Sumesh Kaistha1, Bhaskar Nandi2, Ameet Kumar3. 1. Classified Specialist (Surgery) & GI Surgeon, Command Hospital (Central Command), Lucknow, India. 2. Air Officer Commanding, AFCME, New Delhi, India. 3. Classified Specialist (Surgery) & GI Surgeon, Command Hospital (Air Force), Bengaluru, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has expanded exponentially in the last two decades but, somehow it is limited in pancreatic surgery by virtue of the pancreas being a friable, retroperitoneal organ with difficult access and adjacent major vessels risking torrential bleed. It is thought to be unforgiving if not handled well. However, improvements in technology and surgeon's expertise have pushed the boundaries of minimal access surgery (MAS) to include pancreas in its domain. We present our series of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) with an aim to look at the feasibility and outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all LPS done at the Gastrointestinal Surgery (GIS) centre of a tertiary care Armed Forces Hospital over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 24 LPS were done during this period. The median age of the patients was 46 years (range; 13-81). There were 14 male and 10 female patients. Nine patients had at least one co-morbidity. Three patients underwent laparoscopic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy, 4 distal pancreatectomy, 4 laparoscopic Whipples pancreaticoduodenectomy, 6 laparoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy, 6 laparoscopic cystogastrostomy and 1 roux en y cystojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: LPS can be performed for almost all open pancreatic surgeries and can be done with reasonable outcomes. However, it has a steep learning curve and therefore, a hybrid approach leading to a totally laparoscopic approach may be the way forward.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has expanded exponentially in the last two decades but, somehow it is limited in pancreatic surgery by virtue of the pancreas being a friable, retroperitoneal organ with difficult access and adjacent major vessels risking torrential bleed. It is thought to be unforgiving if not handled well. However, improvements in technology and surgeon's expertise have pushed the boundaries of minimal access surgery (MAS) to include pancreas in its domain. We present our series of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) with an aim to look at the feasibility and outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all LPS done at the Gastrointestinal Surgery (GIS) centre of a tertiary care Armed Forces Hospital over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 24 LPS were done during this period. The median age of the patients was 46 years (range; 13-81). There were 14 male and 10 female patients. Nine patients had at least one co-morbidity. Three patients underwent laparoscopic lateral pancreaticojejunostomy, 4 distal pancreatectomy, 4 laparoscopic Whipples pancreaticoduodenectomy, 6 laparoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy, 6 laparoscopic cystogastrostomy and 1 roux en y cystojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: LPS can be performed for almost all open pancreatic surgeries and can be done with reasonable outcomes. However, it has a steep learning curve and therefore, a hybrid approach leading to a totally laparoscopic approach may be the way forward.
Authors: Thijs de Rooij; Sjors Klompmaker; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Michael L Kendrick; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Bjørn Edwin; Mushegh A Sahakyan; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink; Marco Braga; Jean-Michel Fabre; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Igor E Khatkov Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marc G H Besselink; Thomas J Verwer; Ernst J P Schoenmaeckers; Erik Buskens; Ben U Ridwan; Maarten R Visser; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Hein G Gooszen Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2007-12
Authors: Marc G H Besselink; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Marja A Boermeester; Thomas L Bollen; Erik Buskens; Cornelis H C Dejong; Casper H J van Eijck; Harry van Goor; Sijbrand S Hofker; Johan S Lameris; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Rutger J Ploeg; Bert van Ramshorst; Alexander F M Schaapherder; Miguel A Cuesta; Esther C J Consten; Dirk J Gouma; Erwin van der Harst; Eric J Hesselink; Lex P J Houdijk; Tom M Karsten; Cees J H M van Laarhoven; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie; Camiel Rosman; Ernst Jan Spillenaar Bilgen; Robin Timmer; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Ralph J de Wit; Ben J M Witteman; Hein G Gooszen Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 2.102