Oliver Selz; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Authors:  Marco Galaverni; Romolo Caniglia; Pietro Milanesi; Silvana Lapalombella; Elena Fabbri; Ettore Randi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Males with high genetic similarity to females sire more offspring in sperm competition in Peron's tree frog Litoria peronii.

Authors:  C D H Sherman; E Wapstra; T Uller; M Olsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Optimal level of inbreeding in the common lizard.

Authors:  M Richard; S Losdat; J Lecomte; M de Fraipont; J Clobert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The effect and relative importance of neutral genetic diversity for predicting parasitism varies across parasite taxa.

Authors:  María José Ruiz-López; Ryan J Monello; Matthew E Gompper; Lori S Eggert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Parental influences on pathogen resistance in brown trout embryos and effects of outcrossing within a river network.

Authors:  Emily S Clark; Rike B Stelkens; Claus Wedekind
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.