| Literature DB >> 30995724 |
Kuan-Wu Chu1, Sher Ling Lee2, Chi-Jung Chang3, Lingyun Liu4.
Abstract
Carbon dots (CDs), a class of carbon-based sub-ten-nanometer nanoparticles, have attracted great attention since their discovery fifteen years ago. Because of the outstanding photoluminescence properties, photostability, low toxicity, and low cost, CDs have potential to replace traditional semiconductor quantum dots which have serious drawbacks of toxicity and high cost. This review covers the common top-down and bottom-up methods for the synthesis of CDs, different categories of CD precursors (small molecules, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers), one-pot and multi-step methods to produce CDs/photocatalyst composites, and recent advances of CDs on photocatalysis applications mostly in pollutant degradation and energy areas. A broad range of precursors forming fluorescent CDs are discussed, including small molecule sole or dual precursors, natural polymers such as pure polysaccharides and proteins and crude bio-resources from plants or animals, and various synthetic polymer precursors with positive, negative, neutral and hydrophilic, hydrophobic, or zwitterionic feature. Because of the wide light absorbance, excellent photoluminescence properties and electron transfer ability, CDs have emerged as a new type of photocatalyst. Recent work of CDs as sole photocatalyst or in combination with other materials (e.g., metal, metal sulfide, metal oxide, bismuth-based semiconductor, or other traditional photocatalysts) to form composite catalyst for various photocatalytic applications are reviewed. Possible future directions are proposed at the end of the article on mechanistic studies, production of CDs with better controlled properties, expansion of polymer precursor pool, and systematic studies of CDs for photocatalysis applications.Entities:
Keywords: bottom up; carbon dots; electron transfer; photocatalysis; photocatalyst; photoluminescence; polymers; precursors; top down; visible light
Year: 2019 PMID: 30995724 PMCID: PMC6523528 DOI: 10.3390/polym11040689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Overall structure of the article.
Figure 2Common top-down and bottom-up approaches to synthesize carbon dots.
Small molecule dual precursors for carbon dot (CD) synthesis. QY: quantum yield.
| Carbon Source | Nitrogen Source | QY | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 80.6% | Ink, Fe3+ detection, CD/polymer composites | [ |
| Ethylamine | 8.4% | -- | ||
| n-heptylamine | 7.7% | -- | ||
| Urea | 19.4% | -- | ||
| Sodium citrate | Ethylenediamine | 21.6% | -- | [ |
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 53% | -- | [ |
| Hexamethylenetetramine | 17% | -- | ||
| Triethanolamine | 7% | -- | ||
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 69.3% | Bioimaging | [ |
| Diethylenetriamine | 68% | Bioimaging | ||
| Triethylenetetraamine | 33.4% | Bioimaging | ||
| Citric acid | Urea | 36% | Drug delivery | [ |
| Acrylic acid | Ethylenediamine | 30.5% | Fluorescent polymers | [ |
| p-phenylenediamine | Urea | up to 35% | Bioimaging | [ |
| Calcium citrate | Urea | 10.1% | Ink | [ |
| Citric acid | Ethylenediamine | 1.7% | -- | [ |
Small molecule sole precursors for CD synthesis.
| Precursor (Method 1) | QY | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histidine (HT) | 10.7% | Melamine sensing | [ |
| Cysteine (TD) | -- | Solar cells, optoelectronics | [ |
| Serine (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
| Glucose (US) | 7% | -- | [ |
| Glucose (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
| o-phenylenediamine (ST) | 10.4%, green | Multi-color bioimaging | [ |
| m-phenylenediamine (ST) | 4.8%, blue | ||
| p-phenylenediamine (ST) | 20.6%, red | ||
| Citric acid (TD) | 11% | Fe3+ detection | [ |
| Citric acid (HT) | 7.2% | -- | [ |
| Ascorbic acid (HT) | -- | Photocatalysis | [ |
| Ethylenediamine (HT) | 3.8% | -- | [ |
| Acrylamide (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
| EDTA disodium salt (PT) | Blue fluorescence | -- | [ |
1 HT: hydrothermal treatment; TD: thermal decomposition; PT: plasma treatment; US: Ultrasonic treatment; ST: solvothermal treatment; EDTA: ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid.
