| Literature DB >> 30995724 |
Kuan-Wu Chu1, Sher Ling Lee2, Chi-Jung Chang3, Lingyun Liu4.
Abstract
Carbon dots (Entities:
Keywords: bottom up; carbon dots; electron transfer; photocatalysis; photocatalyst; photoluminescence; polymers; precursors; top down; visible light
Year: 2019 PMID: 30995724 PMCID: PMC6523528 DOI: 10.3390/polym11040689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Overall structure of the article.
Figure 2Common top-down and bottom-up approaches to synthesize carbon dots.
Small molecule dual precursors for carbon dot (CD) synthesis. QY: quantum yield.
| Carbon Source | Nitrogen Source | QY | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 80.6% | Ink, Fe3+ detection, CD/polymer composites | [ |
| Ethylamine | 8.4% | -- | ||
| n-heptylamine | 7.7% | -- | ||
| Urea | 19.4% | -- | ||
| Sodium citrate | Ethylenediamine | 21.6% | -- | [ |
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 53% | -- | [ |
| Hexamethylenetetramine | 17% | -- | ||
| Triethanolamine | 7% | -- | ||
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 69.3% | Bioimaging | [ |
| Diethylenetriamine | 68% | Bioimaging | ||
| Triethylenetetraamine | 33.4% | Bioimaging | ||
| Citric acid | Urea | 36% | Drug delivery | [ |
| Acrylic acid | Ethylenediamine | 30.5% | Fluorescent polymers | [ |
| p-phenylenediamine | Urea | up to 35% | Bioimaging | [ |
| Calcium citrate | Urea | 10.1% | Ink | [ |
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 1.7% | -- | [ |
Small molecule sole precursors for CD synthesis.
| Precursor (Method 1) | QY | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histidine (HT) | 10.7% | Melamine sensing | [ |
| Cysteine (TD) | -- | Solar cells, optoelectronics | [ |
| Serine (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
| Glucose (US) | 7% | -- | [ |
| Glucose (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
| o-phenylenediamine (ST) | 10.4%, green | Multi-color bioimaging | [ |
| m-phenylenediamine (ST) | 4.8%, blue | ||
| p-phenylenediamine (ST) | 20.6%, red | ||
| Citric acid (TD) | 11% | Fe3+ detection | [ |
| Citric acid (HT) | 7.2% | -- | [ |
| Ascorbic acid (HT) | -- | Photocatalysis | [ |
| Ethylenediamine (HT) | 3.8% | -- | [ |
| Acrylamide (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
| EDTA disodium salt (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
1 HT: hydrothermal treatment; TD: thermal decomposition; PT: plasma treatment; US: Ultrasonic treatment; ST: solvothermal treatment; EDTA: ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid.
Natural polymer-derived CDs, preparation methods, and applications.
| Starting Material | Synthesis Method | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lignin + H2O2 | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 40 min | Bioimaging | [ |
| Chitosan | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 12 h | Bioimaging | [ |
| Xylan + NH4OH | Hydrothermal, 200 °C, 12 h | Bioimaging | [ |
| Citrus pectin + NaOH | Hydrothermal, 100–180 °C, 2 h | Bioimaging | [ |
| Silk fibroin | Microwave (300 W), 20 min | Biomedical | [ |
| Gelatin | Hydrothermal, 200 °C, 3 h | Bioimaging, optical devices | [ |
| Peach gum polysaccharide | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 12 h | Optical devices | [ |
| Cashew gum | Microwave (800 W), 30–40 min | -- | [ |
| Peanut shell | Pyrolysis, 400 °C, 4 h | Metal ion detection (Cu2+) | [ |
| Sweet potato | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 18 h | Bioimaging, metal ion detection (Fe3+) | [ |
| Pomelo peel | Hydrothermal, 200 °C, 3 h | Metal ion detection (Hg2+) | [ |
| Grass | Hydrothermal, 150–200 °C, 3 h | Metal ion detection (Cu2+) | [ |
| Cow milk | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 12 h | Antimicrobial | [ |
| Egg white | Hydrothermal, 220 °C, 48 h | Metal ion detection, bioimaging, optical devices | [ |
| Egg white or egg yolk | Plasma treatment, 3 min | Printing ink | [ |
Synthetic polymer-derived CDs, preparation methods, and applications.
