Literature DB >> 15544817

Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues.

Gil Amitai1, Arye Shemesh, Einat Sitbon, Maxim Shklar, Dvir Netanely, Ilya Venger, Shmuel Pietrokovski.   

Abstract

Identifying active site residues strictly from protein three-dimensional structure is a difficult task, especially for proteins that have few or no homologues. We transformed protein structures into residue interaction graphs (RIGs), where amino acid residues are graph nodes and their interactions with each other are the graph edges. We found that active site, ligand-binding and evolutionary conserved residues, typically have high closeness values. Residues with high closeness values interact directly or by a few intermediates with all other residues of the protein. Combining closeness and surface accessibility identified active site residues in 70% of 178 representative structures. Detailed structural analysis of specific enzymes also located other types of functional residues. These include the substrate binding sites of acetylcholinesterases and subtilisin, and the regions whose structural changes activate MAP kinase and glycogen phosphorylase. Our approach uses single protein structures, and does not rely on sequence conservation, comparison to other similar structures or any prior knowledge. Residue closeness is distinct from various sequence and structure measures and can thus complement them in identifying key protein residues. Closeness integrates the effect of the entire protein on single residues. Such natural structural design may be evolutionary maintained to preserve interaction redundancy and contribute to optimal setting of functional sites.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15544817     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  158 in total

1.  Automatic prediction of flexible regions improves the accuracy of protein-protein docking models.

Authors:  Xiaohu Luo; Qiang Lü; Hongjie Wu; Lingyun Yang; Xu Huang; Peide Qian; Gang Fu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Analysis of core-periphery organization in protein contact networks reveals groups of structurally and functionally critical residues.

Authors:  Arnold Emerson Isaac; Sitabhra Sinha
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability.

Authors:  K V Brinda; Saraswathi Vishveshwara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: analysis of enzyme and non-enzyme families.

Authors:  Antonio del Sol; Hirotomo Fujihashi; Dolors Amoros; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and charged amino acid networks within protein.

Authors:  Md Aftabuddin; S Kundu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Screened nonbonded interactions in native proteins manipulate optimal paths for robust residue communication.

Authors:  Ali Rana Atilgan; Deniz Turgut; Canan Atilgan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Structure-based identification of catalytic residues.

Authors:  Ran Yahalom; Dan Reshef; Ayana Wiener; Sagiv Frankel; Nir Kalisman; Boaz Lerner; Chen Keasar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-04-12

8.  Enhanced performance in prediction of protein active sites with THEMATICS and support vector machines.

Authors:  Wenxu Tong; Ronald J Williams; Ying Wei; Leonel F Murga; Jaeju Ko; Mary Jo Ondrechen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Contact rearrangements form coupled networks from local motions in allosteric proteins.

Authors:  Michael D Daily; Tarak J Upadhyaya; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-04

10.  Dancing through Life: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Network-Centric Modeling of Allosteric Mechanisms in Hsp70 and Hsp110 Chaperone Proteins.

Authors:  Gabrielle Stetz; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.