| Literature DB >> 31723209 |
Nasser M Al-Daghri1, Enrica Torretta2, Pietro Barbacini2, Hannah Asare3, Cristian Ricci3, Daniele Capitanio2,4, Franca Rosa Guerini5, Shaun B Sabico1, Majed S Alokail1, Mario Clerici5,6, Cecilia Gelfi7,8.
Abstract
Recent studies on Saudi Arabians indicate a prevalence of dyslipidemia and vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D) in both normal weight and obese subjects. In the present study the sphingolipid pattern was investigated in 23 normolipidemic normal weight (NW), 46 vitamin D deficient dyslipidemic normal weight (-vitDNW) and 60 vitamin D deficient dyslipidemic obese (-vitDO) men and women by HPTLC-primuline profiling and LC-MS analyses. Results indicate higher levels of total ceramide (Cer) and dihydroceramide (dhCers C18-22) and lower levels of total sphingomyelins (SMs) and dihydrosphingomyelin (dhSM) not only in -vitDO subjects compared to NW, but also in -vitDNW individuals. A dependency on body mass index (BMI) was observed analyzing specific Cer acyl chains levels. Lower levels of C20 and 24 were observed in men and C24.2 in women, respectively. Furthermore, LC-MS analyses display dimorphic changes in NW, -vitDNW and -vitDO subjects. In conclusion, LC-MS data identify the independency of the axis high Cers, dhCers and SMs from obesity per se. Furthermore, it indicates that long chains Cers levels are specific target of weight gain and that circulating Cer and SM levels are linked to sexual dimorphism status and can contribute to predict obese related co-morbidities in men and women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31723209 PMCID: PMC6853956 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53122-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of participants. Continuous variables were described by median and interquartile range, categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages.
| Men | Women | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normolipidemic normal weight (NW) | Dyslipidemic normal weight (-vitDNW) | Obese (-vitDO) | Normolipidemic normal weight (NW) | Dyslipidemic normal weight (-vitDNW) | Obese (-vitDO) | |
| N (%) | 15 (11.6%) | 23 (17.8%) | 25 (19.4%) | 8 (6.2%) | 23 (17.8%) | 35 (27.1%) |
| Age (year) | 39 (35, 44) | 47.0 (32.0, 59.0) | 44.0 (31.0, 56.0) | 39 (26, 48.5) | 45.0 (35.0, 55.0) | 45.0 (40.0, 56.0) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.3 (22.0, 23.9) | 23.4 (22.2, 24.6) | 36.7 (34.7, 39.1) | 20.7 (19.4, 22.9) | 25.6 (24.0, 26.0) | 39.9 (37.6, 42.6) |
| WC (cm) | — | 88.9 (81.0, 93.0) | 117 (113, 123) | — | 91 (82, 102) | 105 (98.2, 112) |
| BP (cm) | — | 86.0 (39.0, 98.0) | 116 (53, 126) | — | 103 (94, 106) | 121 (115, 129) |
| SBP (mmHg) | — | 122 (113, 130) | 130 (120, 141) | — | 125 (110, 130) | 130 (117, 132) |
| DBP (mmHg) | — | 71.5 (68.0, 76.0) | 80.0 (68.5, 90.0) | — | 80.0 (70.0, 82.0) | 80.0 (72.0, 83.0) |
| GLU (mmol/l) | — | 6.3 (5.0, 9.9) | 7.0 (5.9, 14.4) | — | 6.2 (4.7, 11.8) | 8.0 (6.0, 11.6) |
| CHL (mmol/l) | 4.6 (4.3, 4.8) | 4.9 (4.4, 6.1) | 5.4 (4.7, 6.0) | 4.4 (4.0, 4.6) | 5.4 (4.7, 6.2) | 5.4 (4.7, 6.0) |
| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.76 (1.71, 1.86) | 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) | 0.8 (0.6, 0.8) | 1.47 (1.45, 1.63) | 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) |
| TRG (mmol/l) | 0.90 (0.7, 1.50) | 3.4 (3.0, 4.2) | 3.2 (2.9, 3.9) | 0.78 (0.65, 0.91) | 3.4 (2.8, 4.1) | 3.0 (2.7, 3.3) |
| 25(OH) D (nmol/l) | 75.4 (65.7, 88.9) | 32.7 (21.9, 40.8) | 34.0 (26.6, 37.6) | 78.9(65.2, 84.2 | 22.0 (14.4, 37.0) | 31.0 (21.5, 42.0) |
Notes: BMI Body Mass Index, WC Waist Circumference, BP Buttocks Perimeter, SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure, GLU Glucose, CHL Cholesterol, HDL High Density lipo-protein, TRG triglycerides.
Figure 1(A) Ceramides (Cers) (C14-C18) in sera from normolipidemic normal weight (NW) (n = 15), vitamin D deficient dyslipidemic normal weight (-vitDNW) (n = 46) and vitamin D deficient dyslipidemic obese (-vitDO) (n = 60) subjects by primuline /HPTLC densitometry. (B) Total Cer and dhCer in sub-pooled sera from NW vs –vitDNW vs –vitDO subjects by LC-MS analysis. (C) Sphingomyelins (SMs) (C14-C18) in sera from NW, -vitDNW and –vitDO subjects by primuline /HPTLC densitometry. (D) Total SM and dhSM in sub-pooled sera from NW vs –vitDNW vs –vitDO subjects by LC-MS analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA test, with Tukey post-hoc test. Data are expressed in log scale and reported as mean ± SD.
Figure 4Glycosphingolipid sex-related variations in sub-pooled sera of NW (A) and obese (B) men and women. LC-MS profiles of total hexosylceramide (HexCer) and dihexosylceramide (diHexCer) in sub-pooled sera of NW, -vitDNW, and -vitDO men (C) and women (D) are shown, together with LC-MS levels of C16:0 HexCer (C) and C24:1 diHexCer (D), resulted to be changed in women. Statistical analysis was performed by Student t-test for (A,B) and by ANOVA test, with Tukey post-hoc test for (C–F). Data are expressed in log scale and reported as mean ± SD.
Figure 3LC-MS profile of sphingosine, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and dihydrosphingosine-1-phosphate (dhS1P) in sub-pooled sera from NW, –vitDNW and –vitDO men (A) and women (B). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA test, with Tukey post-hoc test. Data are expressed in log scale and reported as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Cer and SM sex-related variations in sub-pooled sera of NW (A,B), -vitDNW (C), and -vitDO (D,E) men and women. Statistical analysis was performed by Student t-test. Data are expressed in log scale and reported as mean ± SD.