Literature DB >> 31722888

Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.

Pablo Yagupsky1, Pilar Morata2,3, Juan D Colmenero4,3.   

Abstract

The clinical presentation of brucellosis in humans is variable and unspecific, and thus, laboratory corroboration of the diagnosis is essential for the patient's proper treatment. The diagnosis of brucellar infections can be made by culture, serological tests, and nucleic acid amplification assays. Modern automated blood culture systems enable detection of acute cases of brucellosis within the routine 5- to 7-day incubation protocol employed in clinical microbiology laboratories, although a longer incubation and performance of blind subcultures may be needed for protracted cases. Serological tests, though they lack specificity and provide results that may be difficult to interpret in individuals repeatedly exposed to Brucella organisms, nevertheless remain a diagnostic cornerstone in resource-poor countries. Nucleic acid amplification assays combine exquisite sensitivity, specificity, and safety and enable rapid diagnosis of the disease. However, long-term persistence of positive molecular test results in patients that have apparently fully recovered is common and has unclear clinical significance and therapeutic implications. Therefore, as long as there are no sufficiently validated commercial tests or studies that demonstrate an adequate interlaboratory reproducibility of the different homemade PCR assays, cultures and serological methods will remain the primary tools for the diagnosis and posttherapeutic follow-up of human brucellosis.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture; diagnosis; human brucellosis; nucleic acid amplification methods; serological tests

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31722888      PMCID: PMC6860005          DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00073-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0893-8512            Impact factor:   26.132


  267 in total

1.  Posttreatment follow-Up of brucellosis by PCR assay.

Authors:  P Morata; M I Queipo-Ortuño; J M Reguera; M A García-Ordoñez; C Pichardo; J D Colmenero
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Direct urease test on BACTEC blood cultures: early presumptive diagnosis of brucellosis in an area of endemicity.

Authors:  M Rich; R M Bannatyne; Z A Memish
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Specific antibodies detected during relapse of human brucellosis.

Authors:  T Pellicer; J Ariza; A Foz; R Pallares; F Gudiol
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  Brucella as a biological weapon.

Authors:  G Pappas; P Panagopoulou; L Christou; N Akritidis
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Rose Bengal test: diagnostic yield and use for the rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis in emergency departments in endemic areas.

Authors:  J D Ruiz-Mesa; J Sánchez-Gonzalez; J M Reguera; L Martín; S Lopez-Palmero; J D Colmenero
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Real-time PCR for detection of Brucella spp. DNA in human serum samples.

Authors:  C Debeaumont; P A Falconnet; M Maurin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  DNA/RNA preparation for molecular detection.

Authors:  Stephanie A Thatcher
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Diagnosis of human brucellosis in Egypt by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A A El Kholy; H E Gomaa; M G El Anany; E Abd El Rasheed
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.628

9.  Usefulness of a quantitative real-time PCR assay using serum samples to discriminate between inactive, serologically positive and active human brucellosis.

Authors:  M I Queipo-Ortuño; J D Colmenero; M J Bravo; M A García-Ordoñez; P Morata
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  A novel real-time PCR assay for specific detection of Brucella melitensis.

Authors:  Rene Kaden; Sevinc Ferrari; Erik Alm; Tara Wahab
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  29 in total

1.  B Cells Inhibit CD4+ T Cell-Mediated Immunity to Brucella Infection in a Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Alexis S Dadelahi; Carolyn A Lacey; Catherine A Chambers; Bárbara Ponzilacqua-Silva; Jerod A Skyberg
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  A systematic analysis of and recommendations for public health events involving brucellosis from 2006 to 2019 in China.

Authors:  Zhiguo Liu; Miao Wang; Yaxin Tian; Zhongqiu Li; Liping Gao; Zhenjun Li
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

3.  Epidemiological characterization of notified human brucellosis cases in Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Fabricio Bernardi; Marina Gabriela Possa; Camila Elizandra Rossi; Luíz Guilherme Dercore Benevenuto; Iucif Abrão Nascif Junior; Jacqueline de Jesus; Barbara Cardoso de Oliveira; Carla Zanelatto; Joice Gama Sena; Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves; Fabiana Elias
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.169

4.  Epidemiological assessment of 5598 brucellosis inpatients in Spain (1997-2015).

Authors:  Beatriz Rodríguez-Alonso; Hugo Almeida; Montserrat Alonso-Sardón; Virginia Velasco-Tirado; Ángela Romero-Alegria; Javier Pardo-Lledias; Amparo López-Bernus; José Luis Pérez Arellano; Moncef Belhassen-García
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Hospital-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of brucellosis diagnostic tests and treatment in Kenyan hospitals.

Authors:  Lorren Alumasa; Lian F Thomas; Fredrick Amanya; Samuel M Njoroge; Ignacio Moriyón; Josiah Makhandia; Jonathan Rushton; Eric M Fèvre; Laura C Falzon
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  Congenital brucellosis: A case report.

Authors:  Yahya Ali Mohzari; Renad Abdullah Alshuraim; Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq; Saud O ALanazi; Najwa Alghamdi; Ahmed A Alrashed; Amal Khalil Hassounhe; Meshal A Alzaaqi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Performance characteristics and costs of serological tests for brucellosis in a pastoralist community of northern Tanzania.

Authors:  AbdulHamid S Lukambagire; Ângelo J Mendes; Rebecca F Bodenham; John A McGiven; Nestory A Mkenda; Coletha Mathew; Matthew P Rubach; Philoteus Sakasaka; Davis D Shayo; Venance P Maro; Gabriel M Shirima; Kate M Thomas; Christopher J Kasanga; Rudovick R Kazwala; Jo E B Halliday; Blandina T Mmbaga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Improved Early Detection of Focal Brucellosis Complications with Anti-Brucella IgG.

Authors:  Nannan Xu; Xiaomeng Dong; Yongyuan Yao; Yanyan Guan; Fengzhe Chen; Feng Zheng; Gang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 11.677

9.  Serological and Molecular Detection of Bovine Brucellosis at Institutional Livestock Farms in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Tariq Jamil; Falk Melzer; Muhammad Saqib; Asim Shahzad; Khushal Khan Kasi; Muhammad Hammad Hussain; Imaad Rashid; Usman Tahir; Iahtasham Khan; Muhammad Haleem Tayyab; Sami Ullah; Mashkoor Mohsin; Muhammad Khalid Mansoor; Stefan Schwarz; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Epidemiological, Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients with Brucella Infection in Anhui Province, China.

Authors:  Cuixiao Shi; Lianzi Wang; Dongmei Lv; Gang Wang; Hylemariam Mihiretie Mengist; Tengchuan Jin; Bo Wang; Ying Huang; Yajuan Li; Yuanhong Xu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.