| Literature DB >> 34135904 |
Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman1,2, Patrick Heimel2,3,4, Jung-Seok Lee1,5, Stefan Tangl2,4, Franz J Strauss1,6,7, Alexandra Stähli8, Eva Matalová9, Reinhard Gruber1,4,8.
Abstract
Fas ligand (FasL) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily involved in the activation of apoptosis. Assuming that apoptosis is initiated after tooth extraction it is reasonable to suggest that FasL may play a pivotal role in the healing of extraction sockets. Herein, we tested the hypothesis of whether the lack of FasL impairs the healing of extraction sockets. To this end, we extracted upper right incisors of FasL knockout (KO) mice and their wildtype (WT) littermates. After a healing period of two weeks, bone volume over total volume (BV/TV) via µCT and descriptive histological analyses were performed. µCT revealed that BV/TV in the coronal region of the socket amounted to 39.4% in WT and 21.8% in KO, with a significant difference between the groups (p=0.002). Likewise, in the middle region of the socket, BV/TV amounted to 50.3% in WT and 40.8% in KO (p<0.001). In the apical part, however, no difference was noticed. Consistently, WT mice displayed a significantly higher median trabecular thickness and a lower trabecular separation when compared to the KO group at the coronal and central region of the socket. There was the overall tendency that in both, female and male mice, FasL affects bone regeneration. Taken together, these findings suggest that FasL deficiency may reduce bone regeneration during the healing process of extraction sockets.Entities:
Keywords: bone regenaration; dentistry; fasl; histology; knockout (KO); tooth extraction; µCT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34135904 PMCID: PMC8200669 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Region of interests (ROI) of the extraction socket for the µCT analysis. (A) The ROIs for the microCT analysis comprised the coronal (cyan), middle (purple) and apical (yellow) region through the entire volume of the tooth extraction site. (B) The plane oriented along the central alveolar socket was the reference for preparing the histological ground sections.
Figure 2Lack of FasL attenuates regeneration of the extraction socket. Sagittal view of the alveolar socket depicts the WT (A) and FasL KO mice (B). Quantitative analysis of the bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) displayed higher amounts of new bone volume in the WT mice in the coronal (C) and middle part (D) of the extraction socket compared to FasL KO mice. The apical region revealed no significant differences in BV/TV between WT and FasL KO mice (E). Statistical analysis was based on Mann‐Whitney U test, P values are given where there was significant differences. The bars show the median and female (black dots) and male mice (white dots) are distributed in the dot plots for the WT and KO group.
Figure 3Trabecular thickness (TbTh) and trabecular separation (TbSp) in the extraction sockets. FasL KO mice shows lower Tb.Th and higher Tb.Sp compared to WT mice in the coronal (A) and middle part (B) while no differences were observed in the apical part (C). Statistical analysis was based on Mann‐Whitney U test, P values are given where was found significant differences. The bars show the median with female (black dots) and male mice (white dots) are distributed in the dot plots.
Figure 4The features of the newly formed bone were similar for the WT (A) and the FasL KO mice (B). Overview photomicrographs (2x) depicting the woven network.
Figure 5The WT (A) and The FasL KO (B) mice revealed a structure like a growing tooth located at different areas of the alveolar socket in the overview image (2x). A higher magnification (20x) evidenced the “osteodentin mass” with dentin tubules (C, E) and enamel structure (D, F).