Natural polymer-derived CDs, preparation methods, and applications.
| Starting Material | Synthesis Method | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lignin + H2O2 | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 40 min | Bioimaging | [ |
| Chitosan | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 12 h | Bioimaging | [ |
| Xylan + NH4OH | Hydrothermal, 200 °C, 12 h | Bioimaging | [ |
| Citrus pectin + NaOH | Hydrothermal, 100–180 °C, 2 h | Bioimaging | [ |
| Silk fibroin | Microwave (300 W), 20 min | Biomedical | [ |
| Gelatin | Hydrothermal, 200 °C, 3 h | Bioimaging, optical devices | [ |
| Peach gum polysaccharide | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 12 h | Optical devices | [ |
| Cashew gum | Microwave (800 W), 30–40 min | -- | [ |
| Peanut shell | Pyrolysis, 400 °C, 4 h | Metal ion detection (Cu2+) | [ |
| Sweet potato | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 18 h | Bioimaging, metal ion detection (Fe3+) | [ |
| Pomelo peel | Hydrothermal, 200 °C, 3 h | Metal ion detection (Hg2+) | [ |
| Grass | Hydrothermal, 150–200 °C, 3 h | Metal ion detection (Cu2+) | [ |
| Cow milk | Hydrothermal, 180 °C, 12 h | Antimicrobial | [ |
| Egg white | Hydrothermal, 220 °C, 48 h | Metal ion detection, bioimaging, optical devices | [ |
| Egg white or egg yolk | Plasma treatment, 3 min | Printing ink | [ |
Synthetic polymer-derived CDs, preparation methods, and applications.
| Polymer | Structure | Synthesis Method | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branched polyethyleneimine |
| Hydrothermal | Bioimaging, gene delivery | [ |
| Polyethyleneimine |
| Hydrothermal | -- | [ |
| Polyethyleneimine | Same above | Microwave | Gene delivery | [ |
| Polyamindoamine dendrimer |
| Hydrothermal | Fe3+ detection, ink | [ |
| Polyacrylic acid (+EDA) |
| Hydrothermal | Graphic security, information encryption | [ |
| Polyvinyl alcohol |
| Hydrothermal | Bioimaging | [ |
| Photocatalysis | [ | |||
| Polyacrylamide |
| Hydrothermal | Bioimaging | [ |
| Polyacrylamide | Same above | Plasma treatment | -- | [ |
| Polyethylene glycol |
| Ultrasonic | Photocatalysis | [ |
| Polypropylene |
| Thermal decomposition | -- | [ |
| P(methyl acrylate-r-EDY) |
| Thermal decomposition | -- | [ |
| PMPC |
| Microwave | Biomedical | [ |
| PCB-1 |
| Microwave | Biomedical | [ |
Figure 3The proposed reaction mechanism of carbon dots-cadmium sulfide (CDs-CdS) under visible light irradiation. Figure adapted from reference [30].
Photocatalytic degradation activity of CDs/ZnO.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1: Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs/ZnO foam | nanocomposite | Dispersion in CDs solution | 250-W Xe (vis) | MB > RhB > MO | [ |
| CDs/ZnO | Porous nanorods | Solvent thermal + deposition | 300-W Xe (vis) | Phenol: 94.3%/60 min | [ |
| CDs/ZnO | Heterostructure | Sol-gel + spin coating | 18-W UV lamp (vis) | RhB: 30%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/ZnO | Nanocomposite (20–30 nm) | Hydrothermal | 3 of 8-W visible light lamp | Benzene gas: | [ |
1 MB: methylene blue; RhB: Rhodamine B; MO: methyl orange.
Figure 4The schematic photocatalytic mechanism of Gembrozil (GEM) degradation by the CDs/TiO2 composite under simulated sunlight irradiation. C-Dots: carbon dots. SHE: standard hydrogen electrode. Figure adapted from reference [95].
Photocatalytic degradation activity of CDs/TiO2.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1 | Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs/TiO2 | Macro-mesoporous nanospheres | Dispersion | 300-W halogen lamp (vis) | MB | - | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Composite | Hydrothermal-calcination | 350-W arc Xe lamp (vis) | GEM | 89%/8 min | [ |
| N-CDs/TiO2 | Composite | Hydrothermal | 6-W fluorescent lamp (vis) | NO | 27%/120 h (vis) | [ |
| N-CDs/TiO2 | Hierarchical microspheres/nanorods | Hydrothermal | 500-W Xe (vis) | RhB | > 95%/30 min | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanofibers | Hydrothermal | Natural sunny day (11 a.m. and 3 p.m.) | MB | 71%/95 min | [ |
| CDs/Hydrogenated TiO2 | Nanobelt heterostructure | Hydrothermal + bath reflux | 350-W Hg lamp (UV) | MO | > 86%/25 min (UV) 50%/25 min (vis) | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanohybrid | Hydrothermal | 500-W halogen lamp | MO | 96.7%/8 h | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanoparticles/microsphere hybrid | Sol-gel method | 500-W Xe lamp (vis) | MB | 90%/2 h | [ |
| CDs/rutile TiO2 | Nanocomposite | Mix + vacuum drying | 350-W Xe lamp (vis) | MB | 97%/1 h | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanocomposite | Sol-gel method | 300-W halogen lamp (vis, λ not specified) | MB | ca. 100%/25 min | [ |
| CDs/TiO2 | Nanodots/microcolumn composite | One-pot hydrothermal | 14 W UV lamp | RhB | ca. 100%/75 min (UV) 77%/150 min (vis) | [ |