| Polymer | Structure | Synthesis Method | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branched polyethyleneimine |
| Hydrothermal | Bioimaging, gene delivery | [ |
| Polyethyleneimine |
| Hydrothermal | -- | [ |
| Polyethyleneimine | Same above | Microwave | Gene delivery | [ |
| Polyamindoamine dendrimer |
| Hydrothermal | Fe3+ detection, ink | [ |
| Polyacrylic acid (+EDA) |
| Hydrothermal | Graphic security, information encryption | [ |
| Polyvinyl alcohol |
| Hydrothermal | Bioimaging | [ |
| Photocatalysis | [ | |||
| Polyacrylamide |
| Hydrothermal | Bioimaging | [ |
| Polyacrylamide | Same above | Plasma treatment | -- | [ |
| Polyethylene glycol |
| Ultrasonic | Photocatalysis | [ |
| Polypropylene |
| Thermal decomposition | -- | [ |
| P(methyl acrylate-r-EDY) |
| Thermal decomposition | -- | [ |
| PMPC |
| Microwave | Biomedical | [ |
| PCB-1 |
| Microwave | Biomedical | [ |
Figure 3The proposed reaction mechanism of carbon dots-cadmium sulfide (CDs-CdS) under visible light irradiation. Figure adapted from reference [30].
Photocatalytic degradation activity of CDs/ZnO.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1: Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs/ZnO foam | nanocomposite | Dispersion in CDs solution | 250-W Xe (vis) | MB > RhB > MO | [ |
| CDs/ZnO | Porous nanorods | Solvent thermal + deposition | 300-W Xe (vis) | Phenol: 94.3%/60 min | [ |
| CDs/ZnO | Heterostructure | Sol-gel + spin coating | 18-W UV lamp (vis) | RhB: 30%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/ZnO | Nanocomposite (20–30 nm) | Hydrothermal | 3 of 8-W visible light lamp | Benzene gas: | [ |
1 MB: methylene blue; RhB: Rhodamine B; MO: methyl orange.
Figure 4The schematic photocatalytic mechanism of Gembrozil (GEM) degradation by the CDs/TiO2 composite under simulated sunlight irradiation. C-Dots: carbon dots. SHE: standard hydrogen electrode. Figure adapted from reference [95].
Photocatalytic degradation activity of CDs/TiO2.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1 | Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs/TiO2 | Macro-mesoporous nanospheres | Dispersion | 300-W halogen lamp (vis) | MB | - | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Composite | Hydrothermal-calcination | 350-W arc Xe lamp (vis) | GEM | 89%/8 min | [ |
| N-CDs/TiO2 | Composite | Hydrothermal | 6-W fluorescent lamp (vis) | NO | 27%/120 h (vis) | [ |
| N-CDs/TiO2 | Hierarchical microspheres/nanorods | Hydrothermal | 500-W Xe (vis) | RhB | > 95%/30 min | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanofibers | Hydrothermal | Natural sunny day (11 a.m. and 3 p.m.) | MB | 71%/95 min | [ |
| CDs/Hydrogenated TiO2 | Nanobelt heterostructure | Hydrothermal + bath reflux | 350-W Hg lamp (UV) | MO | > 86%/25 min (UV) 50%/25 min (vis) | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanohybrid | Hydrothermal | 500-W halogen lamp | MO | 96.7%/8 h | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanoparticles/microsphere hybrid | Sol-gel method | 500-W Xe lamp (vis) | MB | 90%/2 h | [ |
| CDs/rutile TiO2 | Nanocomposite | Mix + vacuum drying | 350-W Xe lamp (vis) | MB | 97%/1 h | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanocomposite | Sol-gel method | 300-W halogen lamp (vis, λ not specified) | MB | ca. 100%/25 min | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanodots/microcolumn composite | One-pot hydrothermal | 14 W UV lamp | RhB | ca. 100%/75 min (UV) 77%/150 min (vis) | [ |
1 MB: methylene blue; GEM: Gembrozil; NO: nitrogen oxide; RhB: Rhodamine B; MO: methyl orange.
Figure 5Graphical illustration of possible photocatalytic reaction mechanism of the nitrogen-doped CDs/Bi2WO6 composite. Figure adapted from reference [101].
