| Literature DB >> 31717892 |
Mao Wu1, Yajun Fan1, Jiawei Li1, Danqing Lu1, Yaping Guo1, Lianwu Xie1, Yiqiang Wu2.
Abstract
The rapid detection of organophosphorus pesticide reEntities:
Keywords: fluorescence detection; magnetic molecularly imprinted polymeric microspheres; organophosphorus pesticides; pesticide residues; sensor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717892 PMCID: PMC6918286 DOI: 10.3390/polym11111770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Illustration of the preparation of magnetic, molecularly-imprinted polymeric microspheres-vinyl phosphate-modified carbon dots (MMIPs-CDs@VPA) detection system for triazophos.
Figure 2Ball and stick model of four candidate functional monomers and triazophos for structural optimization.
The minimum energy of four candidate functional monomers, and triazophos and the binding energies of the complexes.
| Compounds | Minimum Energy (Ha) | Binding Energy (Ha) | Binding Energy (kJ mol−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAA | −306.4925 | / | / |
| 4-VP | −325.6957 | / | / |
| VPA | −646.3007 | / | / |
| 1-Oc | −706.9781 | / | / |
| Triazophos | −1597.6121 | / | / |
| Triazophos - MAA | −1904.1237 | 0.0191 | 50.1471 |
| Triazophos - 4-VP | −1923.3311 | 0.0232 | 60.9116 |
| Triazophos - VPA | −2243.9627 | 0.0499 | 131.0125 |
| Triazophos - 1-Oc | −2304.7253 | 0.1351 | 354.7051 |
| Triazophos-MAA-4-VP | −2229.8741 | 0.0738 | 193.7619 |
| Triazophos-MAA-VPA | −2550.5043 | 0.0990 | 259.9245 |
| Triazophos-MAA-1-Oc | −2611.2362 | 0.1535 | 403.0143 |
| Triazophos-4-VP-VPA | −2569.7154 | 0.1069 | 280.6660 |
| Triazophos-4-VP-1-Oc | −2630.4462 | 0.1603 | 420.8677 |
| Triazophos–VPA–1-Oc | −2951.0872 | 0.1963 | 515.3857 |
Figure 3Binding energy (ΔE) between triazophos to VPA and 1-Oc under different molar ratios calculated by Gaussian molecular simulation.
Experimental verification of the adsorption capacity of imprinted polymer formed by triazophos and one out of four candidate functional monomers.
| Monomer |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MMIPs | MNIPs | ||
| MAA | 0.2209 | 0.0898 | 2.460 |
| 4-VP | 0.2315 | 0.0902 | 2.567 |
| VPA | 0.2435 | 0.0811 | 3.003 |
| 1-Oc | 0.2599 | 0.0831 | 3.128 |
Figure 4The effect of the mole ratio of template and dual-functional monomers′ pre-assembled complexes on adsorption capacities of MMIPs and MNIPs.
Figure 5TEM and particle size analysis of Fe3O4 (a), Fe3O4@mSiO2 (b), and MMIPs (c).
Figure 6FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4 (a), Fe3O4@CTAB/mSiO2 (b), Fe3O4@mSiO2 (c), vinyl-Fe3O4@mSiO2 (d), MMIPs (e), and MNIPs (f).
Figure 7TEM of CDs (a) and CDs@VPA (b); XPS spectra of CDs (c).
Figure 8FT-IR spectra of APTES, CDs, vinyl-CDs, CDs@VPA, VPA, and CDs@VPA (a); absorption and fluorescence spectra of CDs (excitation wavelength from 350 to 460 nm; 8 mg mL−1 CDs in all analyte solution) (b); fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of CDs@VPA (c); the fluorescence stability property of CDs@VPA from 0.5 to 15 days at 4 °C refrigerator in the dark (d).
Figure 9Fluorescence spectra of CDs@VPA in the presence of various concentrations of triazophos: 0, 0.0035, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 mmol L−1, respectively (a). Stern–Volmer plot of triazophos concentration and the fluorescence intensity of triazophos-CDs@VPA complex (the error bars represent the standard deviations of three parallel tests) (b).
HPLC and MMIPs-CDs@VPA FL analysis of triazophos in cucumber sample.
| Detection Method | Linear Range (mmol L−1) | LOD (mmol L−1) | Detection Time (min) | Concentration of Triazophos (mmol kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPLC | 0.0006–5.0 | 2.0 × 10−6 | 30 | 0.0049 ± 0.0011 * |
| MMIPs−CDs@VPA FL | 0.0035–0.2 | 0.0015 | 2 | 0.0044 ± 0.0018 |
* The measured concentration error of triazophos refers to the standard deviations of three parallel tests.