1 MB: methylene blue; GEM: Gembrozil; NO: nitrogen oxide; RhB: Rhodamine B; MO: methyl orange.
Figure 5Graphical illustration of possible photocatalytic reaction mechanism of the nitrogen-doped CDs/Bi2WO6 composite. Figure adapted from reference [101].
Figure 6The schematic photocatalytic mechanism of indometacin (IDM) degradation by the CDs-doped BiPO4 composite under irradiation of simulated sunlight. Figure adapted from reference [105].
Photodegradation efficiency of CDs/Bi composites.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1: Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs/Bi2WO6 | 0D/2D ultrathin nanosheets | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | MO: 94.1%/120 min | [ |
| N-CDs/Bi2WO6 | Hybrid material | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | TC: 97%/25 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2WO6 | Nanocomposite | Hydrothermal | 500-W Xe | RhB: 97%/10 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2WO6 | Hybrid material | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | RhB: ~98%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2MoO6 | Irregular nanosheets | Hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | CIP: 88%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/BiPO4 | Nanorods | Hydrothermal- | 350-W Xe | IDM: ~ 90%/120 min | [ |
| N-CDs/BiPO4 | Nanoparticles | Ionic liquid assisted solvothermal | 250-W high | CIP: 87.5%/120 min | [ |
| CDs/BiOBr | Microspheres | Solvothermal and hydrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | RhB: ~100%/145 min | [ |
| CDs/BiOX (X=Br, Cl) | Hybrid nanosheets | Ionic liquid induced | 300-W Xe (vis) | BiOBr: | [ |
| CDs/BiOI | Uniform layered structure nanoplates | Hydrothermal | 150-W Xe (vis) | MO: 98%/50 min | [ |
| CDs/Bi2O2CO3 | Nanoparticles | Dynamic- | 400-W metal halide (vis) | MB: 94.45%/120 min Phenol: 61.46%/120 min | [ |
1 MO: methyl orange; BPA: bisphenol A; TC: tetracycline; RhB: rhodamine B; CIP: ciprofloxacin; TC-HCl: tetracycline hydrochloride; IDM: Indometacin; PNP: p-Nitrotoluene; MB: methylene blue.
Figure 7A schematic mechanism of Z-schemed NCDs/Ag3PO4/BiVO4 photocatalyst to degrade organics. Figure adapted from reference [117].
Photodegradation activity of miscellaneous other kinds of CD composites.
| Photocatalyst | Structure | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Model Pollutant 1 | Degradation Efficiency/Time | Ref (Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCDs/g-C3N4 | Composite | Polymerization | 350-W Xe (vis) | IDM | 91.5%/90 min | [ |
| CDs/g-C3N4 | Nanocomposite | Electrostatic adsorption | (vis) | MB | > 90%/90 min | [ |
| CDs/g-C3N4 | Heterojunction | Low temperature method | 250-W Xe (vis) | RhB and TC-HCl | RhB: 95.2%/210 min | [ |
| CDs/g-C3N4 | Heterojunction | Impregnation- thermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | Phenol | 100%/within 200 min | [ |
| CDs/carbon nitride | Hybrid composite | High temperature treatment | Infrared light | MO | 90%/4 h | [ |
| CDs/FeOOH | Nanocomposite | Hyrothermal | 300-W Xe (vis) | NO | 22%/30 min | [ |
| N-CDs/Ag3PO4/BiVO4 | Z-scheme hybrid material | Solvothermal- | 300-W Xe (vis) | TC-HCl | 88.9%/30 min | [ |
| CDs/MoO3 | Z-scheme microstructure | Calcination | 350-W Xe (vis) | TC | 88.4%/90 min | [ |
| CDs/CdSe/rGO | Hybrid nanomaterial | Hydrothermal | 350-W Xe (vis) | TC-HCl | 90%/60 min | [ |
1 IDM: Indometacin; MB: methylene blue; RhB: rhodamine B; MO: methyl orange; NO: nitrogen oxide; TC-HCl: tetracycline hydrochloride; TC: tetracycline.