Figure 6The schematic photocatalytic mechanism of indometacin (IDM) degradation by the CDs-doped BiPO4 composite under irradiation of simulated sunlight. Figure adapted from reference [105].
Photodegradation efficiency of CDs/Bi composites.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1: Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs/Bi2WO6 | 0D/2D ultrathin nanosheets | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | MO: 94.1%/120 min | [ |
| N-CDs/Bi2WO6 | Hybrid material | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | TC: 97%/25 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2WO6 | Nanocomposite | Hydrothermal | 500-W Xe | RhB: 97%/10 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2WO6 | Hybrid material | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | RhB: ~98%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2MoO6 | Irregular nanosheets | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | CIP: 88%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/BiPO4 | Nanorods | Hydrothermal- | 350-W Xe | IDM: ~ 90%/120 min | [ |
| N-CDs/BiPO4 | Nanoparticles | Ionic liquid assisted solvothermal | 250-W high | CIP: 87.5%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/BiOBr | Microspheres | Solvothermal and hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | RhB: ~100%/145 min | [ |
| CDs/BiOX (X=Br, Cl) | Hybrid nanosheets | Ionic liquid induced | 300-W Xe (vis) | BiOBr: | [ |
| CDs/BiOI | Uniform layered structure nanoplates | Hydrothermal | 150-W Xe (vis) | MO: 98%/50 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2O2CO3 | Nanoparticles | Dynamic- | 400-W metal halide (vis) | MB: 94.45%/120 min Phenol: 61.46%/120 min | [ |
1 MO: methyl orange; BPA: bisphenol A; TC: tetracycline; RhB: rhodamine B; CIP: ciprofloxacin; TC-HCl: tetracycline hydrochloride; IDM: Indometacin; PNP: p-Nitrotoluene; MB: methylene blue.
Figure 7A schematic mechanism of Z-schemed NCDs/Ag3PO4/BiVO4 photocatalyst to degrade organics. Figure adapted from reference [117].
Photodegradation activity of miscellaneous other kinds of CD composites.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1 | Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCDs/g-C3N4 | Composite | Polymerization | 350-W Xe (vis) | IDM | 91.5%/90 min | [ |
| CDs/g-C3N4 | Nanocomposite | Electrostatic adsorption | (vis) | MB | > 90%/90 min | [ |
| CDs/g-C3N4 | Heterojunction | Low temperature method | 250-W Xe (vis) | RhB and TC-HCl | RhB: 95.2%/210 min | [ |
| CDs/g-C3N4 | Heterojunction | Impregnation- thermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | Phenol | 100%/within 200 min | [ |
| CDs/carbon nitride | Hybrid composite | High temperature treatment | Infrared light | MO | 90%/4 h | [ |
| CDs/FeOOH | Nanocomposite | Hyrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | NO | 22%/30 min | [ |
| N-CDs/Ag3PO4/BiVO4 | Z-scheme hybrid material | Solvothermal- | 300-W Xe (vis) | TC-HCl | 88.9%/30 min | [ |
| CDs/MoO3 | Z-scheme microstructure | Calcination | 350-W Xe (vis) | TC | 88.4%/90 min | [ |
| CDs/CdSe/rGO | Hybrid nanomaterial | Hydrothermal | 350-W Xe (vis) | TC-HCl | 90%/60 min | [ |
1 IDM: Indometacin; MB: methylene blue; RhB: rhodamine B; MO: methyl orange; NO: nitrogen oxide; TC-HCl: tetracycline hydrochloride; TC: tetracycline.