Literature DB >> 31724239

Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial.

Tae-Hwan Koo1, Young Woo Song1, Jae-Kook Cha1, Ui-Won Jung1, Chang-Sung Kim1,2,3, Jung-Seok Lee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study histologically analyzed biopsy samples obtained from sites of damaged extraction socket grafting using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) with coverage by a collagen membrane.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred patients participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial of extraction socket grafts performed in cases of periodontally compromised teeth. All participants were blinded to their group allocations, and each material was grafted with coverage by collagen membranes after extraction of the tooth and removal of granulation tissue. At implant placement at 4 months, a biopsy was harvested at the implant site using a trephine was analyzed histologically.
RESULTS: Eighty-five biopsy samples were acquired, of which 81 were finally included in the histologic analysis (42 in DBBM and 39 in DPBM group). Both DBBM and DPBM groups showed comparable proportions of residual biomaterial (12.37 ± 5.67% and 12.21 ± 5.75%, respectively), newly formed bone (15.07 ± 10.52% and 18.47 ± 11.47%, respectively), and nonmineralized tissue (72.56 ± 10.07% and 71.55 ± 15.47%, respectively). There were no significant differences in these histologic parameters between the two groups with different biomaterials.
CONCLUSION: Comparable histologic bone formation was found in both socket grafted groups with DBBM or DPBM covered by collagen membranes in periodontally damaged extraction sockets. However, a wide variation in new bone formation was found after 4 months of postsurgical healing and a tendency of higher new bone formation was shown at damaged sockets that had an intact unilateral residual wall regardless of buccal or lingual side.
© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; bone substitutes; clinical research; clinical trials; guided tissue regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31724239     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  4 in total

1.  Are maxillary sinus variations related to maxillary sinus diameters?

Authors:  Halil Ayyildiz; Faruk Akgunlu
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 1.882

2.  Bone Regeneration Assessment of Polycaprolactone Membrane on Critical-Size Defects in Rat Calvaria.

Authors:  Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi; Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli; Tamires Mello Francatti; Ana Carulina Rezende de Moares Ferreira; Járede Carvalho Pereira; Hesham Mohammed Al-Sharani; Flavia de Almeida Lucas; Leonardo Perez Faverani
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09

3.  FasL Is Required for Osseous Healing in Extraction Sockets in Mice.

Authors:  Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman; Patrick Heimel; Jung-Seok Lee; Stefan Tangl; Franz J Strauss; Alexandra Stähli; Eva Matalová; Reinhard Gruber
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Vertical ridge augmentation feasibility using unfixed collagen membranes and particulate bone substitutes: A 1- to 7-year retrospective single-cohort observational study.

Authors:  Jung-Seok Lee; Jin-Young Park; Hye-Min Chung; Young Woo Song; Franz-Josef Strauss
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.259

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.