| Literature DB >> 33572318 |
Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi1, Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli1, Tamires Mello Francatti1, Ana Carulina Rezende de Moares Ferreira1, Járede Carvalho Pereira1, Hesham Mohammed Al-Sharani2,3, Flavia de Almeida Lucas4, Leonardo Perez Faverani1.
Abstract
Biomaterials for use in guided bone regeneration (GBR) are constantly being investigated and developed to improve clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the biological performance of different membranes during the bone healing process of 8 mm critical defects in rat calvaria in order to assess their influence on the quality of the newly formed bone. Seventy-two adult male rats were divided into three experimental groups (n = 24) based on the membranes used: the CG-membrane-free control group (only blood clot, negative control), BG-porcine collagen membrane group (Bio-Guide®, positive control), and the PCL-polycaprolactone (enriched with 5% hydroxyapatite) membrane group (experimental group). Histological and histometric analyses were performed at 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The quantitative data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). At 7 and 15 days, the inflammatory responses in the BG and PCL groups were significantly different (p < 0.05). The PCL group, at 15 days, showed a large area of newly formed bone. At 30 and 60 days postoperatively, the PCL and BG groups exhibited similar bone healing, including some specimens showing complete closure of the critical defect (p = 0.799). Thus, the PCL membrane was biocompatible, and has the potential to help with GBR procedures.Entities:
Keywords: bone regeneration; bone substitute; materials biocompatibility; materials testing; membranes; polycaprolactone; polymers
Year: 2021 PMID: 33572318 PMCID: PMC7916152 DOI: 10.3390/membranes11020124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375