| Literature DB >> 31717270 |
Arnold Amusengeri1, Lindy Astl2, Kevin Lobb1,3, Gennady M Verkhivker2,4,5, Özlem Tastan Bishop1.
Abstract
Combating malaria is almost a never-ending battle, asEntities:
Keywords: South African natural compounds; allosteric drugs; betweenness centrality; dynamic residue networks; heat shock proteins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717270 PMCID: PMC6887781 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on Hsp70 sequences showing the relationship between host (Hsc70) and parasitic proteins (PfHsp70-x and PfHsp70-1). Color code: Red: PfHsp70-x, PfHsp70-1, and Hsc70; purple: 7 non-falciparum (plasmodial); grey: 19 Protozoan (non-plasmodial); blue: 19 Eukaryotic (non-protozoan); yellow: 2KHO and 4B9Q. Percentage recurrence of 1000 bootstrap tests is indicated next to the branches.
Tabulated summary of best ranked docking solutions. All compounds were docked to the β-SBD back pocket in both PfHsp70-x and PfHsp70-1.
| Compound | Name | Chemical Formula | PfHsp70-x | PfHsp70-1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster Size | Average Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | Cluster Size | Average Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | |||
| SANC190 | Millecrone A | C15H24O | 75 | −7.13 | 65 | −7.03 |
| SANC451 | Varacin | C10H13NO2S5 | 45 | −8.68 | 39 | −8.73 |
| SANC636 | Montabuphine | C17H19NO4 | 83 | −8.82 | 58 | −8.26 |
| SANC649 | Isopolygodial | C15H2202 | 73 | −7.23 | 31 | −7.16 |
| SANC651 | Warburganal | C15H2203 | 68 | −7.47 | 26 | −7.70 |
Figure 2Chemical structures of identified natural compounds docked to the β-SBD back pocket in both PfHsp70-x and PfHsp70-1.
Figure 3(A–L) Violin plots showing the kernel probability density distribution of protein backbone RMSDs per MD run. Density traces were plotted symmetrically to the left and right of boxplots. The width is proportional to frequency of occurrence. The overlaid boxplots highlight data range and the distribution spread. The vertical inside line represents the median value. The bars range from 25th (bottom) to 75th (top) percentile. µ denotes the calculated RMSD mean value.
Figure 4Histograms of protein backbone RMSDs against the frequency of occurrence. The distribution in conformation populations between ligand-free and ligand-bound trajectories over 100 ns were compared. Dotted lines represent positions of calculated means. Color key: Yellow: ligand-free; red: SANC190-bound; blue: SANC651-bound. Histograms of duplicate trajectories can be found in supplementary data (Figure S4).
Figure 5Kernel density estimation plots of the radius gyration (Rg). Comparisons of structural compactness between ligand-free and ligand-bound PfHsp70-x and PfHsp70-1. (A–L) The RMSD violin plotting scheme was employed in plotting the Rg figure as well.
Figure 6Gibbs free energy landscapes illustrating conformation equilibrium observables as a function of PC1 and PC2. Colors range from yellow (Gibbs free energy minima) to purple (Gibbs free energy maxima). Each contour ring represents a change in the Gibbs free energy by 1 kJ/mol. Conformations visited (conformers) during simulations were labeled from C1–C30.
Figure 7Representative ligand-free and ligand-bound sub states (colored grey) of PfHsp70-x and PfHsp70-1. Structures were obtained from conformation clusters occupying low energy basins as depicted in Figure 6. The middle panel displays porcupine plots illustrating the direction and magnitude (indicated by the length of the porcupine) of dominant protein motions observed during simulation. Color code: Green: PfHsp70-x, Blue: PfHsp70-1. Circular arrows indicate ~90° rotation of structures.
Figure 8Per residue average L and average BC difference calculated between ligand-free and SANC190-bound systems (run1 and run2 on average). Top panel: Residues governing protein-ligand affinity; middle panel: Per residue average L difference; bottom panel: Per residue average BC difference.
Figure 9Computed average L and average BC per residue difference between ligand-free and SANC651-bound models (run1 and run2 on average). Top panel: Residues governing protein-ligand affinity; middle panel: Per residue average L difference; bottom panel: Per residue average BC difference.